Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’ll be curious to hear any info on the throw in guy. This isn’t a case where teams need to even out the number of contracts… unless Edmonton and other moves have put them close to the limit. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
  On 7/5/2024 at 8:50 PM, #freejame said:

The first article I read said McLeod was a UFA. I’ve seen multiple posts now say RFA. Can anyone confirm what it is?

Expand  

He's heading into his 5th year and will be an RFA next summer.

Edited by dudacek
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Posted

Can McLeod realistically challenge Cozens for 2C? That seems like a low opinion of Cozens or a high opinion of McLeod. 

  On 7/5/2024 at 8:52 PM, DarthEbriate said:

Playing center behind McDavid and Draisaitl (whenever they aren't on the ice together) and now Henrique.

Savoie could become a legitimate top-6 forward, but the Sabres kept the better Winnipeg ICE prospect within the organization, and now have a legit 2/3C to push Cozens and take D-zone faceoffs for Ruff.

This is a good hockey trade from both sides.

Expand  

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/5/2024 at 8:43 PM, dudacek said:

 

There's that thing about knowing your players better than anyone else.

There's also that thing about having too many of the same types of players.

And that thing about the necessity of getting better now.

I liked Savoie, but I think he was more likely to become a Tyler Ennis than a star. Not sure if McLeod can be more than what he is right now.

That's consecutive trades made where Adams "lost value" to "fix his roster"

It's what a lot of people wanted.

As usual, time will tell.

Expand  

“Watching Zach (Benson), most nights he was as good if not better then Matty (Savoie)” -Lukas Suter, Sabres Western Scout  from the 2023 NHL Draft Embedded Video. 
 

Savoie Value to the team started to decreased the second Benson was drafted

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted

There was never going to be enough room for Savoie, Kulich and Östlund. It's always been obvious that some of them would be moved. I don't know anything about this guy but reading that's he's laser fast and can actually play defense makes me like the trade .

  • Like (+1) 6
Posted
  On 7/5/2024 at 8:30 PM, Archie Lee said:

Very happy with this trade. Likely slots Krebs to line 4 and now we have 13 NHL forwards. Not earth shattering, but a solid move. 

Expand  

Agree. We lose some upside definitely, and the coming year is still hard to predict as this isn’t exactly a splash, but it’s very solid. It was huge to replace Krebs as 3C

  On 7/5/2024 at 8:32 PM, thewookie1 said:

According to the Oilers, he's a very soft player.

 

I hate overpaying regardless though; we're being torn a new one on the HFboards

Expand  

This is a good trade! 

HF: hockey FUTURE

its the present, of course they hate the deal 

  On 7/5/2024 at 8:30 PM, Archie Lee said:

Very happy with this trade. Likely slots Krebs to line 4 and now we have 13 NHL forwards. Not earth shattering, but a solid move. 

Expand  

Actually it may slot Krebs off the team 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/5/2024 at 8:36 PM, Peter said:

This board is schizophrenic.

So many people were clamoring for a trade even if we had to overpay.

Now people are complaining that we overpaid.

I suppose the reactions here were to be expected.

 

Expand  

Quote the posters you are calling out 

Posted
  On 7/5/2024 at 9:00 PM, Shoot da Puck said:

This will sell alot of tickets

Huge move 

 

 

Expand  

I’m pretty sure this is sarcasm, but it is a huge pressure release trade.  We all knew (as did the rest of the NHL) that we couldn’t enter next season with Krebs pencilled in the 3C.  This move gives us a legit 2-way 3C who kills penalties, wins draws and who is young enough and cheap enough to be a piece for the next few years.  It also removed a forward from our logjam of forward prospects.  I might agree that this move is “boring”, but the 2024/25 Sabres are better now than they were this morning. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 6
Posted

The prospect I would have been most happy to jettison is Rosen, but if McLeod is an ideal solution at 3C, is Sabres property for at least 2 seasons, and can slide up to 2C when needed, then….

 

Savoie we hardly knew thee.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 7/5/2024 at 8:54 PM, #freejame said:

Can McLeod realistically challenge Cozens for 2C? That seems like a low opinion of Cozens or a high opinion of McLeod.

Expand  

Last year, Cozens had a slow start, then his concussion. It took him a long time to look himself, but HCDG always kept him in the top 6. McLeod will likely only ever be a 3C on this roster as well, but he has the 200' game to push on Cozens if injuries/slumps take place. Ruff will mix-match lines and ice time and this is a good piece for that.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
  On 7/5/2024 at 8:58 PM, Brawndo said:

“Watching Zach (Benson), most nights he was as good if not better then Matty (Savoie)” -Lukas Suter, Sabres Western Scout  from the 2023 NHL Draft Embedded Video. 
 

Savoie Value to the team started to decreased the second Benson was drafted

Expand  

💯 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...