Jump to content

Will Adams acquire a legit top 6 forward or 2/3 center before next season? Who do think is still available to acquire?


Will Adams Improve the Forwards before next season?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Adams add a top 6 forward before next season?

    • yes
      17
    • no
      64
  2. 2. Will Adams add a 2/3 Center before next season?

    • yes
      11
    • no
      70


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Don't mistake my argument as saying Adams has to "win" or even "break even" value-wise on every deal.

My argument in the post you quoted was twofold:

  • That I perceive Chevy's situation and "market value" adding up to "we haven't seen his final offer"
  • Adams needs to do his due diligence in maximizing any potential deal he is negotiating.

Its impossible to have a good discussion about whether or not Adams should just pay the current price when we don't know what the price is.

Agree, but if the price is comparable to any similar asset and what they moved for in the past, im paying it 

It would have to be a historic ask for me to decline 

So I don’t see much argumentative standing there. Is Chevy asking for more assets than a player of Ehlers ilk has ever gotten? If not, I’m paying it 

Posted
2 hours ago, Thorny said:

Agree, but if the price is comparable to any similar asset and what they moved for in the past, im paying it 

It would have to be a historic ask for me to decline 

So I don’t see much argumentative standing there. Is Chevy asking for more assets than a player of Ehlers ilk has ever gotten? If not, I’m paying it 

I think Dudacek point is that it is.  Atleast based on the info out there.  Much more than Sergachev went for (with term). 

Posted
1 minute ago, Derrico said:

I think Dudacek point is that it is.  Atleast based on the info out there.  Much more than Sergachev went for (with term). 

It also obviously changes the equation if we are giving up players off our current roster. Like, the ones we want. It’s the futures assets pool that im referring to when I say I’d pay the price, that should be made more clear 

Posted
3 hours ago, Thorny said:

Agree, but if the price is comparable to any similar asset and what they moved for in the past, im paying it 

It would have to be a historic ask for me to decline 

So I don’t see much argumentative standing there. Is Chevy asking for more assets than a player of Ehlers ilk has ever gotten? If not, I’m paying it 

Your Murray then, how did that GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted
On 7/1/2024 at 8:55 PM, Weave said:

KA sounded to me like he had finished what he had arrived to do.  I think he’s done.

He made the trade of Middlestat. Do think he will trade but he isn't giving up on 2-3 Top Prospects he has groomed in Amerks

No way he trades Levi, Kulich or Savoie

Say he might trade UPL, doesn't like when players don't accept his contracts if that indeed is what is happening. Just look a Ulmark

On 7/1/2024 at 8:55 PM, Weave said:

KA sounded to me like he had finished what he had arrived to do.  I think he’s done.

He made the trade of Middlestat. Do think he will trade but he isn't giving up on 2-3 Top Prospects he has groomed in Amerks

No way he trades Levi, Kulich or Savoie

Say he might trade UPL, doesn't like when players don't accept his contracts if that indeed is what is happening. Just look a Ulmark

Posted
5 hours ago, dudacek said:

I hope to god you aren’t repeating 3rd or 4th hand that AI-generated pap that was quoted elsewhere on the site?

Or, I guess more accurately I hope you are. 😁

I think it's mostly Winnipeg fans wishing it's Tuch but idk. It's out there. I wouldn't be surprised if Buffalo and Winnipeg are talking. They need to move McGroarty. We have prospects. Maybe Adams thinks somebody might rather be in Buffalo than Winnipeg. Two teams that have trouble landing free agents so it's not shocking to think they are talking. It just better not be Tuch. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

I think it's mostly Winnipeg fans wishing it's Tuch but idk. It's out there. I wouldn't be surprised if Buffalo and Winnipeg are talking. They need to move McGroarty. We have prospects. Maybe Adams thinks somebody might rather be in Buffalo than Winnipeg. Two teams that have trouble landing free agents so it's not shocking to think they are talking. It just better not be Tuch. 

Tuch to Winnipeg would gut him. Many fans would lose their minds. That would be cold for KA to do that to the player who wants to be in Buffalo more than any other on his team.

Chevy must see him as his new Wheeler.


The thing I don’t like about McGroarty is his demand for NHL ice time. He is the type of prospect who resembles a 3C. Savoie has a higher ceiling and that is probably who they want.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, French Collection said:

Tuch to Winnipeg would gut him. Many fans would lose their minds. That would be cold for KA to do that to the player who wants to be in Buffalo more than any other on his team.

Chevy must see him as his new Wheeler.


The thing I don’t like about McGroarty is his demand for NHL ice time. He is the type of prospect who resembles a 3C. Savoie has a higher ceiling and that is probably who they want.

Savoie is a likely candidate. They might be familiar with him and think since he was in Moose Jaw he might not mind being in Winnipeg. 

McGroarty is exactly what you want in a 3C imo and as for the "demand" is that not pretty much the same as Levi? He is still raw and green though and not really what I want in our 3C next season. Down the road though yes. Different type of player to our prospect pool or at least most of it. 

Posted
6 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

Savoie is a likely candidate. They might be familiar with him and think since he was in Moose Jaw he might not mind being in Winnipeg. 

McGroarty is exactly what you want in a 3C imo and as for the "demand" is that not pretty much the same as Levi? He is still raw and green though and not really what I want in our 3C next season. Down the road though yes. Different type of player to our prospect pool or at least most of it. 

Savoie played two seasons in Winnipeg, they would know him well.

  • Agree 1
Posted

My belief is that there are still moves to be done. A top six forward, most likely winger and a 3C center. While they haven’t been able to consummate the big deal, the teams they are talking to haven’t made their moves either. Winnipeg, for instance, still wants to move Ehlers, the only questions are 1) price now compared to what they think they  can get at deadline, 2) if they are as good as they expect, do they really want to deal with it at deadline, 3) will he be a distraction 4) maybe, like last year, they come to terms on a contract and he signs for eight years. 
It’s all conjecture at this point. I thought they would finish the deal at the draft.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, tom webster said:

My belief is that there are still moves to be done. A top six forward, most likely winger and a 3C center. While they haven’t been able to consummate the big deal, the teams they are talking to haven’t made their moves either. Winnipeg, for instance, still wants to move Ehlers, the only questions are 1) price now compared to what they think they  can get at deadline, 2) if they are as good as they expect, do they really want to deal with it at deadline, 3) will he be a distraction 4) maybe, like last year, they come to terms on a contract and he signs for eight years. 
It’s all conjecture at this point. I thought they would finish the deal at the draft.

For Tuch or for prospects?

Posted
2 minutes ago, triumph_communes said:

For Tuch or for prospects?

If you're bringing in Ehlers but Tuch is going out in the process, you aren't really making any progress towards improving your top 6.  Now, if the other 1/2 of the player portion of the Eichel trade is what's going out the door as part of the package, you are improving the top 6.

Even with Iafello coming back in the package, don't see how they're improving enough when Tuch is removed from the roster to make it make sense.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, tom webster said:

My belief is that there are still moves to be done. A top six forward, most likely winger and a 3C center. While they haven’t been able to consummate the big deal, the teams they are talking to haven’t made their moves either. Winnipeg, for instance, still wants to move Ehlers, the only questions are 1) price now compared to what they think they  can get at deadline, 2) if they are as good as they expect, do they really want to deal with it at deadline, 3) will he be a distraction 4) maybe, like last year, they come to terms on a contract and he signs for eight years. 
It’s all conjecture at this point. I thought they would finish the deal at the draft.

No help is coming outside Savoie beating someone out for a job.  

The mostly likely time Adams gets someone to come here is at the deadline, but he may not be the GM by that time if this team stumbles out of the gate.  

Posted
13 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

Unfortunately Savoie doesn’t have as much trade value around the league as we would hope 

I’ve said for a couple years that he wasn’t considered a top prospect and that he wasn’t held in high regard within the Sabres organization let alone the league. That doesn’t mean he can’t prove everyone wrong but Buffalo is definitely not counting on him to be a difference maker.

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, tom webster said:

I’ve said for a couple years that he wasn’t considered a top prospect and that he wasn’t held in high regard within the Sabres organization let alone the league. That doesn’t mean he can’t prove everyone wrong but Buffalo is definitely not counting on him to be a difference maker.

2 more years in Jr impo stunted his development. He needs the AHL challenge. 

Posted (edited)
On 7/4/2024 at 2:51 PM, LGR4GM said:

2 more years in Jr impo stunted his development. He needs the AHL challenge. 

I agree.  The CHL rules really hurt Savoie.  If he had been 1 day older, he'd have played all season in the A and likely be viewed as a excellent prospect after averaging a pt a game as 19 year old.

His height is also an issue right now in the NHL.  All through the draft coverage the analysts talked about the draftees being 6'2 or taller.  They also talked about how big the Panthers were (only 2 regulars were under 6', Erod and Cousins - both listed 5-11).  

This is not a bar to Savoie succeeding in the NHL, but if teams are now valuing bigger players it will drive down the value of smaller guys even ones as skilled as Savoie if the skill set isn't viewed as "elite."

Personally, I think he is going to prove them all wrong.  I see Adams' failure to secure real forward help as a huge opportunity for Savoie, Kulich and Rosen and I believe Savoie is the best of the bunch.  The kid centered Benson in Wpg and I can see him beating out Krebs to play between Zucker and Greenway.  

 

Edited by GASabresIUFAN
  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...