Thorner Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 7 minutes ago, Freeezo said: Addition by subtraction I’m losing track of the amount of times this has been uttered when does the addition come? Quote
BlowLeafsBlow123 Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 6 minutes ago, bob_sauve28 said: Maturity? Low hockey sense ... which has always been his issue even going back to juniors. The fact that the Sens traded a center to get him shows they'll use him there. Huge mistake. Quote
Thorner Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 (edited) 4 minutes ago, dudacek said: It's weird to me that we went so quickly from: 3 emerging top 6 centres (Thompson, Cozens, Mitts) and maybe 4 more guys coming (Savoie, Östlund, Kulich, Krebs) To: 1 oft-injured top 6 centre (Norris) and maybe 2 guys coming (Kulich, Östlund) I hate Tage as a winger and I hate how they've moved away from him with Tuch on Line One and as the focus of the PP. Maybe Norris can run a 2nd line, and allow us to bring back the Tuch/Thompson combo on line 2? Thompson Tuch on line 1 you mean? Ya possibly wouldn’t really like look of all left shot Norris line though. Edited March 7 by Thorner Quote
Justin C Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 8 minutes ago, Thorner said: Peterka - Thompson - Kulich Greenway - Norris - Tuch ..good? Is there a stylistic fit here? it’s lacking playmaking. Peterka and Tuch I suppose I’d be much more comfortable with Greenway in a Bottom 6 role. I think you have 3 of your Top 6 on the team next year here currently: Thompson, Tuch and one of Peterka/Quinn. Possibly Kulich if he takes the next step. I have no issues with a botttom 6 of Greenway/Zucker/McLeod/Kozak to start with. Norris down here or Kulich is a plus too. Quote
Thorner Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Sounds like a trigger man for a team with a depth of play drivers whoops Quote
LGR4GM Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 Just now, Thorner said: Sounds like a trigger man for a team with a depth of play drivers whoops Just need Michael Misa and Noah Östlund up next year. I am kidding Just now, Brawndo said: Why are we giving up a 2nd? Quote
HumanSlinky39 Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Brawndo said: We're giving up a 2nd? The ferk? Quote
Thorner Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 2 minutes ago, Justin C said: I’d be much more comfortable with Greenway in a Bottom 6 role. I think you have 3 of your Top 6 on the team next year here currently: Thompson, Tuch and one of Peterka/Quinn. Possibly Kulich if he takes the next step. I have no issues with a botttom 6 of Greenway/Zucker/McLeod/Kozak to start with. Norris down here or Kulich is a plus too. Who are the other 3 that make up the top 6 then? Already granted Kulich.. the top 6 doesn’t promote confidence at this time Quote
DarthEbriate Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, Thorner said: I’m losing track of the amount of times this has been uttered when does the addition come? The addition ... is the subtraction. It is Buffalo's destiny to bring balance to the Concept of the Cup. 2 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 There's still a chance that 2026 2nd is pick 64 in the draft! 2 1 Quote
inkman Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 I know Gilbert doesn’t really move the needle but why is this org constantly removing any toughness that exists on the roster. It’s maddening. 5 Quote
Weave Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 Don’t like losing the only glove dropper on the team. Oh well. and if Cozens ever figures it out he is gonna be a nightmare with Tay-chuck. 2 Quote
inkman Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 Just now, Ogelthorpe said: Adams playing checkers again. Fleeced 1 1 1 Quote
Ross Rhea Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Ogelthorpe said: Adams playing checkers again. Fleeced yup Quote
LGR4GM Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 Just now, inkman said: I know Gilbert doesn’t really move the needle but why is this org constantly removing any toughness that exists on the roster. It’s maddening. madness you say? Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 why trade Buffalo native Gilbert? I thought he played well when given the chance 2 1 Quote
Thorner Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 3 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: The addition ... is the subtraction. It is Buffalo's destiny to bring balance to the Concept of the Cup. I preferred when the mystic intangibles remained exactly that. Rather than given a name and counted on specifically Our addition by subtraction is off the chart. Not even master Yoda has a count that high 1 Quote
Brawndo Posted March 7 Author Report Posted March 7 6 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Just need Michael Misa and Noah Östlund up next year. I am kidding Why are we giving up a 2nd? I think the second is for Bernard Docker??? Quote
Mr. Allen Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 Can’t believe Adams gave up that 2nd. How embarrassing for him. 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.