bob_sauve28 Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Another year, another very high draft pick for the Farm Team known as the Buffalo Sabres. Tage Thompson is a great hockey player who's career is going to die here in Buffalo if he does not get a top player to play with. We need someone that can make the PP work and this is a big bargaining chip. Hang out a for sale sign and see if there are any takers, but I'm sure we will wait till season is over to make any deal, but I do not want another long term project on the team where we have to wait seven years for him to grow to a man. We have enough "prospects" already. 2 Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 1 hour ago, bob_sauve28 said: Another year, another very high draft pick for the Farm Team known as the Buffalo Sabres. Tage Thompson is a great hockey player who's career is going to die here in Buffalo if he does not get a top player to play with. We need someone that can make the PP work and this is a big bargaining chip. Hang out a for sale sign and see if there are any takers, but I'm sure we will wait till season is over to make any deal, but I do not want another long term project on the team where we have to wait seven years for him to grow to a man. We have enough "prospects" already. As always, depends on the return. Quote
SDS Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 5 minutes ago, Thorner said: I’m flabbergasted by the logic of not … finishing your thought on a message board. Quote
Thorner Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 5 minutes ago, SDS said: … finishing your thought on a message board. 11 minutes ago, Thorner said: I’m flabbergasted by the logic of not (trading the pick) Quote
Dreams Burn Down Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 I am reactionarily tempted to think, "**** it, trade the pick no matter what." However, this season could get so much worse. We may end up with the top pick. If it's a great fit for our future (a reliable, workhorse stay at home D for example) I'd keep the pick. Quote
Thorner Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Imagine using another first overall pick on a D-man. Would be insanely bad asset management. If the top pick in a draft is a “stay at home” D-man, that’s by definition a weak draft. Trade the pick. We should be trading it unless teams’ offers are out of left field Quote
Flashsabre Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Do whatever you want it won’t make a difference. Either draft a young, highly talented kid who will get devoured by this culture of losing or trade it for a few underwhelming assets that won’t fit into this culture of losing. 1 Quote
Mustache of God Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 I've been advocating for trading our 1st round pick since we drafted Östlund, Kulich and....Rosen(?) in that one draft. We've had a problem of having too many "skill" guys and nowhere on the roster to accommodate bringing up all this young talent. Instead GMKA has sat back on his hands doing the bare minimum as a GM and here we are. 1 Quote
WhenWillItEnd66 Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Might as well trade it. They will only pick a passive maybe goal scorer that is afraid of the front of the net and cannot play defense. Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 15 minutes ago, WhenWillItEnd66 said: Might as well trade it. They will only pick a passive maybe goal scorer that is afraid of the front of the net and cannot play defense. Looks at Zach Benson and Konsta Helenius... Then looks at Misa and Martone... 18 minutes ago, Mustache of God said: I've been advocating for trading our 1st round pick since we drafted Östlund, Kulich and....Rosen(?) in that one draft. We've had a problem of having too many "skill" guys and nowhere on the roster to accommodate bringing up all this young talent. Instead GMKA has sat back on his hands doing the bare minimum as a GM and here we are. Savoie, Östlund, and Kulich. FTR, I have no problem trading a first round pick, what are we getting in return? Quote
thewookie1 Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 I'll trade a protected 1st but easy no to any unprotected asks. 1 Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Like all questions, the answer is it depends. Depends on where we are drafting and what is offered in return. Is there a franchise center in this draft? Will that player be available when we draft? Are prospects and or draft picks offered in return or are there NHL players coming back the other way, such as a top 6 playmaker or top 4 defenseman. The other question is who is making the trade. If it’s still Adams, how can you trust him to make the right decision? The Sabres need to fix this mess, but trading a top 5 draft pick may not be the smartest first step. Quote
bob_sauve28 Posted December 16 Author Report Posted December 16 1 hour ago, LGR4GM said: As always, depends on the return. Of course, but Adams, or whoever, should be saying out loud, we want to make a trade. No more, "Well, we are always listening to offers" No doubt the pick will win the cup with the team he goes to. Quote
Archie Lee Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 We have lots of tradable assets. I don’t want us to trade our 1st rd pick more than I want us to trade any number of assets that could be moved to make us a better team. Also, I don’t need to win a trade. We have so many young assets that it should be understood that it’s ok to move a piece that will hurt a bit. Presumably, the more it hurts the better the return should be. 2 Quote
SabreFinn Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 I would not trade a top 5 pick. There has to be other ways to make a winning team. Quote
LabattBlue Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 3 hours ago, bob_sauve28 said: Another year, another very high draft pick for the Farm Team known as the Buffalo Sabres. Tage Thompson is a great hockey player who's career is going to die here in Buffalo if he does not get a top player to play with. We need someone that can make the PP work and this is a big bargaining chip. Hang out a for sale sign and see if there are any takers, but I'm sure we will wait till season is over to make any deal, but I do not want another long term project on the team where we have to wait seven years for him to grow to a man. We have enough "prospects" already. There is not a single pick, prospect or current Sabre that should not be on the table. 2 1 Quote
Demoted Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Will it actually matter one way or the other? Quote
Jorcus Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 Here is a list of people you probably can not get with that pick. or pick and package. We are so screwed the only way to get out of it is keep drafting until there is so much talent on the ice a hamster could coach them. https://www.prohockeyrumors.com/2024/07/players-with-no-move-no-trade-clauses-in-2024-25.html Quote
Ogelthorpe Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 No, draft the right guy for once! Then trade all your misses, ie; Cozens, Quinn, Rosen, Power, Joki, for experienced players who play the right way and actually look like they are trying. Quote
Thorner Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 (edited) 37 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: There is not a single pick, prospect or current Sabre that should not be on the table. Agree. And I’d be converting any good future asset to a good present asset whenever possible. Presumably the 1st round pick has higher value than most if not all of our other future assets, if we get the same relative value in return as we’d be getting in a trade for any other young asset, of course I’m taking it. If it’s a good trade (the kind you make) we likely get the highest level of current asset with it that we can look to see from moves we may make. ie im not trading it just to trade it but it would be at the top of my list, all else equal. (Ie we are getting the same relative level of trade return across the board) Edited December 16 by Thorner Quote
EM88 Posted December 16 Report Posted December 16 It is not as easy as a yes or no question. The first round pick is just one of many young assets this team has. So is the first pick the following year. Kulich. Rosen. Levi. Helenius. Östlund. If I am going to trade my first overall pick and not protect it, the return better be very good. If you are putting some kind of lottery protection on that pick or you are talking one of the other prospects, than sure, make that trade. If you get someone that is going to help this team right now, then they should trade a future asset for it. Quote
Weave Posted Monday at 08:25 PM Report Posted Monday at 08:25 PM Without question we should keep the 1st round pick. That pick is the only way we can continue to justify pushing out the timeline another year. Quote
Carmel Corn Posted Monday at 08:28 PM Report Posted Monday at 08:28 PM (edited) If GMKA is still doing the drafting, then I say yes….trade it. Adam’s will draft another small and soft lefty defenseman. 😬 Edited Monday at 08:29 PM by Carmel Corn Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.