Stoner Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago He's hot tho. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Archie Lee said: I’m not at all hung 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohicksie Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Jorcus said: You have to look at who he is replacing. That would be Ryan Johnson or Jacob Bryson. I am going to think at the end of the day that is an upgrade. Highly mobile defensemen are coveted in todays NHL and there is no mercy on the teams that don't have them. It's 10 games with a new coach and a new system with a skilled developing defenseman. The Ruff system is get the puck out of the D zone as fast as you can vs the Granato system which was to box in gain control and work your way out. I am not sure why he is paired with Power but that may change. I would like to see the three puck movers spread out. I'm not convinced Byram is much of an upgrade over Johnson (not enough data on Johnson). I think Johnson is the odd man out because he's waiver exempt and, as a graduating college student, just doesn't have pro experience. But if we needed him on the big club I think he'd be okay. But maybe not... like I said, not enough data. 1 hour ago, SwampD said: I’m guessing age. I know we don’t want to hear this old trope, but the Sabres are still a young team. Age on who's part? Mitts (25)? Byram (23)? Relative to what? Tying it back, Johnson is the same age as Byram. Edited 1 hour ago by Doohicksie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted 36 minutes ago Report Share Posted 36 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Stoner said: He's hot tho. 58 minutes ago, Doohicksie said: I'm not convinced Byram is much of an upgrade over Johnson (not enough data on Johnson). I think Johnson is the odd man out because he's waiver exempt and, as a graduating college student, just doesn't have pro experience. But if we needed him on the big club I think he'd be okay. But maybe not... like I said, not enough data. Agreed he isn't our worst player. He has been fine via the eye test. But Ryan Johnson was also fine by the eye test. The issue that this team has with Byrum is that it just doesn't make sense. If he blossoms into what we were sold he could be, it doesn't make sense to extend him with Power/Dahlin already here. So what is the plan? From a roster construction POV it was just weird. We still need help on the defense and we now need more help filling out the top 6. This team would be better if we had Mitts/Ryan Johnson than it is is Cozens/Byram. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.