mjd1001 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 16 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Those are huge jumps for the 2nd and 3rd year. 1 Quote
Thorner Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 (edited) 5 minutes ago, mjd1001 said: Those are huge jumps for the 2nd and 3rd year. So unfortunate here are the sabres, positioned to utilize the cap space they have over all other teams whoops! Waited too long. Cap going way up, relief for everyone Infuriatingly stupid Edited January 31 by Thorner 2 5 Quote
Brawndo Posted January 31 Author Report Posted January 31 7 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said: But what's Terrys "internal" cap? Subtract 10 to 15 million from the cap per year 1 1 Quote
mjd1001 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 (edited) Maybe it will make Cozens $7 per year a little better to another team considering trading for him? Of course with this franchise it'll probably work the other way around....probably make Pegula think Cozens is less of an issue in relation to the cap so they'll justify keeping him even more. If this is a bigger jump that most anticipated, it also makes signing Byram a lot more expensive if Pegula doesn't want to spend the money. Edited January 31 by mjd1001 1 Quote
EM88 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 (edited) I had previously read projections for the cap increases in the next few years and they were considerably less than this. Who does this help? Teams that are right in their cup run window now, but are also up hard against the cap and might have a hard time adding pieces otherwise. This is a gift to many teams, but mostly to Vegas and Toronto in my opinion. Edited January 31 by EM88 Quote
tom webster Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 (edited) So would everyone who thought I was crazy when I said $100M was close and thoughts of the Sabres being in any kind of cap crunch were ridiculous, please form a line? Apologies will go a whole lot faster if you remain orderly. Edited January 31 by tom webster 1 2 Quote
Weave Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 5 minutes ago, tom webster said: So would everyone who thought I was crazy when I said $100K was close and thoughts of the Sabres being in any kind of cap crunch were ridiculous, please form a line? Apologies will go a whole lot faster if you remain orderly. You were steadfast on this subject. You win 18 internets today. 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 18 minutes ago, tom webster said: So would everyone who thought I was crazy when I said $100K was close and thoughts of the Sabres being in any kind of cap crunch were ridiculous, please form a line? Apologies will go a whole lot faster if you remain orderly. you're obligated to keep the receipts, i'm afraid. please feel free to post all names and publicly humiliate those who thusly doubted you. Quote
mjd1001 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 (edited) I'd imagine McDavid's next deal, if longer term, will probably be worth about $17m per year. If it goes that high....is Edmonton still in on it? Edited January 31 by mjd1001 Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 Unless the rise in cap is accompanied by new TV money I'm not aware of, our this news will vastly accelerate our DEATH SPIRAL. Blow 1- Based on how poorly we're doing this year, it'll be a bad one financially. Now that winning multiple cups is no longer this franchise's reason for existence, Terry will tighten the purse strings further. Blow 2- With the have teams of the league ramping up spending and us cutting down towards the floor, we'll be worse next year. There'll be even less butts in seats than before. So you have a floor team, in a market no player wants to go to. We're in full on Oakland A's mode now. Franchise = gone. Quote
Flashsabre Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 Can’t wait for the presser: Reporter: “Kevyn why are the Sabres $25 million under the cap?” Adams: “Read my lips: Absolutely…No…..Financial….Restrictions!!!!!!!”😝 1 Quote
Carmel Corn Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 If Pegula wants to create the illusion that he is spending enough to be competitive, he'll spend to the floor and then have GMKA serve as GM, asst. GM, assoc. GM, trainer, equipment manager and zamboni driver all rolled up into one job to save money elsewhere. He'll have Dunleavy doing both play-by-play and color (no Rob Ray), Duffer doing the host RV and analysis between periods (no more Marty) and play a recording for the pre-game national anthems (no more live singers). Finally, your beer and nachos at the game will require fans to fill out a bank loan request. Quote
French Collection Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 2 hours ago, Crusader1969 said: But what's Terrys "internal" cap? League minimum + 10% Quote
French Collection Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 2 hours ago, Thorner said: So unfortunate here are the sabres, positioned to utilize the cap space they have over all other teams whoops! Waited too long. Cap going way up, relief for everyone Infuriatingly stupid My blood pressure just went up, again. Weaponizing cap space will never be a Sabres strategy. 1 Quote
ska-T Palmtown Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 I just have so much trouble grasping the whole concept of why the Sabres need to be cheap. From a CNBC article: If the Sabres have an estimated revenue of $169M ... assuming 30% taxrate for corps (?) = $118M. Their player payroll is ~$73M this year ... They have almost no debt, where in the ever living FERK is the remaining $45M going???????? Granted my analysis is very crude, but I don't buy for one second this franchise is losing money ... Last year they had a confirmed revenue of around $159M. The concept of a billionaire try to save a few $M here and there on his favorite toy, while his other sports team makes money so fast he can't even count it just seems way way way off. I know most of the board is convinced, based on rumor, speculation, and pure disbelief that anyone could run a franchise this poorly, that T-Pegs has some sort of internal cap. I whole-heartedly disagree. I think the far more likely scenario is that he has asked GMKA to be "smart" with the money and GMKA is playing the "I need cap space to sign all my awesome young kids to contracts" game. 1 Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 No idea either way, but I would think the costs for the non-hockey ops staff, travel costs, rink costs, marketing, etc would add up pretty quick. The flight budget alone seems like it would be significant. Quote
7+6=13 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 3 hours ago, tom webster said: So would everyone who thought I was crazy when I said $100K was close and thoughts of the Sabres being in any kind of cap crunch were ridiculous, please form a line? Apologies will go a whole lot faster if you remain orderly. Are we allowed to ask a question before taking a ticket and getting in line? I'm not sure I disagreed with you then but I'm going to have to challenge you on the $100K now. Quote
tom webster Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 2 hours ago, 7+6=13 said: Are we allowed to ask a question before taking a ticket and getting in line? I'm not sure I disagreed with you then but I'm going to have to challenge you on the $100K now. I’m surprised it took this long to realize I put $100K and not $100M🤷♂️ Quote
ska-T Palmtown Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 3 minutes ago, tom webster said: I’m surprised it took this long to realize I put $100K and not $100M🤷♂️ lol, I saw it, too - but understood the typo and did not feel the need to make a fuss. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 6 hours ago, Thorner said: Poor news for small markets That might be the plan. League not enjoying parity as much as they thought they would. Big markets in the playoffs is big money. I suspect this will make the FA asks get really ridiculous as their agents will start asking for a big piece of all that extra money. Quote
Crusader1969 Posted January 31 Report Posted January 31 6 hours ago, Thorner said: Poor news for small markets Poor news for cheap / disinterested owners 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.