Flashsabre Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago Serious question. I think with the better structure the Amerks might take it.😳 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Flashsabre said: Serious question. I think with the better structure the Amerks might take it.😳 Sabres. It wouldn't be that close. This is like when ppl say the Ohio State Natty team would beat the Titans. They wouldn't. Each level you go up the talent compresses. 4 Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Thorner said: Sabres would destroy them In a series, but in a one game exhibition with a hot Levi in goal?  Quote
Thorner Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 3 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: In a series, but in a one game exhibition with a hot Levi in goal?  The ability of guys like Thompson to snipe corners at the nhl level is one of the biggest reasons Levi has struggled in making the transition. In a one game anything can happen but I’d be surprised 2 Quote
Flashsabre Posted 15 hours ago Author Report Posted 15 hours ago With these gutless f&$@s I’d actually take the Amerks. They play a system and with heart. Sabres don’t play for each other, the D stinks and Amerks get the advantage in net. Quote
Mr. Allen Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago I can’t believe you would actually ask that question.  I thought you were one of the smarter posters.  Sabres would destroy the Amerks.  Wouldn’t be close.  1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Flashsabre said: With these gutless f&$@s I’d actually take the Amerks. They play a system and with heart. Sabres don’t play for each other, the D stinks and Amerks get the advantage in net. The Sabres are faster, more skilled, more experienced, and their defense is better than Rochesters Quote
Flashsabre Posted 14 hours ago Author Report Posted 14 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Mr. Allen said: I can’t believe you would actually ask that question.  I thought you were one of the smarter posters.  Sabres would destroy the Amerks.  Wouldn’t be close.  I know in reality the NHL team would win but you have an NHL team that doesn’t care and an AHL team that is the exact opposite. Purely on talent Sabres win but if you throw heart, passion and structure it would be a lot closer then it should be. It’s a damnation of the NHL franchise Quote
OverPowerYou Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago Sabres barely win the series 4-3. Probably in overtime on accident Quote
SabreFinn Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago Except from a few real NHLers, the Sabres during the tanking years were pretty much this years Rochester. Quote
mjd1001 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Sabres would win 4 games to none. I'd guess 3 of the games are blowouts. One might be closer due to good goaltending by the Roch guy or "puck luck". Quote
JP51 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Look, this team is a horror show... just absolutely despisable and unwatchable... but the Ice Capades would beat the Amerks 4-0 ... Hot Levi or not... we used to get this question alot with College football... Could Alabama or Georgia beat the worst NFL team... the reality is Alabama or Georgia may have 5 or 6 players out of 90 that could play in the NFL ... the Amerks may have 1 or 2 players that are currently 3 or 4th line NHL ready... maybe 3 or 4 others that have a shot in the next couple of years to be ready... its just not a realistic scenario...  Edited 2 hours ago by JP51 1 Quote
thewookie1 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Barring Levi channeling Hasek, it'd be a 1 sided Sabres series that goes 4-0. In that rare chance Levi stands on his head and plays otherworldly, I'll give them 1 win which still has the Sabres winning 4-1. (Effectively the only position that could theoretically give the AHL team any prayer at winning a game much less a series falls upon the goalie who could be nearly NHL caliber and or a young up incomer)   Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Dahlin and Thompson agaisnt AHL players wouldn't be fair. Like Canada or the US playing Switzerland in the Olympics. Quote
Weave Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago This is absurd.  All you need to know to predict an outcome is the performance of Aube-Kubel since he’s been sent down.  Very good AHLer, invisible NHLer.  The gulf between mediocre NHLers and good AHLers is wide and deep. Quote
SwampD Posted 59 minutes ago Report Posted 59 minutes ago Everyone is overlooking the obvious. The fact that the question was even asked is the real point of this thread. This team stinks. I can't believe that Cozens is at 350 games. Pegula has killed hockey in Buffalo. Quote
mjd1001 Posted 53 minutes ago Report Posted 53 minutes ago If they did play an exhibition game vs each other, they only way to make it fair or competitive would be to do something like this: -2 of the 3 of Tage, Tuch, and Dahlin get a day off. -Reimer plays in net vs Levi -A couple Sabres guys who were recently in the AHL get to play for Rochester. Kulich for sure plays for Rochester. You might get a somewhat competitive game if you do that. Quote
Hawerchuk Posted 24 minutes ago Report Posted 24 minutes ago Sabres would sweep it vs Amerks, no doubt. and Ohio State 10, Tennessee Titans 60. No way, no how a top college team would beat the worst NFL team. Not gonna happen. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.