Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Ok and? He won that election and Comey committed election interference that cost Hillary the election with a fake investigation into nothing. 

So what this shows us is Trump is a petty, insecure child, who puts his personal grievances above national security and world security. 

Curious to see the details but Trump won't honor the agreement anyways. He'll always want more.

What's with the and? I shared something I came across regarding Trump and Ukraine, in a thread titled Trump and Ukraine, without comment or endorsement. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank said:

What's with the and? I shared something I came across regarding Trump and Ukraine, in a thread titled Trump and Ukraine, without comment or endorsement. 

I was unclear how that impacts trumps actions currently. 

The okay and? Was a poor choice on my part. Apologies

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Hank said:

What's with the and? I shared something I came across regarding Trump and Ukraine, in a thread titled Trump and Ukraine, without comment or endorsement. 

Because if you don’t end every post with nazi or fascist then by default you are endorsing Trump 😂 

  • dislike 1
Posted
On 2/19/2025 at 8:16 PM, SABRES 0311 said:

The fact you don’t understand what reparations are but use it to back up an insult is funny 😂 

I haven't even remotely indicated that I don't know what reparations are. The fact that you say something over and over doesn't make it true. But that is the Trumpian way. Lie, lie, lie, and people will eventually believe it.

 

On 2/19/2025 at 8:16 PM, SABRES 0311 said:

You seem to also lack an understanding that the U.S. maintains economic and diplomatic ties with another adversary, China. If you did you would see that relationships with near peer countries isn’t simping. It’s holding some balance while still maintaining/establishing dominance in politics, economics, and multiple domains of military capabilities. 

 

I asked you to connect the logic. Since you can't, you resort to "you lack an understanding". So, this tells me you can't follow the logical steps that resulted in your conclusion *or* that your conclusion was a lie and that you knew there was no way to logically connect the two. Either way, you failed spectacularly.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, JujuFish said:

I haven't even remotely indicated that I don't know what reparations are. The fact that you say something over and over doesn't make it true. But that is the Trumpian way. Lie, lie, lie, and people will eventually believe it.

 

 

I asked you to connect the logic. Since you can't, you resort to "you lack an understanding". So, this tells me you can't follow the logical steps that resulted in your conclusion *or* that your conclusion was a lie and that you knew there was no way to logically connect the two. Either way, you failed spectacularly.

 

You want me to connect the dots when you don’t know the difference between reparations and strong armed trade negotiations.

Posted (edited)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-administration-officials-decline-russia-started-ukraine-war-rcna193357

Quote

Asked during an interview with “Fox News Sunday” host Shannon Bream whether it was fair to say Russia attacked Ukraine unprovoked three years ago tomorrow, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said it was “fair to say it’s a very complicated situation.”

Earlier in the Fox News interview, Hegseth said he did not “need to get into the characterization of — we know who invaded who. We understand the stakes of this game.”

yikes

Edited by LGR4GM
Posted
14 hours ago, JujuFish said:

I haven't even remotely indicated that I don't know what reparations are. The fact that you say something over and over doesn't make it true. But that is the Trumpian way. Lie, lie, lie, and people will eventually believe it.

 

 

I asked you to connect the logic. Since you can't, you resort to "you lack an understanding". So, this tells me you can't follow the logical steps that resulted in your conclusion *or* that your conclusion was a lie and that you knew there was no way to logically connect the two. Either way, you failed spectacularly.

 

 

13 hours ago, SABRES 0311 said:

You want me to connect the dots when you don’t know the difference between reparations and strong armed trade negotiations.

Either you two engage in an attempt to come to an understanding of each other or just drop it, please.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Disgusting conduct from the United States here:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/24/politics/us-joins-russia-ukraine-un-vote/index.html

Quote

The United States joined Russia to vote against a UN General Assembly resolution condemning Russia’s war against Ukraine Monday in a stunning shift from years of US policy.

The vote against the Ukrainian and European-backed resolution saw the US at odds with its longtime European allies and instead aligned with the aggressor in the war on the three-year anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

I think we have enough evidence at this stage to know Trump plans to abandon our allies, make a deal with Russia, and divide up the mineral rights in Ukraine to benefit himself and his handler Elon Musk. Disgusting behavior and truly the downfall of American ideals of freedom and democracy. Refusing to name Russia as the aggressor, when they literally invaded another country, is such a low bar to clear that the fact the Trump administration refuses to, makes it all the more damning. Trump will emulate Putin and the US will fall into a hollow oligarchy. 

We are rapidly approaching the Rubicon. 

Edited by LGR4GM
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Disgusting conduct from the United States here:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/24/politics/us-joins-russia-ukraine-un-vote/index.html

I think we have enough evidence at this stage to know Trump plans to abandon our allies, make a deal with Russia, and divide up the mineral rights in Ukraine to benefit himself and his handler Elon Musk. Disgusting behavior and truly the downfall of American ideals of freedom and democracy. Refusing to name Russia as the aggressor, when they literally invaded another country, is such a low bar to clear that the fact the Trump administration refuses to, makes it all the more damning. Trump will emulate Putin and the US will fall into a hollow oligarchy. 

We are rapidly approaching the Rubicon. 

Sad day for America. 

Posted
12 hours ago, K-9 said:

 Trump continues to lie about the amount of assistance we gave to Ukraine as he keeps insisting that it’s $350b when it’s not even close to that. 
 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fact-checking-trumps-claims-amount-us-aid-ukraine/story?id=119167409

 

Isn’t that what Trump got impeached for, one of the two times? He did not give Ukraine the money that our congress put into law that the US would give them.

And can they please stop calling it a war? It was and is an invasion.

At first, I thought Trump was a puppet for Putin. Then I thought that Putin was doing Trump’s dirty work in Ukraine. Now I believe they are both Musk’s henchmen.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SwampD said:

Isn’t that what Trump got impeached for, one of the two times? He did not give Ukraine the money that our congress put into law that the US would give them.

And can they please stop calling it a war? It was and is an invasion.

At first, I thought Trump was a puppet for Putin. Then I thought that Putin was doing Trump’s dirty work in Ukraine. Now I believe they are both Musk’s henchmen.

They should be viewed as self interested narcissists one and all. Their interests all align on this issue so they all have no issue putting aside ethics in order to see it done. They are like the Triumvirate at the end of the Roman Republic. As long as the each member saw a benefit to maintaining the alliance, it continued. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SwampD said:

Isn’t that what Trump got impeached for, one of the two times? He did not give Ukraine the money that our congress put into law that the US would give them.

And can they please stop calling it a war? It was and is an invasion.

At first, I thought Trump was a puppet for Putin. Then I thought that Putin was doing Trump’s dirty work in Ukraine. Now I believe they are both Musk’s henchmen.

His first impeachment was related to Ukraine, but the withholding of the aid committed by Congress was only a part of it. In a nutshell, he tried to bribe Ukraine in exchange for false stories about Biden. If you have the time or inclination, it’s all in the link below, but it’s a slog imo. 
 

https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres755/BILLS-116hres755enr.pdf

Posted
3 hours ago, SwampD said:

Isn’t that what Trump got impeached for, one of the two times? He did not give Ukraine the money that our congress put into law that the US would give them.

And can they please stop calling it a war? It was and is an invasion.

At first, I thought Trump was a puppet for Putin. Then I thought that Putin was doing Trump’s dirty work in Ukraine. Now I believe they are both Musk’s henchmen.

Genuinely intrigued by this thought.

Can it not be a war that was started by an invasion?  Would we have to call the Gulf War the Iraq Invasion? 

100% not throwing shade, but trying to assess your division of the two terms.

Posted
2 hours ago, LTS said:

Genuinely intrigued by this thought.

Can it not be a war that was started by an invasion?  Would we have to call the Gulf War the Iraq Invasion? 

100% not throwing shade, but trying to assess your division of the two terms.

Wars start by invasion. Invader invades, invader occupies, host nation repels invader. 

War as a continuation of politics by other (violent) means is the act of two belligerent groups trying to impose their will on the other.

Ex: Russia imposing their will through occupation. Ukraine imposing their will through repelling an invading/occupying force.

Posted

Turns out that Obama’s team including Anthony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, Susan Rice, and Alexander Vindman advised Zelensky to reject Trump’s deal. ***** traitorous *****!! I hope Bondi can find cause to bring charges against them!

×
×
  • Create New...