klos1963 Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 17 hours ago, Flashsabre said: Cozens, Quinn, Kulich, Levi would you do that dare certain people clamouring for Brady but to get Ottawa to trade their captain in division it would hurt. And I don’t know if those pieces would entice them. Sabres would do that in a heartbeat. Doubt Ottawa would even return the phone call. Basically, Ottawa would get zero help today. 1 Quote
Carmel Corn Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 (edited) Power (or some kind of sign and trade with Byram + ?) Edited November 23 by Carmel Corn Quote
Sabres73 Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 38 minutes ago, klos1963 said: Sabres would do that in a heartbeat. Doubt Ottawa would even return the phone call. Basically, Ottawa would get zero help today. Lol, the Sabres most certainly would not be doing that “in a heartbeat” or ever. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 I’d love to have Brady, but it would have to be a 3 way trade like Ana acquires Thachuk and then trades him to us. I give this a .01% chance of this happening. Quote
Taro T Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 30 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I’d love to have Brady, but it would have to be a 3 way trade like Ana acquires Thachuk and then trades him to us. I give this a .01% chance of this happening. Pretty sure you're being optimistic there. 😉 1 1 Quote
JohnC Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 1 hour ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I’d love to have Brady, but it would have to be a 3 way trade like Ana acquires Thachuk and then trades him to us. I give this a .01% chance of this happening. More like .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. And that may be an overestimation. The organization is at a point where it is starting to fill out its roster and building some depth. Thinning out the roster for one appealing player makes little sense to me. (Not saying you are arguing for that but some here are making that argument.) When there are opportunities to make a trade to improve the roster, it should be done. But in general, the GM has staked out a course and should follow through with it. 1 Quote
klos1963 Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 1 hour ago, Sabres73 said: Lol, the Sabres most certainly would not be doing that “in a heartbeat” or ever. We're just giving up roster spots. They'd kill to get rid of Cozens contract. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 Quinn (he's an Ottawa kid isn't he?) , Byram and 2 first round picks. Is that enough? If we made that deal soon I guarantee we'd be in the playoffs. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 2 hours ago, JohnC said: More like .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. And that may be an overestimation. The organization is at a point where it is starting to fill out its roster and building some depth. Thinning out the roster for one appealing player makes little sense to me. (Not saying you are arguing for that but some here are making that argument.) When there are opportunities to make a trade to improve the roster, it should be done. But in general, the GM has staked out a course and should follow through with it. No. Absolutely no. When you are close to getting there it's on the GM to make bold moves to take the extra step. 2 1 1 Quote
freester Posted November 23 Author Report Posted November 23 14 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Quinn (he's an Ottawa kid isn't he?) , Byram and 2 first round picks. Is that enough? If we made that deal soon I guarantee we'd be in the playoffs. I wouldn’t add Byram. Hes been playing well. I would offer a 1st and Samuelson in addition to the initial offer 1 Quote
Thorner Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 How much would you trade for a wood-chuck Tkachuk if a Tkachuk would chuck-wood here? 2 1 Quote
Stoner Posted November 23 Report Posted November 23 11 minutes ago, Thorner said: How much would you trade for a wood-chuck Tkachuk if a Tkachuk would chuck-wood here? Here a chuk there a chuk everywhere a chuk chuk. And it never happened. It. Never. Happened. Quote
Taro T Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 50 minutes ago, Stoner said: Here a chuk there a chuk everywhere a chuk chuk. And it never happened. It. Never. Happened. Never? '90-'92 were just a dream? Andreychuk Malarchuk Hawerchuk Here a 'chuk, there a 'chuk, ev'rywhere a 'chuk 'chuk. 2 Quote
Stoner Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 3 hours ago, Taro T said: Never? '90-'92 were just a dream? Andreychuk Malarchuk Hawerchuk Here a 'chuk, there a 'chuk, ev'rywhere a 'chuk 'chuk. I was quoting Rick. His dream was to call the three of them touching the puck in succession. 1 1 Quote
JohnC Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 5 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Quinn (he's an Ottawa kid isn't he?) , Byram and 2 first round picks. Is that enough? If we made that deal soon I guarantee we'd be in the playoffs. Absolutely not. 1 Quote
Weave Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 26 minutes ago, Stoner said: I was quoting Rick. His dream was to call the three of them touching the puck in succession. I have a vague recollection of this. Quote
Stoner Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 23 minutes ago, Weave said: I have a vague recollection of this. A stock story he told over the years. Probably on the Top Shelf video they did years ago. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 9 hours ago, freester said: I wouldn’t add Byram. Hes been playing well. I would offer a 1st and Samuelson in addition to the initial offer Don't think that would get it done. I don't think we could get rid of any of the pieces we don't like (for various reasons). Byram has the contract issue coming up and you are left with the question of how much you spend on your D when you already have Power and Dahlin making big bucks. In any event I think it would take a 4 firsts or equivalents type offer not unlike Eichel. Is he actually worth that? No, but also yes. Not in terms of mathematical value, but in terms of being a missing ingredient that takes us over the top, absolutely. Quote
Pimlach Posted November 24 Report Posted November 24 On 11/23/2024 at 11:19 AM, LTS said: I don't Tkachuk anywhere near the Sabres. Until he grows up he's a liability on the ice. Not only that, but what the Sabres give up creates more holes in the lineup than Tkachuk fills. The Sabres get Tkachuk and people are going be mad every time he takes a stupid penalty. Buffalo is one of the last places he would pick to play in. He wants to play in St Louis (hometown), or be with his big brother somewhere. St Louis would have to gut their team to get him. Florida cannot fit him in either. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.