Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Was listening to a draft evaluator (Shane) on NHL XM last week and he claimed there was a definite top 8, a next group of 4 and then it weakens.  He said it’s an historically weak draft after the top few and compared it to 1999 which had the fewest draftees who played 200 games in X amount of years of tracking. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr Peabody said:

Was listening to a draft evaluator (Shane) on NHL XM last week and he claimed there was a definite top 8, a next group of 4 and then it weakens.  He said it’s an historically weak draft after the top few and compared it to 1999 which had the fewest draftees who played 200 games in X amount of years of tracking. 

Sounds like our 1st rounder could be better used to trade for a need then.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr Peabody said:

Was listening to a draft evaluator (Shane) on NHL XM last week and he claimed there was a definite top 8, a next group of 4 and then it weakens.  He said it’s an historically weak draft after the top few and compared it to 1999 which had the fewest draftees who played 200 games in X amount of years of tracking. 

 

48 minutes ago, WhenWillItEnd66 said:

Sounds like our 1st rounder could be better used to trade for a need then.

That is not what this quote is telling us. We will draft in the top 8 at a minimum and top 5 is likely. This draft has a stronger top than the 2020 draft IMPO. 

33 minutes ago, Flashsabre said:

Caleb Desnoyers at 5 is very interesting. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, French Collection said:

I just looked at Bob’s list. The only disturbing name I saw near the top was #8 Viktor Eklund. This team has a history of picking 8th and getting 5’11” 161 lb forwards.

Or the brother ? of the better player 🤪

Posted
7 hours ago, Thorner said:

Thompson is a 1C, by leaps and bounds. If Thompson as 1C isn’t getting your team to finish *16/32* the issue is assuredly assuredly with the rest 

You can just feel it, eh? The creeping narrative. 

no. Lol. We do not need to “find a way to draft a 1C”. Nic DeLorean was traded ages ago, we don’t need to time travel back to 2015 

build a competent team. Stop scape goating the few good players. This regime is pathetic if Tage at 1C isn’t good enough for them to build out the rest. We have 2 first overalls on D and a 3rd lol 

If you ranked centers, where would Thompson land?  
he is 50th in 5v5 scoring in the league, he is 115th in corsi (3rd on the Sabres) 

I agree he is a 1C on the Sabres but not sure he ranks in the top half of the league 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Crusader1969 said:

If you ranked centers, where would Thompson land?  
he is 50th in 5v5 scoring in the league, he is 115th in corsi (3rd on the Sabres) 

I agree he is a 1C on the Sabres but not sure he ranks in the top half of the league 

I would say Corsi is not a very reflective measure of Thompson's value he's got one of the deadliest shots in the league.

I kind of hear what you're saying overall though, but the problem is it would be almost impossible to improve on Thompson without losing a trade. Teams don't give up those players. Our only hope is to stumble on a player like him in the draft.

 

Posted
9 hours ago, French Collection said:

I just looked at Bob’s list. The only disturbing name I saw near the top was #8 Viktor Eklund. This team has a history of picking 8th and getting 5’11” 161 lb forwards.

Get worried. I saw him ranked as high as 6th. 

There are a number of fairly big centers in the top 10. Desnoyers is one of them as @LGR4GM said above. 

If we draft Eklund I might just have to find another team. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...