SHAAAUGHT!!! Posted Monday at 10:17 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 10:17 PM 1 hour ago, Rasmus_ said: I apologize for my poisonous rants, I'll cool it. Sorry again. I gotta say this is pretty amazing. Very rarely people online take criticism, apologize, and then course correct. Well done Rasmus_. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted Tuesday at 12:42 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 12:42 AM 4 hours ago, Scottysabres said: Are you ok? I have the number to a great call-in therapy service, and you can have my time slot. Call 803-0550, 3:15pm, you can try daily, but they are a bit booked, every 3rd day should do. I called that number. I ended up with a woman with a sexy voice talking dirty to me. After the titillating call I found out that my credit card had an exorbitant charge for a counseling service. Thanks a lot, pal. 😀 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted Tuesday at 12:48 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 12:48 AM 4 minutes ago, JohnC said: I called that number. I ended up with a woman with a sexy voice talking dirty to me. After the titillating call I found out that my credit card had an exorbitant charge for a counseling service. Thanks a lot, pal. 😀 You spent more then Kyven did today......your welcome 😉 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted Tuesday at 12:50 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 12:50 AM (edited) 2 minutes ago, Scottysabres said: You spent more then Kyven did today......your welcome 😉 I bet you that he didn't get a bo--ner out of the calls he received. 😀 Edited Tuesday at 12:50 AM by JohnC 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottysabres Posted Tuesday at 01:00 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:00 AM 4 minutes ago, JohnC said: I bet you that he didn't get a bo--ner out of the calls he received. 😀 Well, we know that's true since the calls apparently lasted for 30 seconds..... KA: "Tell me you like being smothered in cheerios" Player: "That's kinky, let me think on that for a sec....hello? Kevyn? hello?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted Tuesday at 08:10 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 08:10 AM I just looked up his stats. His numbers are a lot lower than I thought they were, and he's been injured a lot too. I thought he was better than that. I think we just paid 5 million for the equivalent of what we got out of Conor Sheary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlach Posted Tuesday at 11:45 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 11:45 AM He will play one season, be moved at the deadline, and help a playoff team. When asked about how playing for Buffalo was he will probably be polite. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted Tuesday at 11:58 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 11:58 AM 10 hours ago, Scottysabres said: Well, we know that's true since the calls apparently lasted for 30 seconds..... KA: "Tell me you like being smothered in cheerios" Player: "That's kinky, let me think on that for a sec....hello? Kevyn? hello?" If the player would have answered he preferred corn flakes he would have been signed. 😃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabresparaavida Posted Tuesday at 12:07 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 12:07 PM 14 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Where would you rank his replacement, Krebs, on the current roster? 10th, 11th? Honestly? Our 12th best forward right now. It’s possible he has some development and jumps up some, but he was 11th in total points last year, only one point ahead of Nicolas Aube-Kubel. And In a per game basis, NAK beats him. Lafferty, NAK, and Malenstvn all have a better defensive game as well. After last season, I really only wanted Krebs around in a 13th forward role. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted Tuesday at 01:03 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:03 PM 20 hours ago, LGR4GM said: I think every post of yours is either Adams sucks or something about Mittelstadt You say that like it's a bad thing. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted Tuesday at 01:14 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:14 PM 17 hours ago, Taro T said: aren't people wanting a better 4D than Jokiharju? That's similar to wanting better than Krebs at 3C. Joki is closer to being a competent 4D than Krebs is to 3C by a fair margin. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted Tuesday at 01:18 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:18 PM 17 hours ago, mjd1001 said: In all the arguments I have gotten with here with everyone, and there have been some big ones, I have never, ever blocked anyone I put people on Ignore all the time. Maybe it's me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted Tuesday at 01:18 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:18 PM 1 minute ago, Doohickie said: Joki is closer to being a competent 4D than Krebs is to 3C by a fair margin. Not positive about that. But the position is likely closer to being adequately filled. Thus having written: (Not completely analogous because Byram, Clifton, Samuelsson, or Johnson could be.) in the post you partially (as is typical for you) quoted. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTS Posted Tuesday at 01:20 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:20 PM I see Zucker as the more offensive minded Okposo replacement. He's here to provide some level of experience and leadership to the team and chip in where he can. It's a lot for him, but we all agreed on overpayment being required so here we are. It took $5M to get Zucker to come to Buffalo. use that in comparisons to other players to figure out what it would have taken to get them to sign here. The team has to win and until then.. it's develop from within because it's all they have. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted Tuesday at 01:21 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:21 PM 2 minutes ago, Taro T said: you partially (as is typical for you) quoted. You say that like it's a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted Tuesday at 01:23 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:23 PM Just now, Doohickie said: You say that like it's a bad thing. Well, when it often leads to what was said being completely out of context, yes, it is a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted Tuesday at 01:24 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:24 PM (edited) Seriously, I prefer quoting the part of a post I'm replying to, than quoting a whole dissertation and forcing a reader to wade through it to figure out what I'm talking about. Edited Tuesday at 01:24 PM by Doohickie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted Tuesday at 01:31 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:31 PM 3 minutes ago, Doohickie said: Seriously, I prefer quoting the part of a post I'm replying to, than quoting a whole dissertation and forcing a reader to wade through it to figure out what I'm talking about. Bolding is your friend. At a minimum, you could have the courtesy to ... what you've removed. So people not reading every post realize there's a very good chance that what you highlighted wasn't necessarily the meat of the quoted post and possibly was even counter to what was actually meant. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted Tuesday at 01:35 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:35 PM I'll take that under consideration 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted Tuesday at 01:43 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 01:43 PM I kinda think Zucker will play on the 2nd line with Cozens and JJP, putting Benson on the 3rd line with Greenway and please-let-it-be-an-interesting-new-acquisition-who-isn't-Krebs. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#freejame Posted Tuesday at 02:20 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 02:20 PM Oh man now I’m confused because I like to both bold and snip. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted Tuesday at 02:50 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 02:50 PM 14 hours ago, Scottysabres said: You spent more then Kyven did today......your welcome 😉 *than 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM I like the fact that Zucker's highlights show that even nowadays he will go to the net with or without the puck. Is Kevyn lagging in real life? A lot of his signings this year would of made just as much if not even more sense last offseason. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted Tuesday at 02:58 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 02:58 PM 4 minutes ago, thewookie1 said: I like the fact that Zucker's highlights show that even nowadays he will go to the net with or without the puck. Is Kevyn lagging in real life? A lot of his signings this year would of made just as much if not even more sense last offseason. Kevyn is not proactive, he is reactive. He lacks creative problem solving and it is very evident to me personally that he has a major inability to shift quickly when opportunity arises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triumph_communes Posted Tuesday at 03:34 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 03:34 PM 35 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Kevyn is not proactive, he is reactive. He lacks creative problem solving and it is very evident to me personally that he has a major inability to shift quickly when opportunity arises. Doesn’t really matter if he’s following direction from Lindy now though 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.