Brawndo Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 (edited) Per Chad DeDominicis 1 year deal Edited July 1 by Brawndo Quote
RochesterExpat Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Are we trading Krebs then? Please don't tell me Krebs is going to be the 3C. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Just now, RochesterExpat said: Are we trading Krebs then? Please don't tell me Krebs is going to be the 3C. No, Krebs is the insurance policy if Adams can’t find a 2/3C in trade. 1 Quote
triumph_communes Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Good forward on a bad team. Sneaky good acquisition 3 Quote
Brawndo Posted July 1 Author Report Posted July 1 If this is true, the Sabres might have a shutdown fourth line Quote
nfreeman Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. 8 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 It appears that the 4th line got re-made, for sure. (It actually appears that we may have 1.5+ 4th lines?) 2 1 Quote
RochesterExpat Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Just now, nfreeman said: Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. As long as we still fill the 3C role, I don't think anyone who wanted the bottom six revamped should be complaining. 4 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 1 minute ago, RochesterExpat said: As long as we still fill the 3C role, I don't think anyone who wanted the bottom six revamped should be complaining. And if you didn't want the 4th line revamped - "what the heck were you watching last season?" 2 1 Quote
Scottysabres Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 3 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. Exactly, and all kidding aside, I'm estatic over what's going on right now. Bout time! But never to late. 2 Quote
Thorner Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 8 minutes ago, RochesterExpat said: Are we trading Krebs then? Please don't tell me Krebs is going to be the 3C. He’s the 3C right now 5 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. 75% of that expected reno is the 3C tho so we’ll see Quote
bob_sauve28 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 8 minutes ago, triumph_communes said: Good forward on a bad team. Sneaky good acquisition What do you like about him? Quote
dudacek Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 So they saw Washington sneak in and went after the only line on the Caps that was actually good at their role? It was Dowd I thought they were after and he”s the only one they didn’t get. His numbers don’t really show it, but I remember him as an annoying *****. 2 1 Quote
triumph_communes Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Just now, bob_sauve28 said: What do you like about him? He’s the other ridiculous d zone start guy who managed to have a positive +/- despite it. Shutdown specialist. We stole from Washington the only thing that kept them competitive last year 3 2 Quote
bob_sauve28 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Just now, triumph_communes said: He’s the other ridiculous d zone start guy who managed to have a positive +/- despite it. Shutdown specialist. We stole from Washington the only thing that kept them competitive last year We will be tougher to play against this year, I hope then 2 Quote
mjd1001 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 (edited) Another VERY fast guy. With the exception of Zucker (who isn't fast, at least not anymore), Kubel, Lafferty, Malenstyn, all have or are bordering on elite speed. Sure, they don't have the offensive ability to go with it, but they are all very fast skaters. You want to develop a 3rd or 4th line with a great forcheck, I guess this is how they are doing it. Edited July 1 by mjd1001 6 1 Quote
nucci Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 25 minutes ago, triumph_communes said: Good forward on a bad team. Sneaky good acquisition why is it sneaky? Quote
triumph_communes Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 3 minutes ago, nucci said: why is it sneaky? Talking heads probably won’t even mention it yet the impact it will have on the team will be significant 1 1 Quote
kas23 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 Just now, triumph_communes said: Talking heads probably won’t even mention it yet the impact it will have on the team will be significant Until proven otherwise (ie he signs), this is a guy using Buffalo to get a better deal. Hence the vague rumor floated. 3 Quote
Archie Lee Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 I get my Aube-Kubel's mixed up with my Aston-Reese's. 1 Quote
Archie Lee Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 43 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: It appears that the 4th line got re-made, for sure. (It actually appears that we may have 1.5+ 4th lines?) Lafferty is not a great answer as 4C in my view. Better as a 4th line winger who can play C if needed (ie: a tougher/grittier Girgs). Unless Malenstyn is the C? I still think we are a C short. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.