LGR4GM Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 14 minutes ago, Pimlach said: The bold is the way to build a Cup winner. You have to get in the upper echelon first. Looking for short cuts won't work because this team doesn't attract the right players. Once you get to the top tier good players will come here and you can fine tune from there. A top 8 team in Buffalo, one that is a contender every year, will bring fans back and attract new ones. Winning games needs to be the priority again. Not draft picks. I never understand this idea. You have to draft well, period. You have to do that to get into the top 8 even if you are trading those drafted players away for established players. We will never be Florida or Vegas where the destination draws ppl outright but yes winning draws ppl too. Buffalo acquired all these assets but never decided to turn those assets into something, they just sit on them... forever. Quote
Pimlach Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 11 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: I never understand this idea. You have to draft well, period. You have to do that to get into the top 8 even if you are trading those drafted players away for established players. We will never be Florida or Vegas where the destination draws ppl outright but yes winning draws ppl too. Buffalo acquired all these assets but never decided to turn those assets into something, they just sit on them... forever. Yes, I also meant trading NHL players for more picks, and then sitting on the picks. Which is our cycle right now. Quote
JP51 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 Well this tells me this guy would fit the Sabres motif to a tee https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/nhl/he-wants-win-bad-gets-hot-headed-when-elias-pettersson-gave-honest-description-canucks-teammate-j-t-miller-s-personality Quote
Crusader1969 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 (edited) On 12/21/2024 at 10:08 AM, freester said: I would offer Cozens and Samuelson and Rosen. Idk if that gets it done. I like it. Probably I like it too much which means it's probably not good enough for Vancouver here is a thought: Let's assume they know Zucker wants to go into free agency Trade him now, while his value is high - get a first rounder for him add that 1st round pick to to offer to Vancouver. That's 3 first round players and a 6'4 Dman Maybe that entices them? Edited January 14 by Crusader1969 1 Quote
JP51 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 12 hours ago, Crusader1969 said: I like it. Probably I like it too much which means it's probably not good enough for Vancouver here is a thought: Let's assume they know Zucker wants to go into free agency Trade him now, while his value is high - get a first rounder for him add that 1st round pick to to offer to Vancouver. That's 3 first round players and a 6'4 Dman Maybe that entices them? When EP says stuff like this in response to why is there an problem with you and JT Miller, it scares me that we are just getting another talented guy without the DNA to be a player that is part of the solution... maybe its just a sound bite... but I would prefer if he was the one who wanted to win so bad and they were calling him hot headed... jmo “He’s a skillful player (JT Miller) but he’s, I don’t know if emotional is the right word. He wants to win so bad sometimes he maybe gets too hot-headed, if that’s the right word. He cares a lot, and he just wants to win.” Quote
Archie Lee Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 1 hour ago, JP51 said: When EP says stuff like this in response to why is there an problem with you and JT Miller, it scares me that we are just getting another talented guy without the DNA to be a player that is part of the solution... maybe its just a sound bite... but I would prefer if he was the one who wanted to win so bad and they were calling him hot headed... jmo “He’s a skillful player (JT Miller) but he’s, I don’t know if emotional is the right word. He wants to win so bad sometimes he maybe gets too hot-headed, if that’s the right word. He cares a lot, and he just wants to win.” In fairness, Miller appears to be a next level wanker. And Pettersson is not speaking in his first language. It comes across as Pettersson not having a commitment to winning, but it could just be him trying to diplomatically say: Miller is a (insert preferred expletive). I have concerns about Pettersson. That he personally doesn’t like JT Miller, is not one of my concerns. 1 Quote
mjd1001 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 The more I think about it, the more I want Pettersson here if it can be done. Yeah the drop in production, whatever it is going on with Miller, and the contract are all issues to think about. But if those things weren't there, there is no chance he would be on the market. I always perceived him as a player I liked. I know its only one game, but I watched in vs the Leafs on Saturday and he played really hard, he hustled, he got in the way of shots, he made some really good defensive plays. He does not look at all like a perimeter player and he does hustle on plays. That alleviates most of my concerns. Quote
JP51 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 29 minutes ago, Archie Lee said: In fairness, Miller appears to be a next level wanker. And Pettersson is not speaking in his first language. It comes across as Pettersson not having a commitment to winning, but it could just be him trying to diplomatically say: Miller is a (insert preferred expletive). I have concerns about Pettersson. That he personally doesn’t like JT Miller, is not one of my concerns. Fair Quote
Crusader1969 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 On 1/14/2025 at 10:57 AM, Archie Lee said: In fairness, Miller appears to be a next level wanker. And Pettersson is not speaking in his first language. It comes across as Pettersson not having a commitment to winning, but it could just be him trying to diplomatically say: Miller is a (insert preferred expletive). I have concerns about Pettersson. That he personally doesn’t like JT Miller, is not one of my concerns. If both were 26 , I'd prefer Miller but with Miller at 31 (not to mention playing the type of game where his body could start breaking down) and EP at 26 EP is the target Side note - Insider Trading on TSN is now saying that Miller is much more likely to be traded then EP Quote
Porous Five Hole Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said: If both were 26 , I'd prefer Miller but with Miller at 31 (not to mention playing the type of game where his body could start breaking down) and EP at 26 EP is the target Side note - Insider Trading on TSN is now saying that Miller is much more likely to be traded then EP JT Miller lives in Pittsburgh during the offseason. MAYBE he would be willing to waive his NMC to play In Buffalo if the closer distance helps his (leave of absence) issue? I doubt it. But that could be the type of guy this locker room needs and to hell with the contract in year’s 5-7. Win mode now if I recall? Quote
DarthEbriate Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 It would take a lot less in cost to acquire Miller. On the other hand, that means 3 teams felt he was not worth keeping around despite good-to-great production. He also has that pesky NMC that Pettersson does not. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.