JustOneParade Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 7 minutes ago, Thorny said: Stick a fork in ‘em. Byram is terrible lol It seems any good player that comes to the Sabres becomes bad. Conversely, any Sabre that leaves become good (or very good) elsewhere. Isn’t that the ultimate indictment of this organization? 4 1 Quote
Claude Balls Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 minute ago, inkman said: He has fit right in. Big kid that plays that way. I vote for not. Just took a roughing penalty too. I pray to God he gets a full year in Roch. Buffalo will castrate him within a month. Quote
Goldseatsaud Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 How can adams with a Straight face go to his fan base and say we’re young team again. 3 Quote
7+6=13 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 This is the Ruff residence, who may I ask is calling? 1 1 2 Quote
Claude Balls Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) 5 minutes ago, inkman said: Unless GMKA is trafficking meth, I doubt it. He's wouldn't make enough just trafficking it. He must have a lab behind his mansion where he spends all his time producing it. He sure as ***** doesnt spend his time trying to produce a decent hockey team. Edited April 7 by Claude Balls Quote
JustOneParade Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 Game recap: Sabres win the last 53 minutes! 🙄 Quote
inkman Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 Just now, Claude Balls said: Just took a roughing penalty too. I pray to God he gets a full year in Roch. Buffalo will castrate him within a month. With him and Novikov in the org, they finally have some players with size that use it. But they can’t be expected to lead the way in that regard. They need players like Tkachuk & Trouba. Physical players that lead and other teams are leery of. The team also needs players that can drop the gloves. I’m not talking about Reeves or any one dimensional goons. Power forwards that stick up for teammates. Dmen that pounce on you if you look at the goalie sideways. Almost every good team has players like this. Buffalo does not. 2 4 3 Quote
Mango Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 14 minutes ago, Thorny said: Stick a fork in ‘em. Byram is terrible lol We traded a current top 6C for a potential top 4D. It is a maddening trade for me, not because of BB. But because based on everything this org preaches about committing to and developing our own talent, Mitts is a slam dunk extension and we traded him for “might be better later”. Just like we keep calling the 2C role Cozens even though Mitts has been much better for 1.5 years. 1 Quote
Claude Balls Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) 4 minutes ago, inkman said: With him and Novikov in the org, they finally have some players with size that use it. But they can’t be expected to lead the way in that regard. They need players like Tkachuk & Trouba. Physical players that lead and other teams are leery of. The team also needs players that can drop the gloves. I’m not talking about Reeves or any one dimensional goons. Power forwards that stick up for teammates. Dmen that pounce on you if you look at the goalie sideways. Almost every good team has players like this. Buffalo does not. That's what I love about the Amerks. If an opposing player farts near their goaltender, all five guys move right in and clear the area. Every single time!!!!! Sabres just skate away in their skirts. Edited April 7 by Claude Balls 2 Quote
Pimlach Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 2 hours ago, mjd1001 said: Which means they are a lot better once you hit the first intermission, meaning the coaches are great at making adjustments. It can be argued either way. To me wins and losses, goals scored vs allowed across the entire game matter, when goals are scored vs allowed mean virtually nothing compared to the totals across the entire game. They lost a lot of games in the first period. They fall behind and then they press. The other team can play a simpler game if they lead by 2 goals after 1 period. You are a good stat guy. Look it up. How many winning teams consistently lose the first period? Maybe they got better after the first admission because they woke up. I doubt the coaches did anything, what was the adjustment? Stop passing to the guys in Red? Take more shots? They didn’t score after the first. 1 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 The last couple of games have proved that there are a couple of players who should not be in the opening night line-up 1) Jeff Skinner - the stink of 1000 games and no playoffs is much too strong to ignore 2) Henri Jokiharju- minus 2 within the first 5 mins. Both times with soft D. (Yes I know that Quinn made terrible passes on both). Then the penalty that led to the 3rd goal The bottom 6 needs a lot of work. - only guys on the roster right now that should be considered are Greenway, Krebs (though that's not 100%), Girgensons (4th line winger). Meaning you could see 4 or 5 new faces to fill out the bottom 2 lines Quote
TheAud Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 18 minutes ago, JustOneParade said: She’s simply a phenomenal player. Indeed. But South Carolina looks like an absolute machine. Will be tough for Iowa to overcome. Quote
Crusader1969 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 minute ago, Crusader1969 said: The last couple of games have proved that there are a couple of players who should not be in the opening night line-up 1) Jeff Skinner - the stink of 1000 games and no playoffs is much too strong to ignore 2) Henri Jokiharju- minus 2 within the first 5 mins. Both times with soft D. (Yes I know that Quinn made terrible passes on both). Then the penalty that led to the 3rd goal The bottom 6 needs a lot of work. - only guys on the roster right now that should be considered are Greenway, Krebs (though that's not 100%), Girgensons (4th line winger). Meaning you could see 4 or 5 new faces to fill out the bottom 2 lines I will add about Joker and please correct me if I'm wrong. It was Joker that iced the puck needlessly prior to the face off where he took the penalty. Time to move on from him Quote
oddoublee Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 24 minutes ago, Thorny said: Stick a fork in ‘em. Byram is terrible lol To be fair to Byram...he needed at least two weeks of DG coaching and the Pegula CC to ruin him 2 1 2 Quote
pastajoe Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 Time to start playing Comrie to improve their draft position. 2 1 Quote
Ogelthorpe Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 My apathy for the Sabres knows no bounds! I think it's hilarious when they fail. They have ruined hockey for me. Depending on off-season I think I'm done with hockey and Sabres 2 1 Quote
Carmel Corn Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 minute ago, pastajoe said: Time to start playing Comrie to improve their draft position. Also to give UPL a break....maybe prevent injury to him as well. 1 1 Quote
Thorner Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) The Sabres average point total per season, the 4 seasons previous to Adams: 74 points The Sabres average point total per season, the 4 seasons Adams has been in charge: 76 points - - - 33 minutes ago, JustOneParade said: It seems any good player that comes to the Sabres becomes bad. Conversely, any Sabre that leaves become good (or very good) elsewhere. Isn’t that the ultimate indictment of this organization? I dunno Mitts looked pretty good here 26 minutes ago, Mango said: We traded a current top 6C for a potential top 4D. It is a maddening trade for me, not because of BB. But because based on everything this org preaches about committing to and developing our own talent, Mitts is a slam dunk extension and we traded him for “might be better later”. Just like we keep calling the 2C role Cozens even though Mitts has been much better for 1.5 years. Mitts is just better, that’s why I don’t like it Edited April 7 by Thorny 1 1 1 Quote
Goldseatsaud Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 9 minutes ago, Ogelthorpe said: My apathy for the Sabres knows no bounds! I think it's hilarious when they fail. They have ruined hockey for me. Depending on off-season I think I'm done with hockey and Sabres It’s gotta be that way. 1 Quote
Sidc3000 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 2 hours ago, Pimlach said: Agree. It’s not an excuse if there is data behind it. Young teams lose. If Adams fields another roster that averages 24-25 next year then they will consistently lose to rosters that average 28 or more. I am more sick of the “good veterans won’t come here” narrative. Great excuse for Adams. The Bills overcame that. Step one for Adams, which he still has not done, is to own it and get everyone that works for him to own it. They need to change the coach. The good veterans won’t come here narrative is true. This organization has been a complete and utter ***** show for 13 years. No player in their right minds will come to Buffalo if they have a choice or waaaay over paid 2 Quote
Sidc3000 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 hour ago, Goldseatsaud said: How can adams with a Straight face go to his fan base and say we’re young team again. He has no choice. Quote
BuffalOhio Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 2 hours ago, bunomatic said: Put Skinny with two jags and he won’t pass to anyone. Why would he? He wouldn’t know how to do it anyway. Absolutely the worst hockey sense on this team. And that’s saying something! 1 Quote
... Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 hour ago, Thorny said: I dunno Mitts looked pretty good here Mitts is just better, that’s why I don’t like it Had the exact same thoughts during the game. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.