Brawndo Posted Monday at 04:41 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:41 PM (edited) Per Chad DeDominicis 1 year deal Edited Monday at 05:47 PM by Brawndo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterExpat Posted Monday at 04:43 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:43 PM Are we trading Krebs then? Please don't tell me Krebs is going to be the 3C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted Monday at 04:44 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:44 PM Just now, RochesterExpat said: Are we trading Krebs then? Please don't tell me Krebs is going to be the 3C. No, Krebs is the insurance policy if Adams can’t find a 2/3C in trade. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Lee Posted Monday at 04:46 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:46 PM As 12th/13th forward? Sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triumph_communes Posted Monday at 04:47 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:47 PM Good forward on a bad team. Sneaky good acquisition 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted Monday at 04:47 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 04:47 PM If this is true, the Sabres might have a shutdown fourth line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted Monday at 04:47 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:47 PM Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted Monday at 04:48 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:48 PM It appears that the 4th line got re-made, for sure. (It actually appears that we may have 1.5+ 4th lines?) 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterExpat Posted Monday at 04:48 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:48 PM Just now, nfreeman said: Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. As long as we still fill the 3C role, I don't think anyone who wanted the bottom six revamped should be complaining. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusader1969 Posted Monday at 04:50 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:50 PM 1 minute ago, RochesterExpat said: As long as we still fill the 3C role, I don't think anyone who wanted the bottom six revamped should be complaining. And if you didn't want the 4th line revamped - "what the heck were you watching last season?" 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted Monday at 04:52 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:52 PM 3 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. Exactly, and all kidding aside, I'm estatic over what's going on right now. Bout time! But never to late. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorny Posted Monday at 04:52 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:52 PM 8 minutes ago, RochesterExpat said: Are we trading Krebs then? Please don't tell me Krebs is going to be the 3C. He’s the 3C right now 5 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Well, we all wanted, and expected, a major renovation in the bottom 6. No surprise so far. 75% of that expected reno is the 3C tho so we’ll see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted Monday at 04:55 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:55 PM 8 minutes ago, triumph_communes said: Good forward on a bad team. Sneaky good acquisition What do you like about him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted Monday at 04:56 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:56 PM So they saw Washington sneak in and went after the only line on the Caps that was actually good at their role? It was Dowd I thought they were after and he”s the only one they didn’t get. His numbers don’t really show it, but I remember him as an annoying *****. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triumph_communes Posted Monday at 04:57 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:57 PM Just now, bob_sauve28 said: What do you like about him? He’s the other ridiculous d zone start guy who managed to have a positive +/- despite it. Shutdown specialist. We stole from Washington the only thing that kept them competitive last year 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted Monday at 04:57 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:57 PM Just now, triumph_communes said: He’s the other ridiculous d zone start guy who managed to have a positive +/- despite it. Shutdown specialist. We stole from Washington the only thing that kept them competitive last year We will be tougher to play against this year, I hope then 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjd1001 Posted Monday at 05:00 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:00 PM (edited) Another VERY fast guy. With the exception of Zucker (who isn't fast, at least not anymore), Kubel, Lafferty, Malenstyn, all have or are bordering on elite speed. Sure, they don't have the offensive ability to go with it, but they are all very fast skaters. You want to develop a 3rd or 4th line with a great forcheck, I guess this is how they are doing it. Edited Monday at 05:00 PM by mjd1001 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted Monday at 05:11 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:11 PM Any update? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted Monday at 05:12 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:12 PM 25 minutes ago, triumph_communes said: Good forward on a bad team. Sneaky good acquisition why is it sneaky? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triumph_communes Posted Monday at 05:17 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:17 PM 3 minutes ago, nucci said: why is it sneaky? Talking heads probably won’t even mention it yet the impact it will have on the team will be significant 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kas23 Posted Monday at 05:18 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:18 PM Just now, triumph_communes said: Talking heads probably won’t even mention it yet the impact it will have on the team will be significant Until proven otherwise (ie he signs), this is a guy using Buffalo to get a better deal. Hence the vague rumor floated. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Lee Posted Monday at 05:27 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:27 PM I get my Aube-Kubel's mixed up with my Aston-Reese's. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sauve28 Posted Monday at 05:29 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:29 PM Something wrong with fax machine here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Lee Posted Monday at 05:33 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:33 PM 43 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: It appears that the 4th line got re-made, for sure. (It actually appears that we may have 1.5+ 4th lines?) Lafferty is not a great answer as 4C in my view. Better as a 4th line winger who can play C if needed (ie: a tougher/grittier Girgs). Unless Malenstyn is the C? I still think we are a C short. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted Monday at 05:46 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 05:46 PM 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.