kas23 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 2 hours ago, Second Line Center said: McCleod only played 9 minutes in game 7 and was a minus 2. Let’s be serious here. Your team is down by 1 in the 2nd period of game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals. Series is tied 3-3. Are you going to put in the best player on the planet or his not insignificant side kick, or are you going to put in McLeod. These numbers are meaningless. 2 1 1 Quote
dudacek Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 37 minutes ago, Huckleberry said: I think the issue for some is, Savoie was ranked as our number 1 prospect, but this trade is a bit of a shock if it was so. It think it should serve as notice that while the Sabres have a lot of good prospects, they may not have any great ones. The great prospects - Power, Quinn, Peterka, Benson, Levi - are already on the team. 1 3 1 Quote
Brawndo Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 1 minute ago, TRIP65 said: Krebs would definitely need to be removed from Roster. The only other way is trade a player off Top 6 for another. Move Krebs and Greenway get a Top 6 guy. How do you get Benson in otherwise. Zucker is definitely playing as is Lafferty and Malenstyn. These are your grit guys and Zucker can backup anyone on the Top 6 for a short period. Roster is Full. May only be room for a Amerk on Bottom Line like Kulich over Aube-Kubel playing every game. Aube-Kubel is the one of the best if not the best defensive forward on the team. You want him playing every game 4 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 This team is a top 6 winger away from MAYBE being a competitive club if Ruff helps certain players take a step At first I felt whatever toward this trade, but after researching it more and putting my ignorance aside this is a solid deal props to Adams for doing it. McLeod is an elite skater and very good PKer The bottom 2 lines got a lot faster this off-season and better defensively 1 Quote
kas23 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 2 hours ago, Thorny said: Didn’t his brother get into some trouble? Are you saying maybe we should cancel this party and dust off the pitchforks? Quote
PerreaultForever Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 I was looking at an Oilers site and while here people are happy, there they are mostly saying how sorry they feel for Buffalo fans and how their temporary GM is killing it. I don't know why as I don't know McLeod all that well but go figure. Quote
OverPowerYou Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 So now we will have 2 former Sabres winning the cup next year 🤣 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 Just now, PerreaultForever said: I was looking at an Oilers site and while here people are happy, there they are mostly saying how sorry they feel for Buffalo fans and how their temporary GM is killing it. I don't know why as I don't know McLeod all that well but go figure. They are under the assumption that Savoie will become a good top 6 forward....which is extremely unknown at this point. I saw Oiler fans elsewhere saying we will love McLeod for his skating, work ethic and PK 2 1 Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 @thorny Yes, his brother along with Carter Hart and 3 others are part of the Canadian Jr sexual assault scandal. His brother used to play for Lindy in NJ. I raised Michael's name on another thread having forgotten that he was part of the scandal and has now been charged with sexual assault. Quote
Pimlach Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 9 minutes ago, TRIP65 said: Krebs would definitely need to be removed from Roster. The only other way is trade a player off Top 6 for another. Move Krebs and Greenway get a Top 6 guy. How do you get Benson in otherwise. Zucker is definitely playing as is Lafferty and Malenstyn. These are your grit guys and Zucker can backup anyone on the Top 6 for a short period. Roster is Full. May only be room for a Amerk on Bottom Line like Kulich over Aube-Kubel playing every game. I know 100% Appert don't feel that way Krebs does not definitively need to be removed. Teams carry 13 or 14 forwards. Now if he is package in trade fine, but it’s not a must to remove him. Having some depth is ok too, injuries happen a lot. He doesn’t cost anything and he is developing. The competition might make him better. Why move Greenway? He is an excellent defensive forward, is big and strong, good on the PK. 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 Just now, Pimlach said: Krebs does not definitively need to be removed. Teams carry 13 or 14 forwards. Now if he is package in trade fine, but it’s not a must to remove him. Having some depth is ok too, injuries happen a lot. He doesn’t cost anything and he is developing. The competition might make him better. Why move Greenway? He is an excellent defensive forward, is big and strong, good on the PK. I don't understand the dislike for Greenway. He has shown he can be a force. Do not want to move him 4 Quote
TRIP65 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 45 minutes ago, triumph_communes said: Joki is making the same as Ceci so I don’t see anything there Ryan Johnson for Ceci, we need a true RH Defensman We have other Defense Prospects for next year and after if needed. Dahlin Power Bo Bynam Cody Ceci Samuelsson Joki Bryson Clifton Quote
thewookie1 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 Just now, Pimlach said: Krebs does not definitively need to be removed. Teams carry 13 or 14 forwards. Now if he is package in trade fine, but it’s not a must to remove him. Having some depth is ok too, injuries happen a lot. He doesn’t cost anything and he is developing. The competition might make him better. Why move Greenway? He is an excellent defensive forward, is big and strong, good on the PK. I'd move Krebs and Greenway if it somehow was important to getting a Top 6 guy but otherwise Greenway is slow but still solid. Just now, TRIP65 said: Ryan Johnson for Ceci, we need a true RH Defensman We have other Defense Prospects for next year and after if needed. Dahlin Power Bo Bynam Cody Ceci Samuelsson Joki Bryson Clifton Ceci is terrible and I would offer a 7th for him 1 Quote
TRIP65 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 1 minute ago, Pimlach said: Krebs does not definitively need to be removed. Teams carry 13 or 14 forwards. Now if he is package in trade fine, but it’s not a must to remove him. Having some depth is ok too, injuries happen a lot. He doesn’t cost anything and he is developing. The competition might make him better. Why move Greenway? He is an excellent defensive forward, is big and strong, good on the PK. If you don't move either, where do you put your new Trade? Quote
TRIP65 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 Just now, thewookie1 said: I'd move Krebs and Greenway if it somehow was important to getting a Top 6 guy but otherwise Greenway is slow but still solid. Ceci is terrible and I would offer a 7th for him Edmonton went to the Cup and they quite like him. Need to move 3.5 million. I have read a bit about him and he wasn't good with only one of the pairings. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/3331580/2022/05/24/edmonton-oilers-cody-ceci-nhl-playoffs/ Quote
mjd1001 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 4 hours ago, Peter said: This board is schizophrenic. So many people were clamoring for a trade even if we had to overpay. Now people are complaining that we overpaid. I suppose the reactions here were to be expected. Not really. One group was clamoring for a trade and they made their voices heard in the past. Another group was quiet then, they were happy because there was no over pay. Now the group that wanted the trade is quiet (they got what they want) but the group that doesn't like overpaying is sounding off. Schizophrenice not really....just different people speaking up when they do/don't get what 'their side' wants. Quote
thewookie1 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 3 minutes ago, TRIP65 said: Edmonton went to the Cup and they quite like him. Need to move 3.5 million. I have read a bit about him and he wasn't good with only one of the pairings. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/3331580/2022/05/24/edmonton-oilers-cody-ceci-nhl-playoffs/ He's the team whipping boy for Oilers fans and was the same in Toronto and Ottawa as well. Jokiharju is honestly better Quote
Pimlach Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 2 minutes ago, TRIP65 said: If you don't move either, where do you put your new Trade? Depends on who you trade for doesn’t it? Right now there is no new trade. If Krebs is the person you want to trade you’re not getting much. We don’t need a draft pick. 1 1 Quote
TRIP65 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 4 minutes ago, thewookie1 said: I'd move Krebs and Greenway if it somehow was important to getting a Top 6 guy but otherwise Greenway is slow but still solid. Ceci is terrible and I would offer a 7th for him I don't want Greenway moved but right not Krebs isn't a guy playing, just backup. Greenway is a guy that could allow for a Top 6 pickup and Benson stays. Adams is NOT keeping his pickups this year with Ruffs approval off Roster except maybe Aube-Kubel situationally. Right now either Benson or Zucker are on second line. Greenway 3rd. so lets say Zucker is on third line. Greenway McLeod Benson Bottom 3 are set. Where does the new guy go? Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 Krebs vs McLeod. Player 1 - 219 gms 32g 43a 75pts Player 2 - 215 gms 20g 46a 66pts 1 1 Quote
Broken Ankles Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 Sabres opening Day line up 2023 Skinner-Thompson-Tuch Peterka-Cozens-Olofsson Greenway-Mittelstadt-Benson Girgensons-Krebs-Okposo Dahlin-Samuelsson Power-Jokiharju Clifton-E. Johnson Could be as many as 6 new faces in the forward ranks. Maybe two on D. That’s meaningful turnover. Skinner and Mitts look better than their replacements, on paper. Maybe another move with Joki or another Defenseman. 1 Quote
TRIP65 Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 2 minutes ago, Pimlach said: Depends on who you trade for doesn’t it? Right now there is no new trade. If Krebs is the person you want to trade you’re not getting much. We don’t need a draft pick. Your not getting it. I know Krebs isn't getting you anything but a spot to move another play off gametime Roster. Our Roster is full, we have extra Defenseman right now and maybe a 3rd Goalie again., LOL! 2nd line right now has Zucker or Benson. Other goes to 3rd line with Greenway McLeod 4th line is set with Malenstyn Lafferty Aube-Kubel/Krebs None of the Top 9 are going to 4th line unless you want Greenway there and that is Krebs gone then. That puts Benson on 3rd line. Someone has to go. No way a Amerk doesn't make team either. Must to keep things moving. Running out of Roster unless an Injury bug happens Quote
Doohicksie Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 4 hours ago, Brawndo said: Zucker-McLeod-Greenway 4 hours ago, thewookie1 said: he's a very soft player. On that line, does he really need to be the tough guy? Quote
Thorner Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 30 minutes ago, kas23 said: Are you saying maybe we should cancel this party and dust off the pitchforks? You read my posts in the thread and tell me Quote
Doohicksie Posted July 6 Report Posted July 6 4 hours ago, pastajoe said: Don’t like giving up on Savoie before we even got to see him play in the pros. Would have rather given up Krebs and a prospect like Ostland. I'd rather keep Ostland. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.