Jump to content

GDT - 1/9/2025 Buffalo @ Ottawa 7pm - MSG/ESPN+/Who knows


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Carmel Corn said:

IDK - the Sens are certainly higher in the standings with games in hand.  I expected a much better showing from them, but I guess any team can screw the pooch on any given night.

That would make the Sabres chronic pooch-screwers.

Posted

I like that the Sabres are winning, but for people wondering why or why they can't do this all the time....

They are playing a team that has some young guys that aren't the best without the puck (just like the Sabres), and the don't have their #1 goalie behind them to bail them out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, bunomatic said:

The Sens play by play lady isn’t bad. A little too much yackety yack between her and the color guy while play goes on but she’s pretty good.

I love the ladies but when it comes to commentating I prefer it be males. Women have that higher pitch and it’s not pleasant when it elevates on exciting plays. My wife agrees. She can’t stand when women are on the play by play. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
  • dislike 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Consider this. If the Sabres did this: W-L-W-OTL-W-L-W every 7 games, that's .642 and with 41 games left, would get you to 87.

Not enough. Need at least 95. I heard need .666 win % before West coast trip… higher now.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I was out for my sister-in-law's 50th birthday dinner but was tracking the game on my phone. Got back in time to catch the last five minutes of the 2nd. Needless to say, it feels pretty good to see a four goal lead. If things start to go south in the 3rd, I will make an Irish exit before you good folks decide to come hunt me down and start the stoning (and not the good kind) process...

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Sabres73 said:

We'll need a substantial winning streak to get back in contention. Let's make it two in a row tonight

Naw. Just maintain .650 the rest of the way and you have a shot. It'll be an 8-team shmozzle for the 2 wild cards and maybe 3rd 

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Posted
Just now, PromoTheRobot said:

Naw. Just maintain .650 the rest of the way and you have a shot.

Right, but you're realistically not going to hit .650 without a substantial winning streak.

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Carmel Corn said:

As much as I like Benson, he still should be developing elsewhere.  Krebs comes to mind as maybe another.  

With respect, Benson is exactly where I want him.  He's developing nicely and I don't see anything hindering him being in the NHL.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Carmel Corn said:

Yes it’s good.  I’d like to throw in the old ABC MNF theme as another favorite.

If we're getting nostalgic, The Wide World of Sports theme was pretty awesome too! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Spoonman said:

Not enough. Need at least 95. I heard need .666 win % before West coast trip… higher now.

 

They'll have a devil of a time getting to that number...

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 7+6=13 said:

With respect, Benson is exactly where I want him.  He's developing nicely and I don't see anything hindering him being in the NHL.  

I (like you and many others) LOVE the kid and I want him to have a great career in Buffalo.  I just think he needs to get a bit stronger and faster in order to maximize his potential.  He already has great hockey smarts and attitude….just need his body to catch-up.  I also think about his mental state….sometimes he is the only one who has shown some backbone on the whole team.  I don’t want the rest of the team to poison Benson’s attitude.

Posted
6 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

I just spelled out how to go .642 by going 4-2-1 every 7.

Yes, I understand the math, and the theory, but as I said realistically it won't happen without a substantial win streak. It just won't.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Spoonman said:

Not enough. Need at least 95. I heard need .666 win % before West coast trip… higher now.

 

Maybe not this year.  95 is a good number but a lot of teams are clogged up fighting for points.  It could be less this year. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

Hockey should be 2 periods only, 3 periods is cruel and people drink to much beer 🍺 

Light weight alert! 🚨 

I moved on from 🍻 back at game 4 of losing streak! 
 

Billy Bob Thornton Drinking GIF by Sky

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, rickshaw said:

I love the ladies but when it comes to commentating I prefer it be males. Women have that higher pitch and it’s not pleasant when it elevates on exciting plays. My wife agrees. She can’t stand when women are on the play by play. 

I think the PBP sounds good, except for the fact she suffers the same problem as her male counterparts: talking too much BS instead of calling the game.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sabres73 said:

Yes, I understand the math, and the theory, but as I said realistically it won't happen without a substantial win streak. It just won't.

Okay, but just so it's known, the Sabres are 4-2-1 since ending the streak.

Posted
6 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

Hockey should be 2 periods only, 3 periods is cruel and people drink to much beer 🍺 

I vote for 4 periods and unlimited sudden death OT. 

  • Haha (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...