Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, GoPuckYourself said:

I seem to be in the minority but I stopped watch the Olympics because they always seem boring to me. This 4 nations was entertaining, I knew it was going to be really good 5 minutes into the game and i was hooked even the Swede's/Fins game was good but not as fun as the Canada/US imo. It was the most entertained I may have ever been for a hockey game, the fights just set the tone for that entire game and it's a shame so many of our guys got injured as i would have liked to see if the outcome would be different.

Injuries? You mean like Shea Theodore or Josh Morrissey? 🙄

Posted
5 hours ago, Thorner said:

It’s not that he isn’t bad if you want to win the cup. It’s that we have proof he’s good enough to be your best player when you win the cup 

“I’m so sad we had to settle for a guy capable of leading the Stanley cup playoffs in points while playing a dominant 2 way game”

Not going back through the thread but is someone trying to downplay Eichel as a JAG on the cup winning Vegas team?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Thorner said:

I am Canadian, dude. We don’t think it’s as big 

Almost no one does. You totally can - but you have to have some awareness for the conversation. Just go read - it’s not being counted as akin to 2010 

It still feels big! 

But people literally do put the Golden Goal up there with Henderson 

Seems bigger where I live. There's a patriotism around here I've never seen before, and I'm pretty old. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

https://athlonsports.com/nhl/botched-national-anthem-before-canada-usa-sparks-strong-reaction
 

more Canadian anthem stuff.  The singer is Canadian and she changed a lyric to mean something that seems very odd to me.  From a musical perspective, I don’t think she did a good job at all.  

That anthem is great. Stop messing with it. 
 

Edit: But that article is trash. It doesn’t even correctly quote what she said. 

Edited by shrader
Posted
13 minutes ago, shrader said:

That anthem is great. Stop messing with it. 
 

Edit: But that article is trash. It doesn’t even correctly quote what she said. 

I’m not messing with anything.  Just posted something that was talked about here, specifically how the anthem words were changed around 1980, and again more recently.   

Lighten up Francis. 
 

.  
 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

I’m not messing with anything.  Just posted something that was talked about here, specifically how the anthem words were changed around 1980, and again more recently.   

Lighten up Francis. 
 

.  
 

So wait, you’re not the woman who sang the anthem? Of course I wasn’t saying you were messing with it. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said:

I don't agree.  I think this one was bigger  for Canada.   Both great but no one was threatening us with annexation in 2010

I think it was trolling Trudeau more so than threatening.  Regardless it did add to the environment and made for great entertainment. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Mr Peabody said:

I think it was trolling Trudeau more so than threatening.  Regardless it did add to the environment and made for great entertainment. 

I don't like the trolling.  Especially of a good neighbor and a friend.   The USA could not get a better neighbor than what we already have. 

The hockey was going to be great entertainment without the Trump trolling.  The teams were going to be fired up no matter what.  

Trump could have gotten help at the boarder, if this is really all he wanted, with a simple private call and a meeting to negotiate an agreement that benefits both countries.  He could play hardball in the conference room if need be, not on the world stage and not by saying ridiculous things.    Grandstanding in the media to fire up a base that is already loyal to him is a bad tactic that leads to poor policy.   

I better stop here.  

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Crusader1969 said:

100% agree.  Definitely bigger here in the GTA. 

Gotta have something to get riled up about there other than Maple Leaf playoff flameouts year after year I guess. 😂

Posted
1 hour ago, Crusader1969 said:

I don't agree.  I think this one was bigger  for Canada.   Both great but no one was threatening us with annexation in 2010

It’s not. Sorry 

Big goal though! 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said:

We can agree to disagree. This one was way bigger 

You can call it bigger than Hendersons if you want, too: you’d still be wrong. You are in the vast, VAST minority. Crosby’s is considered bigger, but you don’t agree personally. That’s ok! 

you literally can’t find polling online that doesn’t have the Sid goal vastly ahead 

Edited by Thorner
Posted
10 minutes ago, Thorner said:

You can call it bigger than Hendersons if you want, too: you’d still be wrong. You are in the vast, VAST minority. Crosby’s is considered bigger, but you don’t agree personally. That’s ok! 

you literally can’t find polling online that doesn’t have the Sid goal vastly ahead 

In 2010 we were still vastly better than the USA and fully expected to win.   
our defence was Daughty, Keith, Pronger, Niedermayer, Weaber and Seabrook. 
the centre spine was Crosby, Bergeron, Toews, Thorton and Getzlaf 

USA had nothing in comparison at that time.   

This time , there would be an arguement of which team was better on paper and we had the threat of economic war hanging overhead.
 

24 minutes ago, Thorner said:

It’s not. Sorry 

Big goal though! 

Maybe the word I should have used was "important" rather than bigger?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said:

In 2010 we were still vastly better than the USA and fully expected to win.   
our defence was Daughty, Keith, Pronger, Niedermayer, Weaber and Seabrook. 
the centre spine was Crosby, Bergeron, Toews, Thorton and Getzlaf 

USA had nothing in comparison at that time.   

This time , there would be an arguement of which team was better on paper and we had the threat of economic war hanging overhead.
 

Maybe the word I should have used was "important" rather than bigger?

You are focusing too much on USA specifically. Canada was coming off a loss in 2006 in Turin, we had to re-prove against everyone. Canada won the most recent best on best headed into 4 nations

look, if this was the biggest goal ever for you - all power to you. It was great, the tournament was really fun. Me thinks we are starting to conflate the 4 nations coming in well ahead of expectations with being the Olympics. Maybe the 4 nations becomes the premiere tournament one day, but it has a long ways to go. It may never be played again. Again, it was only 4 teams. That alone gives the Olympics a level of prestige 

let’s see in 15 years if it’s still being talked about as the biggest ever 

Posted

I will say the Crosby goal was a FAR bigger dagger to my American (but very respectful of Canadians) heart. Ryan Miller willed that team to the Gold Medal game. He was brilliant. Everyone knew the US had no business being in OT for the Gold without Miller. To see it end sorta casually with a funny shot from a weird angle was devastating. 

I think knowing the US blew their one chance made it worse. I feel like the US will be a factor in the medal rounds of international hockey far more frequently going forward.

Posted
3 hours ago, Pimlach said:

https://athlonsports.com/nhl/botched-national-anthem-before-canada-usa-sparks-strong-reaction
 

more Canadian anthem stuff.  The singer is Canadian and she changed a lyric to mean something that seems very odd to me.  From a musical perspective, I don’t think she did a good job at all.  

Yeah that sucked pretty bad. One of the worst renditions of the anthem I’ve witnessed. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Thorner said:

You are focusing too much on USA specifically. Canada was coming off a loss in 2006 in Turin, we had to re-prove against everyone. Canada won the most recent best on best headed into 4 nations

look, if this was the biggest goal ever for you - all power to you. It was great, the tournament was really fun. Me thinks we are starting to conflate the 4 nations coming in well ahead of expectations with being the Olympics. Maybe the 4 nations becomes the premiere tournament one day, but it has a long ways to go. It may never be played again. Again, it was only 4 teams. That alone gives the Olympics a level of prestige 

let’s see in 15 years if it’s still being talked about as the biggest ever 

I think you are ignoring the political aspect of the game.  Which you simply shouldn't 

  • Agree 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said:

I think you are ignoring the political aspect of the game.  Which you simply shouldn't 

I’m not, that’s what has me placing the goal as high as I am tbh, as manufactured as a lot of that controversy was. I think I just ranked it 5th - not bad for a tournament that was a non entity almost no matter who you asked, 2 weeks ago 

Posted
3 hours ago, Mr Peabody said:

I think it was trolling Trudeau more so than threatening.  Regardless it did add to the environment and made for great entertainment. 

and that's what world leaders should do? troll other world leaders? I'll just let you ponder for yourself what the normalization of a lot of this is doing. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Pimlach said:

https://athlonsports.com/nhl/botched-national-anthem-before-canada-usa-sparks-strong-reaction
 

more Canadian anthem stuff.  The singer is Canadian and she changed a lyric to mean something that seems very odd to me.  From a musical perspective, I don’t think she did a good job at all.  

Interesting that the article calls it "botched" when it was a deliberate change. Agree with it or not is your choice but it wasn't "botched", she changed it to ONLY US command as an obvious message. This is the first place I've seen it viewed negatively. It's gotten positive reactions overall. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
On 2/21/2025 at 6:48 AM, French Collection said:

Sorry if I offended you, I just wanted to state that the Hughes gang is more suited to skills competitions.

They needed more Larkins and Slavins.

Not offended. Or pearl clutching as someone else said. It’s just that women are capable beings. It’s like when the Sedins were called sisters. It was so stupid. I just think we should all do better.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...