Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said:

If it's a s**t show, the players ought to look in the mirror because they play the games.

Dude I’m honestly jealous. Like this is the management team you’ve been waiting for, in all seriousness - not snark. The offseason talking point is, indeed, “we assembled a fine team, they f*cked up coming in out of shape”

 

Like, you actually got it: your management team is bulletproof to results mattering 

They used “the players came in overconfident” last season - so they are literally running back excuses now 

as far as I am concerned, fans looking to measure by the metrics the rest of the league does (ie standings) should be made aware they are welcome in the fan base, but a clear minority: they are welcome to root for wins, but that’s not what we are interested in doing here in buffalo 

Edited by Thorner
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, North Buffalo said:

Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in?

Because then it can’t be used as an excuse at season’s end 

get out of here with your iron-clad logic 

Edited by Thorner
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

Don't know if the team is allowed to organize that in the off-season.  The players would need to take it upon themselves to do it, hence the comments encouraging to do so from management.

That said, the problem wasn't conditioning this year, the problem was roster construction and players too young to play outside their character.

If you draft a bunch of finesse players and throw them on the ice at 21 or 22 years old, they're going to play like a finesse team.  Telling them to lift weights isn't going to change that.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jad1 said:

Don't know if the team is allowed to organize that in the off-season.  The players would need to take it upon themselves to do it, hence the comments encouraging to do so from management.

That said, the problem wasn't conditioning this year, the problem was roster construction and players too young to play outside their character.

If you draft a bunch of finesse players and throw them on the ice at 21 or 22 years old, they're going to play like a finesse team.  Telling them to lift weights isn't going to change that.

This doesn’t seem to be the messaging they are going with 

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, North Buffalo said:

Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in?

A number of players don’t live in the country. I don’t believe the organization has the authority to require the players to periodically call them back to be checked on.

Posted
1 minute ago, Thorner said:

This doesn’t seem to be the messaging they are going with 

Adams?  Nah, wormtongue will spin it to get a few more years from Terry.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, North Buffalo said:

Um why dont season have offseason training in Buffalo say every 2-3 weeks just evaluate where these guys are at... give them a month off then bring them all in?

The reasoning given back at the B&GI's was that per the CBA the team can't force them to stay in Buffalo in the off-season (that rings true) and that they had limited communications with the individual player's personal trainers in the off-season as well (which didn't seem as true).  At that, Ruff said that he plans on taking a significantly different approach to the off-season.  It sounded like he wants the players and team to agree to individualized training plans; which one would've expected was already happening.

Would really like to see the entirety of the coaching staff under Ruff (with the POSSIBLE exception of Bales) canned.  But wouldn't be surprised if they only can some of the training staff (gotta have scapegoats) while bringing the rest of the staff back en masse.

And, can believe that some of the players didn't "train the right way" through the summer as so many of them are kids, they might simply not know any better and the fact that they're pro athletes in their early 20's (for the most part) would have them getting faster and stronger simply by getting closer to their primes.  But IF that is actually the case; then a WHOLE lot of management and the hockey department need to be gone; because THEY aren't kids and SHOULD know their roles within a professional athletic program.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, jad1 said:

Don't know if the team is allowed to organize that in the off-season.  The players would need to take it upon themselves to do it, hence the comments encouraging to do so from management.

That said, the problem wasn't conditioning this year, the problem was roster construction and players too young to play outside their character.

If you draft a bunch of finesse players and throw them on the ice at 21 or 22 years old, they're going to play like a finesse team.  Telling them to lift weights isn't going to change that.

Which players were these?

Posted
36 minutes ago, Taro T said:

The reasoning given back at the B&GI's was that per the CBA the team can't force them to stay in Buffalo in the off-season (that rings true) and that they had limited communications with the individual player's personal trainers in the off-season as well (which didn't seem as true).  At that, Ruff said that he plans on taking a significantly different approach to the off-season.  It sounded like he wants the players and team to agree to individualized training plans; which one would've expected was already happening.

Would really like to see the entirety of the coaching staff under Ruff (with the POSSIBLE exception of Bales) canned.  But wouldn't be surprised if they only can some of the training staff (gotta have scapegoats) while bringing the rest of the staff back en masse.

And, can believe that some of the players didn't "train the right way" through the summer as so many of them are kids, they might simply not know any better and the fact that they're pro athletes in their early 20's (for the most part) would have them getting faster and stronger simply by getting closer to their primes.  But IF that is actually the case; then a WHOLE lot of management and the hockey department need to be gone; because THEY aren't kids and SHOULD know their roles within a professional athletic program.

Just an immense lack of wisdom in the positions of authority. It starts with the owner.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

Just an immense lack of wisdom in the positions of authority. It starts with the owner.

Fair read.

Another thing that was interesting at the B&GI's was Ruff saying (and am paraphrasing here) when asked about leadership from the players (in relation to 1 of the leaders getting traded and another being healthy scratched earlier in the year) that things look different from inside the organization than from outside and his preconceived notions on some of the players that he'd developed from playing against them were off.   And he did mention how the team did have a lot of leadership, mentioning Greenway and Zucker by name as guys that helped the team's leadership group; personally got the impression that if he had it to do over again he'd likely have either just gone with Dahlin, Tuch, and Thompson as the captains (C,A,A) or added the other 2 mentioned to those 3.

  • Thanks (+1) 2
Posted

They came back from Europe with two regulation losses vs NJ in their luggage. Never recovered from that quite honestly. Two games in and it felt like the season was over.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Taro T said:

The reasoning given back at the B&GI's was that per the CBA the team can't force them to stay in Buffalo in the off-season (that rings true) and that they had limited communications with the individual player's personal trainers in the off-season as well (which didn't seem as true).  At that, Ruff said that he plans on taking a significantly different approach to the off-season.  It sounded like he wants the players and team to agree to individualized training plans; which one would've expected was already happening.

Would really like to see the entirety of the coaching staff under Ruff (with the POSSIBLE exception of Bales) canned.  But wouldn't be surprised if they only can some of the training staff (gotta have scapegoats) while bringing the rest of the staff back en masse.

And, can believe that some of the players didn't "train the right way" through the summer as so many of them are kids, they might simply not know any better and the fact that they're pro athletes in their early 20's (for the most part) would have them getting faster and stronger simply by getting closer to their primes.  But IF that is actually the case; then a WHOLE lot of management and the hockey department need to be gone; because THEY aren't kids and SHOULD know their roles within a professional athletic program.

I said it months ago and I still expect to see Peca on this coaching staff next season. The rags have to clean house at this point, right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I like Lindy but I honestly don't care what his initial analysis is from him or the players. This season was a failure of epic proportions. Roster construction is flawed more than the O rings on the Challenger. In what world does a 30+ goal scorer have to take ot upon himself to stand for his teammates? I hate this team and the 35,000 foot retrospective overlay only makes it worse. F them. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...