Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, SABRES 0311 said:

It took being on a team with one of the top three greatest players to ever play in the NHL. 

No, it didn’t. That just happened to be the team he went to after being here - that’s the point. It was never a “curse” 

Edited by Thorner
Posted
19 minutes ago, Thorner said:

No, it didn’t. That just happened to be the team he went to after being here - that’s the point. It was never a “curse” 

Like most players in the NHL, Skinner never single-handedly tanked a team’s chances of making the playoffs. Dylan Cozens is another such player. That doesn’t mean they are necessarily players you want on your team, but they aren’t playoff boogie men. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, LGR4GM said:

Players we could've drafted 

 

I’m trying to remember the timeline. Did they trade back with San Jose much earlier in the day?

Edited by shrader
Posted
2 hours ago, shrader said:

I’m trying to remember the timeline. Did they trade back with San Jose much earlier in the day?

Previous day. It was not a draft floor trade. They made it before any players were taken.

They made it seem like they were pretty confident they were going to get the guy (or one of the guys) they wanted regardless.

Which I always thought was odd because the Luchenko pick was off the board.

Also wondered if part of the motivation was that they weren't going to be taking Parekh or an LD due to need?

Posted
3 hours ago, Thorner said:

No, it didn’t. That just happened to be the team he went to after being here - that’s the point. It was never a “curse” 

Skinner never played a playoff game until he got to a team with McDavid. 

Posted
1 hour ago, dudacek said:

Previous day. It was not a draft floor trade. They made it before any players were taken.

They made it seem like they were pretty confident they were going to get the guy (or one of the guys) they wanted regardless.

Which I always thought was odd because the Luchenko pick was off the board.

Also wondered if part of the motivation was that they weren't going to be taking Parekh or an LD due to need?

Yeah, I remember being confused as to why either team would do it at that point, not having any clue how the board would shake out. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Ducky said:

I see LA and the Avs winning.

Edmonton is a little banged up and just lost Ekholm so it might be LA's turn to win that. Not sure about Avs. Haven't seen them since their deadline deals. Great Raantanen storyline though. Goaltending could shift that one. 7 game toss up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

Edmonton is a little banged up and just lost Ekholm so it might be LA's turn to win that. Not sure about Avs. Haven't seen them since their deadline deals. Great Raantanen storyline though. Goaltending could shift that one. 7 game toss up. 

The Stars are not playing well and their D is suspect.

LA have been playing playoff hockey for awhile now.

Edited by Ducky
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, SABRES 0311 said:

Skinner never played a playoff game until he got to a team with McDavid. 

You're assuming that when Draisaitl, Frederic, RNH, and Hyman (and maybe, possibly, even Kane?) return to the lineup, that Skinner remains dressed. They're all day-to-day except Kane, who was practicing with the team in March.

Edited by DarthEbriate
Posted
49 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

You're assuming that when Draisaitl, Frederic, RNH, and Hyman (and maybe, possibly, even Kane?) return to the lineup, that Skinner remains dressed. They're all day-to-day except Kane, who was practicing with the team in March.

Good point. Skinner has a history of being a one way player and the playoffs require a full team effort on both sides of the red line.

Posted
14 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

Edmonton is a little banged up and just lost Ekholm so it might be LA's turn to win that. Not sure about Avs. Haven't seen them since their deadline deals. Great Raantanen storyline though. Goaltending could shift that one. 7 game toss up. 

The Avs.have a good chance to run the table. They got a lot healthier and deeper as the season went on. Dallas does not have the defense to hold them off.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

Well, look at that!

Colorado completes game #82 and Landeskog is good to go after multiple years on LTIR, just in time for game 1 of round 1. Funny how that timing magically works out.

But thats ok as the Avs are my second favorite team!! LOL

Posted
1 hour ago, DarthEbriate said:

Well, look at that!

Colorado completes game #82 and Landeskog is good to go after multiple years on LTIR, just in time for game 1 of round 1. Funny how that timing magically works out.

They held him out for three years just for this very day. Those evils bastards!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, shrader said:

They held him out for three years just for this very day. Those evils bastards!

And it stinks he's been through so many surgeries; the league is better with him in it.

But he's been practicing and traveling with the team for 4 weeks, which means he's been capable of hockey-related activities for months. It's just such transparent circumventing of the cap. And the fix is so easy: either a) once designated LTIR, they cannot play until July 1st/start of next season or b) you cannot ice a playoff lineup that is not cap-compliant.

If the Sabres were good, they could sit Power to bulk up all next regular season, and Norris too. Then just unleash them and their $16M in salary at playoff time (after a conditioning stint, naturally).

Posted
On 4/14/2025 at 6:59 PM, PromoTheRobot said:

MTL loses in a SO to Chicago. So the Habs need one point to clinch, otherwise the Bluejackets have to win 2 in regulation to get WC2.

Down to the last game. I will laugh if the Habs miss because of that Chicago game. Chances are they see an AHL roster last game though. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...