LabattBlue Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 http://audio.wgr550....m?pageid=401026 1. Ted is pissed 2. I love Ted
zow2 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 http://audio.wgr550....m?pageid=401026[ 1. Ted is pissed 2. I love Ted What else did he say? Not able to listen.
apuszczalowski Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Basically nothing new, except he semed to change his stance that injuries are the issue, and things will be fine over time, also that no ones job is secure/safe Otherwise the same old "We need to fix this and get better"
Wharf Rat Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 There has been criticism fron time to time on this site and the Bills site of Howard Simon. Let me just say that Howard asked every tough question of this guy you could possibly ask. Excellent preparation.
Samson's Flow Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 While I don't expect Ted Black to come out and say they are going to burn this mother down, his responses tend to indicate the winds of change may start a blowin'
deluca67 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 http://audio.wgr550....m?pageid=401026 1. Ted is pissed 2. I love Ted Until changes are actually made he is no different than Larry Quinn, IMO.
radiomike Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Definitely a different tone than in prior interviews, albeit slight. I think the whole 'injury bug' excuse was their last gasp at an excuse for an under performing team. It sounds like he is now willing to acknowledge that this teams problems lie much deeper than just injuries, and that something must give sooner rather than later...
That Aud Smell Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 http://audio.wgr550....m?pageid=401026 1. Ted is pissed 2. I love Ted he notes that the team boasts 10-15 guys who are on pace for career-worst years (and tosses in a nod to the injuries), and that we're seeing the inevitable results. that's a fair point. on being asked about the franchise's commitment to the core group: he says he doesn't use that term or view the team's personnel that way; says that teams "flip over" every 3 or 4 years; that they don't have any particular commitments to players, they are committed to winning. as i started to listen, i thought it was same-old-same-old. but as the interview went on, i could hear the edge and sense how his tone seems different. gone are the days of his cracking "brian [burke] who?" on whether the team has given up on lindy, he said he wouldn't offer an opinion, but that when you see a team performing the way this team is performing that that is a fair question to ask. ouch (and hooray!). finally, kudos to howard simon. seriously.
spndnchz Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Is DR or LR job in jeopardy? "I'll stand by my prior responses on that" I want to apologize to the fans, this is not the team we envisioned. Is a player move coming? "Actions speak louder than words" "The commitment is iron clad" This year or improve for next year? Either of those or a hybrid, peel off pieces for future gains. Core? "That has yet to be determined, I've never thought of a core group. I don't think we're commited to any group of players, we're committed to win". Ken is on the trip, as planned, he's got a son in Winnipeg. Are the players not playing for Lindy? That's not creeping into my consciousness. I'm not one to undermine a player or anyone on the air. At some point will your hand be forced? (long winded) yes. He says there are three choices: Make a trade Sell off pieces for picks Peel of pieces for assets "These are questions for our hockey dept and GM and it's his job to manage" "Will depend on conversations that DR has in the days and weeks ahead. It's not XBox, it takes another team too." Will DR and LR always be here? I can't say that. I won't say that everyone will have their job, including myself.
... Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Until changes are actually made he is no different than Larry Quinn, IMO. I don't know. Have you listened to the interview? It's an exercise in nuance, and you need to have listened to prior interviews to really get anything out of it, but Black's tone WAS different this time. And Simon did do a good job of questioning him. Black apologized to the fans and it was sincere. He was reluctant to throw out the usual pat answers and talking points; his hesitation here indicates that he's not happy to "play along" and that the fans are cognizant when he, or anyone from the team, is "playing along". It was interesting.
Sabres Fan in NS Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 What else did he say? Not able to listen. Just listened ... thanks for the link Blue. In summary ... He is pissed and said the situation sucks. He did toe the party line concerning DR and LR, but when pushed (Simon tied to push him on several points throughout the interview, but Ted is a smart guy and didn't fall for it) Ted did say that no ones job is 100% safe forever (even his). He did not really blame injuries, but did say it is hard to evaluate players, or to talk trades, when so many players are out of the lineup. He did say something to the affect that the players are more to blame for the losing then DR, or LR. Something about not being sure that the core is what we need. About Miller asking for a trade ... side stepped that one and said that Miller was the expert on what he has asked for or not. It is up to the GM to manage the club. He did apologize to the fans for the results. That about sums it up ... take it for what it is ... more of the same, but with a few twists and his tone did seem very different.
Samson's Flow Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 I don't know. Have you listened to the interview? It's an exercise in nuance, and you need to have listened to prior interviews to really get anything out of it, but Black's tone WAS different this time. And Simon did do a good job of questioning him. Black apologized to the fans and it was sincere. He was reluctant to throw out the usual pat answers and talking points; his hesitation here indicates that he's not happy to "play along" and that the fans are cognizant when he, or anyone from the team, is "playing along". It was interesting. This is what I heard. A guy of Black's stature is never going to outright say they are pissed/this guy is as good as gone... it would kill their credibility. The way he phrased things and didn't just repeat the same company mantras meant they are not pleased IMO
deluca67 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 I don't know. Have you listened to the interview? It's an exercise in nuance, and you need to have listened to prior interviews to really get anything out of it, but Black's tone WAS different this time. And Simon did do a good job of questioning him. Black apologized to the fans and it was sincere. He was reluctant to throw out the usual pat answers and talking points; his hesitation here indicates that he's not happy to "play along" and that the fans are cognizant when he, or anyone from the team, is "playing along". It was interesting. I listened when it happened. I listened again. It's all just words at this point.
... Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 I listened when it happened. I listened again. It's all just words at this point. Your dinner; it's either hot or cold.
zow2 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Good. As i suspected the tone behind the scenes is much different than the public display. He's starting to let it slip. Better that Pegula faces this adversity now than later.
LabattBlue Posted January 19, 2012 Author Report Posted January 19, 2012 Until changes are actually made he is no different than Larry Quinn, IMO. Damn that's harsh.
zow2 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 The Sabres product is getting devalued and trashed by national media. Im sure Black and Pegs are beyond pissed.
Patty16 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Until changes are actually made he is no different than Larry Quinn, IMO. In addition to the changes already made? Your perpetual state of negitivity is always enlightening.
Weave Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Your dinner; it's either hot or cold. I think it is closer to..... His dinner, you can either talk about it or put it in front of me. And only one of those is actual evidence of the exsistance of dinner. Right now, I don't want to hear Ted Black too much either. I want to read an analysis on Spectorshockey of the trade we just made.
Ross Rhea Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Definitely a different tone than in prior interviews, albeit slight. I think the whole 'injury bug' excuse was their last gasp at an excuse for an under performing team. It sounds like he is now willing to acknowledge that this teams problems lie much deeper than just injuries, and that something must give sooner rather than later... that's a good thing. changes definatly need to be made.
deluca67 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 In addition to the changes already made? Your perpetual state of negitivity is always enlightening. What have those "changes" amounted to?
Sabres Fan in NS Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Until changes are actually made he is no different than Larry Quinn, IMO. That's the TSC spirit. While I will tend to agree with you even you must admit the tone was somewhat different in this interview. And injuries were not blamed for all the troubles. I think the ground work is starting.
... Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 I think it is closer to..... His dinner, you can either talk about it or put it in front of me. And only one of those is actual evidence of the exsistance of dinner. Right now, I don't want to hear Ted Black too much either. I want to read an analysis on Spectorshockey of the trade we just made. I think any sane Sabres fan wants what you and deluca want: action. The problem is that they have waited too long and have absolutely no leverage with any change they would want to make. Want a new coach? It will cost them a lot right now to hire someone on. A new GM? The asking price for any new GM worth their salt is going to be very high for the Sabres right now. Want some trades? Either the Sabres give up the very, very few good assets they have, or prepare to be fleeced. Unfortunately, whatever happens will need to be on the genius side of clever or shockingly expensive to be satisfying, or else it will be under-whelming. I think there's more chaos happening within the organization than any of us have guessed. I think each player in this drama (not the actual players on the roster) has etched out a stance and has been sticking with it, including TPegs. But now that outward appearances are clearly spinning out of control, the inner struggles are on fire. Anyway, this is a long-winded way of saying I think we'll finally get some change, but it's not as easy as pushing a few buttons - which is what Black said.
Patty16 Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 What have those "changes" amounted to? You said until changes are made. They have been. They signed two of the 3 biggest offseason FAs, hired more asst coaches, etc. It has amounted to nothing yet. Maybe that disproves your point that change for the sake of change gets your somewhere?
spndnchz Posted January 19, 2012 Report Posted January 19, 2012 Damn that's harsh. At least he's not a land developer.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.