LGR4GM Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 12 minutes ago, Buffalonill said: I never said he wouldn't make it ? I was just stating Datsyuk is generational And I was stating he's not magically small because he's 1" under 6ft as other players have been just fine at such a size... and he's 18. Quote
LGR4GM Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 My point is simple. None of you would mention his size being some hindrance if he was 6' 190lbs but are having issues cuz he's 5'11" 190lbs saying he's just like Östlund. Ik why, because dumb talking heads like Pronman are vomiting that out. Quote
Buffalonill Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 23 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: And I was stating he's not magically small because he's 1" under 6ft as other players have been just fine at such a size... and he's 18. I don't think I ever criticized this pick Quote
nfreeman Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 8 hours ago, fiftyone said: This may have already been discussed, so apologies if I missed it. But in KA's press conference, he was asked about the trade down. He said that when they were deciding whether to go from 11 to 14, there was one player where they'd be very upset if he ended up being there at 11 after they traded out. Any thoughts / ideas of who that may have been? 7 hours ago, Flashsabre said: Iginla Was that reported, or is it your assessment/guess? 2 hours ago, Buffalonill said: He was a generational talent there will never be one like him . "Generational" is a bit strong here. Datsyuk was a great player, to be sure -- one of the best in the world for quite a few years and one of Russia's all-timers. 3 hours ago, Weave said: Krebs is likely going to have to devote himself to becoming a shutdown forward to maintain an NHL career. Otherwise, he is Europe bound at the end of this contract. 1 hour ago, dudacek said: His defensive numbers were actual quite good last year, and 20-ish points is fine for a 4C. He drastically reduced his giveaways, and his shot-blocking and hitting numbers were fine. In terms of 5-on-5 play there is no need to upgrade him in that 4C role. This is a kid who has really been asked to transform his game over the past 2 years, from a high-risk offensive distributor to a conscientious, hard-to-play-against checker. It's been a big ask, and he's really worked hard to make the adjustment. I see his question as two-fold: How much specialization do they need on their 4th line, because he doesn't bring the high-end PK, faceoff, or physicality elements that coaches often look for from those players. Can he tap back into his innate playmaking skills at all without losing his defensive gains? Because that would make him a perfect 3C. I think he ultimately will settle into a long-term career and be pretty good in a 3C role. I just don't know if he can get there this year, or if the Sabres can afford to wait. Good range of outcomes here. I like Krebsie and want to see him at age 25 after 2 years of being coached by Lindy. It's very possible he could develop into a credible 3C by then. OTOH, I despair of his hands and I have a hard time seeing him producing offense in the NHL. 1 Quote
Buffalonill Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 30 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Was that reported, or is it your assessment/guess? "Generational" is a bit strong here. Datsyuk was a great player, to be sure -- one of the best in the world for quite a few years and one of Russia's all-timers. Good range of outcomes here. I like Krebsie and want to see him at age 25 after 2 years of being coached by Lindy. It's very possible he could develop into a credible 3C by then. OTOH, I despair of his hands and I have a hard time seeing him producing offense in the NHL. He changed the game of hockey without him deking wouldn't be where it is today He basically invited the Alley-oop of hockey And let's not forget probably the greatest 2 way player Quote
Pimlach Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 3 hours ago, dudacek said: Steve Yzerman 5'11" 185 Joe Sakic 5'!1" 185 Pat Lafontaine 5'10" 180 Dale Hawerchuk 5'11" 185 Wayne Gretzky 6'0" 185 Mike Peca 5'11 181 Danny Briere 5'10 181 Chris Drury 5'10" 195 Derek Roy 5'8 187 Steve Ott 6'0" 189 Nikita Kucherov 5'11" 182 Kiril Kaprizov 5'!0 202 Sebastian Aho 6'0" 176 Travis Konecny 5'!0 192 Connor Bedard 5'10 185 Seriously dude, the amount of guys Helenius' size to have successful NHL careers is so ridiculously long, it's unbelievable people would even bring it up. Throughout positions, eras, franchises and roles. In a lot of ways, the 5'10 195-pounders with the big thighs and butts have an advantage, losing a low centre of gravity and burst to get underneath and around defenders. Absolutely. The guys with big strong thighs and butts have an advantage. You could see that with our own Gilbert way back in the day. Core strength and legs help forwards get up and down the ice and help them with leverage for puck battles. Helenius has good size already and a frame to grow on. I like the comparisons to Barkov’s game as well. Responsible both ways. 1 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 I wonder if Kulich will see more time on the wing in Rocheste in regards to potential - how would you rank Kulich vs Östlund vs Helenius ?? Quote
Crusader1969 Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 20 hours ago, Pimlach said: Absolutely. The guys with big strong thighs and butts have an advantage. You could see that with our own Gilbert way back in the day. Core strength and legs help forwards get up and down the ice and help them with leverage for puck battles. Helenius has good size already and a frame to grow on. I like the comparisons to Barkov’s game as well. Responsible both ways. Maybe we should say Lundell'a game rather than Barkov? Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 I just had a chance to watch my recording of the 1st rd of the NHL draft. A couple of interesting stats they mentioned. During the U18's Helenius lead the tourney in possession and in passes that resulted in a shot on goal. I'd love to see him in Rochester in the fall. Should be interesting to see how he measures up against Östlund, Savoie and Kulich (assuming some of those guys aren't traded). 2 Quote
dudacek Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 2 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I just had a chance to watch my recording of the 1st rd of the NHL draft. A couple of interesting stats they mentioned. During the U18's Helenius lead the tourney in possession and in passes that resulted in a shot on goal. I'd love to see him in Rochester in the fall. Should be interesting to see how he measures up against Östlund, Savoie and Kulich (assuming some of those guys aren't traded). From what Kevyn said, it might be their plan A. His performance in Liiga has them thinking he might be ready. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 3 minutes ago, dudacek said: From what Kevyn said, it might be their plan A. His performance in Liiga has them thinking he might be ready. I'd send him to Rochester if possible. No reason to leave him in Liiga any longer when he needs to learn NA pace. 5 Quote
Flashsabre Posted July 2 Report Posted July 2 I see a Michael Peca without the fiery open ice checks. Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 the interesting part is that njd had Helenius as their #2 guy left by pick 10. Quote
dudacek Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 Just now, LGR4GM said: the interesting part is that njd had Helenius as their #2 guy left by pick 10. I think I posted about it earlier, but McKenzie reported 4 scouts he surveyed had the kid in their top 7 1 1 Quote
Flashsabre Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 (edited) I think Lundell and Cirelli are good comps as the type of centre he will become. Not the flashy, sexy player but the centre you are dying to have in your middle six. If his offence pops then you have a special talent but I see him as a lynchpin middle 6 centre as early as 25-26 Edited July 3 by Flashsabre 1 1 Quote
Thorner Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 There are quite a few “another Benson situation developing” rumours out there right now…anyone else get the feeling we are slowly, likes lobsters in increasingly hot water, being messaging-slow-played, almost Inception-like, to the idea Helenius just *needs* be our 3C this season? “Who is out there that can guarantee you better results?” 1 1 Quote
Night Train Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 FWIW, the locals are impressed. Multiple talking heads mentioning how he stands out. May attend the 3 on 3 tomorrow morning to see for myself. 1 Quote
dudacek Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 27 minutes ago, Thorny said: There are quite a few “another Benson situation developing” rumours out there right now…anyone else get the feeling we are slowly, likes lobsters in increasingly hot water, being messaging-slow-played, almost Inception-like, to the idea Helenius just *needs* be our 3C this season? “Who is out there that can guarantee you better results?” If there are no other additions should there be an open competition in training camp with Helenius, Savoie and Kulich to elbow aside Krebs? Or is it essential that Krebs get the job because of his experience? What will break first, @Thorny’s unbendable guideline that this team cannot, under any circumstances, put even more rookies in the lineup, or his unquenchable distaste for Krebs (and his tattoo) in the 3C role? 1 Quote
Thorner Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 3 minutes ago, dudacek said: If there are no other additions should there be an open competition in training camp with Helenius, Savoie and Kulich to elbow aside Krebs? Or is it essential that Krebs get the job because of his experience? What will break first, @Thorny’s unbendable guideline that this team cannot, under any circumstances, put even more rookies in the lineup, or his unquenchable distaste for Krebs (and his tattoo) in the 3C role? You’ll have to keep on wondering until you break me, physically. The other side ain’t happening 2 Quote
Taro T Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 5 minutes ago, dudacek said: If there are no other additions should there be an open competition in training camp with Helenius, Savoie and Kulich to elbow aside Krebs? Or is it essential that Krebs get the job because of his experience? What will break first, @Thorny’s unbendable guideline that this team cannot, under any circumstances, put even more rookies in the lineup, or his unquenchable distaste for Krebs (and his tattoo) in the 3C role? 🤔 1 Quote
Huckleberry Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 On 6/29/2024 at 3:01 AM, Huckleberry said: Its a steal, i like it. Called it early, just saying 😛 Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 (edited) 1 hour ago, Thorny said: There are quite a few “another Benson situation developing” rumours out there right now…anyone else get the feeling we are slowly, likes lobsters in increasingly hot water, being messaging-slow-played, almost Inception-like, to the idea Helenius just *needs* be our 3C this season? “Who is out there that can guarantee you better results?” Like Benson, I'd like Helenius to spend a year in Rochester Edited July 4 by LGR4GM Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.