Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

4 and 23 out there again.  Ruff is sitting Clifton because of why?  

Because Samuelsson has an A and they like him

9 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

 

Gotta complain about Tuch more often. He's been way better this game.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Carmel Corn said:

I’d be playing Reimer….oh wait, he’s not on the team anymore (GMKA brilliance)

Please don’t misunderstand. I’m not trying to shill for the team…but to blame the GM for signing a a guy who is good enough to get claimed on waivers isn’t bad GM’ing. What would you want instead? Someone worse?

BTW, Reimer is an .864 in his two starts for the Ducks. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Pimlach said:

To me it looks like when he is not surrounded by Red Wings, he is playing great position. I see the Wings have a lot of shots going wide, the net covered, which doesn’t count at a shot attempt either. 
 

If the Sabres allow opponents to have that much puck possession in the high danger areas, then the goalie will not have good numbers, goals will happen.  

Yeah... Tell me how the first goal was a "high danger" shot? Poor angle shot from Larkin and went off his pads and in... The guy is average and sometimes plays much below. Costly goal.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

Because Samuelsson has an A and they like him

Gotta complain about Tuch more often. He's been way better this game.

Agree.

I’m sure Ruff gave him an earful after last night.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Porous Five Hole said:

Please don’t misunderstand. I’m not trying to shill for the team…but to blame the GM for signing a a guy who is good enough to get claimed on waivers isn’t bad GM’ing. What would you want instead? Someone worse?

BTW, Reimer is an .864 in his two starts for the Ducks. 

No worries….my point is that our goalie’s aren’t playing well enough to steal any games for us.  Both are below .900 as well.  As far as tonight is concerned, I thought UPL should have been able to stop the first Detroit goal.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Marty said:

Just had a scary thought…

If we rally and win tonight, I’ll be expected to post next game….

Just declare yourself a 'healthy scratch'. Problem solved.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Why are our forwards with skill so freaking slow

3 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

But if we just hit more we'll be better... right? Right!?!?

 

It is not just hitting... but hitting when it counts... our defense stick checks

Posted
3 minutes ago, Scottysabres said:

I got no complaints with this game win or lose. The efforts there.

Not to excuse them but back-to-back and on the road doesn't help either.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Marty said:

Just had a scary thought…

If we rally and win tonight, I’ll be expected to post next game….

That’s an honor. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, WhenWillItEnd66 said:

Why are our forwards with skill so freaking slow

It is not just hitting... but hitting when it counts... our defense stick checks

Ik, I'm just being salty

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Talbot had his pads on the ice and Tuch just slid it straight into the pads. Get some loft.

Edited by ExWNYer

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...