Jump to content

GDT: Blue Jackets @ Sabres Feb 4, 2025 - 7:00PM, MSG πŸ“Ί, WGR550 πŸ“» πŸŽ™


Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, Thorner said:

Like I mentioned in the other thread, at rate we are going we might find ourselves on the pace we need, find ourselves pulled even if we turn this 4 gamer into an 18 game streak.

There’s no stopping at 18. It’ll be 30. I will continue to beat this into the ground as long as I can.Β 

  • Agree 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Thorner said:

Better go 22-7 and win the tiebreaker

23 minutes ago, Thorner said:

at rate we are going we might find ourselves on the pace we need, find ourselves pulled even if we turn this 4 gamer into an 18 game streak.

giphy.gif

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

Β 

And this kids is why we will be drafting in the top 10. Joe Marino can act like the playoffs are a possibility but they aren't.Β 

Posted
5 minutes ago, shrader said:

There’s no stopping at 18. It’ll be 30. I will continue to beat this into the ground as long as I can.Β 

wait - is this a bit?

i haven't been around enough to keep this sh1t straight.

Posted
3 hours ago, Broken Ankles said:

Better together, no. Β Just pushing down the lineup. Β Obviously they both perform better on a line with Tage/Tuch/JJP but would each would put a drag on the top two. Β Point is moving them off a top six. Β Based on Ice time deployment and the 7 D and mix and match lines Cozens is Β already a bottom six forward. Β Β 

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/linestats.php?fromseason=20242025&thruseason=20242025&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&rate=n&team=BUF&vteam=ALL&view=wowy&loc=B&gpfilt=none&fd=2024-10-04&td=2025-04-17&tgp=2000&strict=incl&p1=8481528&p2=8482097&p3=0&p4=0&p5=0

Β 

Quinn already isn't in the top 6.Β 

Posted
5 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said:

wait - is this a bit?

i haven't been around enough to keep this sh1t straight.

shrader doesn't do bits. He's a prop comic.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, shrader said:

Message boards are a very difficult medium for my craft.

Yet I know you typed that with one hand while tying off a balloon giraffe with the other.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Stoner said:

Yet I know you typed that with one hand while tying off a balloon giraffe with the other.

Come on, know your audience. Clearly I was making a sword.Β 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

Crazy thing and frustrating part about this season is the Sabres were 11-9-2 after the California trip and right before the long losing streak, and now 10-7-2 since the 13 game losing streak ended. If the Sabres just held onto 3 leads during that horrendous losing streak, and earn 6 more points like they should have at minimum, this team is close to about where we thought they would be all along, around 55-57 points and 5 points out of the WC spot or so.

Edited by Palm Trees And Taxes
Posted
6 minutes ago, Palm Trees And Taxes said:

Crazy thing and frustrating part about this season is the Sabres were 11-9-2 after the California trip and right before the long losing streak, and now 10-7-2 since the 13 game losing streak ended. If the Sabres just held onto 3 leads during that horrendous losing streak, and earn 6 more points like they should have at minimum, this team is close to about where we thought they would be all along, around 55-57 points and 5 points out of the WC spot or so.

That bread on the losing streak sandwich, those aren’t exactly great numbers. What I see there is a team that has little to no margin of error. Then when you combine that with the largest error imaginable, it doesn’t end well.Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 hours ago, DarthEbriate said:

One argument for Byram to stay on the Sabres on a bridge deal is the ability to play with Dahlin for 2 years, then hit the open market when the cap is $113M.

Agree, a bridge would probably be my preferenceΒ 

Posted
4 hours ago, Doohicksie said:

It would all work if they didn't "fail to clear pucks" imo.Β  Of course I'd like to see them grinding it out down at the other end of the rink but that's just me I guess.

That means win more puck battles, be stronger on the stick, play with head up and don’t panic. They have too many guys that panic and toss the puck around like a hot potato. Β Puck Possession means the other team can’t score. Β 
Β 

A problem with Lindy, and my list is growing, is they lay back to start the period. Β They put pressure on UPL for the entire 3rd period.Β 

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

That means win more puck battles, be stronger on the stick, play with head up and don’t panic. They have too many guys that panic and toss the puck around like a hot potato. Β Puck Possession means the other team can’t score. Β 
Β 

A problem with Lindy, and my list is growing, is they lay back to start the period. Β They put pressure on UPL for the entire 3rd period.Β 

The laying back in the third period really bothered me last night. The strategy and mindset seemed to be let's just hang on and gut it out. It worked last night but it is a fraught strategy to take too often. I attribute this passive strategy to not having enough veterans to be on the ice to deal with the end of game pressure.Β 

Posted
4 hours ago, Jorcus said:

There are only a few forwards on this team I trust to hold the blue line and when you are protecting a lead it becomes more important to think about plays like that.

Forwards I trust to backup a pinching Dman:

  • Tage (speed, wingspan)
  • Kulich
  • Benson
  • Krebs
  • Kozak

Oh, and Girgensons when he was still here.

Posted
6 hours ago, caseydean said:

So that was an interesting take.Β  By putting Olivier out to start the game--seemed unusual-- maybe the Jackets were saying we are going to run you out of the rink you bunch of pu*****.Β  And Gilbert recognized that and dropped the gloves to say "not tonight." Wishful thinking perhaps, but it kind of makes sense.

I don't think so. They all see the media. They all saw people like Spittin' Chicklets mocking the Sabres. They all heard the Sabres saying they met and it won't happen again so if I'm the Columbus coach I'm starting Olivier to say "you have an issue with NJ don't even think about taking it out on our guys". That's why he started.

Gilbert fighting meant nothing imo. Gilbert is a team guy, he's always been a team guy. Limited skill but a good guy. That's never been in question. It might have meant something if during the game Cozens or Tuch or any of the so called "leaders" were scrapping. Not with Olivier, they don't need to be suicidal but just showing that they are capable.Β 

It's all on Adams imo. The team needs to be tougher and they need more real leaders and players who drag you into the fight not run away from it.Β 

Posted

I get the need to stick up for teammates, but the real issue is the lack of strong fundamentals: getting out of own's zone, not taking the third period off (pedal to the metal mentality), having players in front of the other goalie's net, avoiding turnovers, finishing one's checks and situational awareness.Β Β 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...