ExiledInIllinois Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 No. Once again I am guilty of scoreboard watching and caught this about tonight's (BFLO@ATL) game recap @ NHL.com: The Thrashers, first in the Southeast Division, dropped 10 points behind Buffalo in the conference standings with their third straight loss. Atlanta went 2-3-1 during a homestand at Philips Arena and now heads off on a six-game road trip, its longest this season. Doesn't anybody proof at NHL.com or better yet grasp the concept of OT/SO's and what they are worth in the standings? The mocking birds were 8 games behind... Now with this SO LOSS they are 9 points behind BFLO (BFLO has a game in hand)... Maybe there is a job for me reading the work before they post it? :D
Doohicksie Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 The mocking birds were 8 games behind... Now with this SO LOSS they are 9 points behind BFLO (BFLO has a game in hand)... Maybe there is a job for me reading the work before they post it? :D Games? They are points. Before you get your panties in a knot, make sure you don't make mistakes in your own work.
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Games? They are points. Before you get your panties in a knot, make sure you don't make mistakes in your own work. :censored: !! :oops: :lol: :lol: Would you believe I purposely put that there? :nana: :nana: Okay... I didn't... Karma is a b*tch! Before I posted... I probably checked my post 3 times in nervous fear I was making the same mistake... I guess I am not "proof reader material..."... I never claimed to be a pro... I guess NHL.com employes hacks just like me... :beer: My bad! Games? They are points. Before you get your panties in a knot, make sure you don't make mistakes in your own work. Oh... One more thing, just noticed... Mine was purely a brain-fart... The next sentence has me using points (9 points)... I may beg to differ with NHL.com's alibi! :nana:
Doohicksie Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Oh, I realize what you meant, but I always find it funny when someone corrects someone else and in the process of doing so makes a similar (brainfarty :oops: ) mistake.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.