Allan in MD Posted December 3, 2006 Report Posted December 3, 2006 The "O" in Ovechkin stands for zero, as in the head. If the league doesn't suspend that fool big time, they are a bunch of pansies. Every replay of the assault is more scary than the last. Of course, since Danny returned, Ovechkin will likely get nada ($100 fine) from the league. And by the way, the Caps announcers, especially the "O" Craig Laughlin, have nothing to say about the Ovechkin hit and aftermath other than Gaustad has alot of nerve entering the fray from out of nowhere. To quote Laughlin about the assault, "he didn't mean to do it."
hopeleslyobvious Posted December 3, 2006 Report Posted December 3, 2006 The "O" in Ovechkin stands for zero, as in the head. If the league doesn't suspend that fool big time, they are a bunch of pansies. Every replay of the assault is more scary than the last. Of course, since Danny returned, Ovechkin will likely get nada ($100 fine) from the league. And by the way, the Caps announcers, especially the "O" Craig Laughlin, have nothing to say about the Ovechkin hit and aftermath other than Gaustad has alot of nerve entering the fray from out of nowhere. To quote Laughlin about the assault, "he didn't mean to do it." I wonder how they would have reacted if Ovechkin was the one who got hit?
Mr.Christopher Posted December 3, 2006 Report Posted December 3, 2006 I wonder how they would have reacted if Ovechkin was the one who got hit? They would call the FBI to have Gaustad arrested on charges of attempted murder.
hopeleslyobvious Posted December 3, 2006 Report Posted December 3, 2006 They would call the FBI to have Gaustad arrested on charges of attempted murder. :lol:
Saber61 Posted December 3, 2006 Report Posted December 3, 2006 They would call the FBI to have Gaustad arrested on charges of attempted murder. its sooo true though... gotta protect the 'ticket sellers' that play on the ice :thumbdown:
apuszczalowski Posted December 4, 2006 Report Posted December 4, 2006 To quote Laughlin about the assault, "he didn't mean to do it." Neither did Bertuzzi, or anyone else who does something that injured or could have seriously injured someone else. Its always the first excuse when someone does something wrong. Maybe OJ didn't mean to kill 2 people, does it make it any less wrong?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.