Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been outspoken about my wish to move on from Cozens and McLeod.  I have also been outspoken about my wish for the Sabres to bring in a top 6 forward, preferably a playmaking center.  I have also been outspoken on my belief we need more vets like Zucker not less.   

However, I have been watching the Sabres again lately just to see if there is really any hope left and I have found two players, that are bringing me some hope.  They are Kozak and Kulich.   Kozak brings an honest effort every shift.  He has shown more effort in heart in his 8 games than all of Adams 4th line acquisitions except maybe Malenstyn. 

Kulich just keeps getting better with each game played.  He now has 12 points (8 goals) in 33 games and as many goals as Benson (8, 8, 41 games) and twice that of Krebs (4, 12 46 games).  Kulich also was solidly 9/20 in the face off circle last night.  

If Kozak and Kulich continue to build on this game and others like it, the Sabres just may have their 3rd and 4th line centers for the near future.  

The best news about their ascension is it frees our limited capital to begin to fix the other holes in the lineup like defense and playmaking in the top 6. 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

I have been outspoken about my wish to move on from Cozens and McLeod.  I have also been outspoken about my wish for the Sabres to bring in a top 6 forward, preferably a playmaking center.  I have also been outspoken on my belief we need more vets like Zucker not less.   

However, I have been watching the Sabres again lately just to see if there is really any hope left and I have found two players, that are bringing me some hope.  They are Kozak and Kulich.   Kozak brings an honest effort every shift.  He has shown more effort in heart in his 8 games than all of Adams 4th line acquisitions except maybe Malenstyn. 

Kulich just keeps getting better with each game played.  He now has 12 points (8 goals) in 33 games and as many goals as Benson (8, 8, 41 games) and twice that of Krebs (4, 12 46 games).  Kulich also was solidly 9/20 in the face off circle last night.  

If Kozak and Kulich continue to build on this game and others like it, the Sabres just may have their 3rd and 4th line centers for the near future.  

The best news about their ascension is it frees our limited capital to begin to fix the other holes in the lineup like defense and playmaking in the top 6. 

I think I mentioned a while ago (before Levi was brought up for one game) that I think Kozak is done with the AHL.  Sure he's the easy forward to move if you need to juggle the roster, but I think at this point he's NHL-ready.  He's got the hustle and drive and for a guy just getting his first taste of regular NHL play, he seems very good at not getting bullied around; there were a few times where he got checked hard in the corner but managed to stay on his feet and come away with the puck.  He is also pretty speedy.

I don't expect 20 goals out of him, but I do think he has the ability to tilt the ice toward the opposing goal.

I also think that when it's all said and done, Krebs will be on this team for the long term, and that he will continue improve, albeit at an incremental pace from here on out.

It also seems like JJP and Kulich are starting to build some chemistry.

If we could get Tage, Cozens and Tuch to consistently play with as much heart & hustle as Krebs, Kulich and Kozak, we'd have a team. 

Edited by Doohicksie
Posted

Is everyone good with Kulich at center?  He has twice as many goals as he does assists.  Is that a desired stat line?  I’d rather he play on one of the top 2 lines, regardless of position.  Is McLeod not good enough to play the 4C? 

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, inkman said:

Is everyone good with Kulich at center?  He has twice as many goals as he does assists.  Is that a desired stat line?  I’d rather he play on one of the top 2 lines, regardless of position.  Is McLeod not good enough to play the 4C? 

We have no interest in making the playoffs next year if Kulich lines up in the top 6 to start the year 

Like, zero 

but to answer your question: no it’s not a desired stat line for a C on this particular team, because we don’t seem to have any traditional playmaking centres 

Edited by Thorner
Posted
22 minutes ago, Doohicksie said:

If we could get Tage, Cozens and Tuch to consistently play with as much heart & hustle as Krebs, Kulich and Kozak, we'd have a team. 

Truth.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, inkman said:

Is everyone good with Kulich at center?  He has twice as many goals as he does assists.  Is that a desired stat line?  I’d rather he play on one of the top 2 lines, regardless of position.  Is McLeod not good enough to play the 4C? 

He is, but why pay him $4 mill when Kulich and Kozak combine for 1.6 mill?  

Thompson is the No. 1 C

The Sabres need to find a 2

Kulich 3

Kozak 4

with Krebs as a floater.  

  • Vomit 1
Posted
Just now, GASabresIUFAN said:

He is, but why pay him $4 mill when Kulich and Kozak combine for 1.6 mill?  

Thompson is the No. 1 C

The Sabres need to find a 2

Kulich 3

Kozak 4

with Krebs as a floater.  

Did Adams hack your account 

EEE

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

I have been outspoken about my wish to move on from Cozens and McLeod.  I have also been outspoken about my wish for the Sabres to bring in a top 6 forward, preferably a playmaking center.  I have also been outspoken on my belief we need more vets like Zucker not less.   

However, I have been watching the Sabres again lately just to see if there is really any hope left and I have found two players, that are bringing me some hope.  They are Kozak and Kulich.   Kozak brings an honest effort every shift.  He has shown more effort in heart in his 8 games than all of Adams 4th line acquisitions except maybe Malenstyn. 

Kulich just keeps getting better with each game played.  He now has 12 points (8 goals) in 33 games and as many goals as Benson (8, 8, 41 games) and twice that of Krebs (4, 12 46 games).  Kulich also was solidly 9/20 in the face off circle last night.  

If Kozak and Kulich continue to build on this game and others like it, the Sabres just may have their 3rd and 4th line centers for the near future.  

The best news about their ascension is it frees our limited capital to begin to fix the other holes in the lineup like defense and playmaking in the top 6. 

Why wouldn't the Sabres play Krebs as the 3rd or 4th line center? He's better than Kozak. 

Posted

Any time you have the ability to pencil in a Juri Kulich to a prominent role based on an extrapolation of some rookie-ish stats put up while there was no pressure on team and said player ala Jack Quinn, you have to do so 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

He is, but why pay him $4 mill when Kulich and Kozak combine for 1.6 mill?  

Thompson is the No. 1 C

The Sabres need to find a 2

Kulich 3

Kozak 4

with Krebs as a floater.  

You legit need to just walk away from the "we should not sign McLeod" schtick you got going. It is still illogical in the extreme. Why the flying F would I give a ***** about paying a legit NHL center 4mil a year just to save a couple million by replacing him with a guy who has 1 NHL goal total, and another who is a 20yr old rookie that if he gets in trouble, in your scenario, there is 0, zilch, nada in the wings to replace him. He's just fed to the wolves. I am sorry but you deserve to be called out every single time you start this bizarre crusade against McLeod. WTF man, you want to get rid of McLeod and his 10g and 24pts to date, a guy who is 6'3" and over 50% on faceoffs so we can hope and pray that 5'11" Tyson Kozak can pick of the slack? You've completely lost objectivity. 

Posted

I like Kulich and Kozak (and Krebs) and I am excited about their futures. So, I am not criticizing the original post or dismissing the notion that these players will potentially be important pieces going forward.  I just think this is similar to what we did with Cozens when he was 19-21 (and Quinn, Peterka, Benson, Power, Levi).  When a young player has a good game or does something well, we tend to project a near future where they continue to do that thing well and them building on it by improving in other areas. That next level of improvement doesn't always happen though, or it doesn't happen as quicky as hoped/needed, or the development isn't linear.  I'm not  advocating for the trade of any specific young player.  However, unless we are prepared to be content with awaiting the year where through patience alone the team's combined level of talent, age, and experience, reaches a critical mass that pushes us into the playoffs, then some of these young guys need to be traded.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...