Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Bo knows hockey

In his last 11 games he has 0 goals, 1 assist and is -6.  I guess the Sabres no accountability culture has already won him over. 

Not that it's going to make you feel any better but Casey has 1 goal 2 assists and is a minus 6 in his last 5 games on a much better team. For the most part I have only seen the condensed games and one of the problems seems to be they are trying to use him differently. He seems to be in the middle of the ice more than along the walls which is were he is better at gaining puck possession. 

 

Bo himself is in a new system on the back end. Remember how poorly Clifton was playing at the start of the year? I will still take a wait and see approach.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Bo knows hockey

In his last 11 games he has 0 goals, 1 assist and is -6.  I guess the Sabres no accountability culture has already won him over. 

The culture in Buffalo is so bad that McDavid, McKinnon and Matthews could be added to the roster and they would end up looking like Krebs, Jost and VO in just a few games.

  • Disagree 1
Posted
9 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Bo knows hockey

In his last 11 games he has 0 goals, 1 assist and is -6.  I guess the Sabres no accountability culture has already won him over. 

It’s more likely his early play was reflective of the VERY common post-trade bump and that his recent is a return to his season norm, and the reason he was available, rather than indication the Sabres are beating him down 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Thorny said:

It’s more likely his early play was reflective of the VERY common post-trade bump and that his recent is a return to his season norm, and the reason he was available, rather than indication the Sabres are beating him down 

First couple games he was loose and free and playing wide open. They had him in that PP spot as well. Like an adrenalin rush. Then it's back to the routine and learning what the coach wants and this coach don't know what he wants on D but overall like you say, back to normal. 

Posted
On 4/8/2024 at 9:03 AM, oddoublee said:

couldnt agree with you more...our first line is probably best served as a second line on a contending team. as of now, this is what the team realistically looks like from a 'holes' perspective (imo):

1st Line: Peterka   ?   ?

2nd Line: ?   Tage   Tuch

3rd Line: Benson  Cozens  Quinn

4th Line:  Greenway  Krebs  Skinner (i know, i know - prefer he is gone outright, but he wont be)

1st Pair: ?  Dahlin

2nd Pair: Clifton  Bryam

3rd Pair: Joker   Power

Bench: RJ and Rousek

Now sure, we can plug Skinner into the first line, Rosen, Savoie or Kulich into this line or that line and move Tuch up to this line or that and this and that. On D, move RJ up to 3rd pairing and blah blah. Problem is, that is not a winning team under this current coaching staff - or possibly most coaching staffs. It is a middling .500 club. 

Figuring out how to use Skinner is a key because he probably is not going anywhere. 

You missed Samuelsson. If he is there and R Johnson is in the rotation it makes Joker expendable.   We still need a big solid defensive defenseman in the top 4, I don't see that being Byram but that is who Adams brought in.   His contract will be of huge importance. 

At forward the hole left by Mitts is massive.  Cozens simply has to step up next year.  I will bet that they are counting on Cozens, Krebs and a prospect to emerge.   I prefer they bring in at least one solid veteran C.  

At wing they need a power forward and some muscle on the 3rd and 4th line.   

They are close.  Some of the young players will improve.  

Another key is if Levi can play effectively as a backup and play 30 games at a high level.  If he can, we should be good at goalie for a change.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Pimlach said:

Figuring out how to use Skinner is a key because he probably is not going anywhere. 

You missed Samuelsson. If he is there and R Johnson is in the rotation it makes Joker expendable.   We still need a big solid defensive defenseman in the top 4, I don't see that being Byram but that is who Adams brought in.   His contract will be of huge importance. 

At forward the hole left by Mitts is massive.  Cozens simply has to step up next year.  I will bet that they are counting on Cozens, Krebs and a prospect to emerge.   I prefer they bring in at least one solid veteran C.  

At wing they need a power forward and some muscle on the 3rd and 4th line.   

They are close.  Some of the young players will improve.  

Another key is if Levi can play effectively as a backup and play 30 games at a high level.  If he can, we should be good at goalie for a change.  

Wow...I did forget moose. Must've been subconscious due to flicking ligr in the ear over a hypothetical moose trade I don't really care about. 

Skinner is getting top 9 minutes at a minimum - probably top 6 minutes on this team - very sad, but the roster and his salary will make them (coaching/mngt) do it. I sincerely believe the answer is 3rd line minutes - with extended playing time when the team is down in the 3rd period. You only get 20 goals and 20 assists maximum out of that; but it is the best play for the team. 

The mitts trade is 'probably' going to haunt them the next couple years (assuming that move ends up being made in a vaccum). Bryam is fine - but they are way to deep at LHD AND way to deep with youthful forwards not NHL ready. At a minimum, one of the LHD's has to go to help fill out this roster. I really do not think people should be shocked if they hear rumors that they are trying to move Powers for a first line forward or top 6 center in the offseason. Probably won't happen - but I suspect rumors will come out on it. 

To the players and NHLPA's credit - no movement clauses are being widely used more than ever - and I do believe it is really impacting Adams ability to make a move. I am no apologist of Adams at this point - but he may very well be handcuffed with this current roster. 

 

Posted (edited)

Again I did not like this trade...MItts was the perfect 2nd center and every good team is built around strong centers. Skinner scores at a pace that this team desperately needs, and to do what they are doing with him now and basically misuse him is just another in the long line of mistakes this organization continues to make year after year. Heck, if we had kept the players we had over say the last eight years, we'd no doubt be in the playoffs with LIndy still coaching of course. 

Edited by sabrefanday1
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Pimlach said:

 

At wing they need a power forward and some muscle on the 3rd and 4th line.   

They are close.  Some of the young players will improve.  

Another key is if Levi can play effectively as a backup and play 30 games at a high level.  If he can, we should be good at goalie for a change.  

OMG. This is like Groundhog Day. I swear these exact sentiments were said same time last year. It has to become true at some point though, right?

Posted
1 minute ago, #freejame said:

At least we can all feel better about the front offices ability to evaluate talent. 

Let’s not get carried away.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, #freejame said:

Maybe a need to add an /s there. I’ve been doing a poor job of my sarcasm today. 

I got it. I was adding to it.

Posted
On 4/15/2024 at 12:53 PM, bob_sauve28 said:

 

Oof.  My thing on him - he's a fine middle 6 dude.  My issue is - even shooting at his best %... he does not score 20 goals. So either he passes up too many shots, or he can't shoot.  

Posted

So we need a Casey Mittelstadt. Fair enough, there were always two parts to that trade. But, let’s ask the question, if we had Casey, would one of our needs be a second pair left shot D with bad analytics?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/17/2024 at 3:27 PM, Thorny said:

So we need a Casey Mittelstadt. Fair enough, there were always two parts to that trade. But, let’s ask the question, if we had Casey, would one of our needs be a second pair left shot D with bad analytics?

And what will it cost to acquire the Mitts replacement in trade and how much will his cap hit be?  

PS: Mitts added 3 assists for the Avs last night.  

Posted

Is it just me, or has the board generally had a pretty dramatic swing from “we can afford to trade Mittelstadt” to “we have a giant Mittelstadt-sized hole on the roster”?

Maybe it was more gradual over the past year or so, as Cozens and Tage dropped off and Casey emerged?

From a depth perspective, I would be surprised if 1 or more of Krebs, Kulich, Östlund and Savoie doesn’t emerge as a decent 3C or better.

But I - and I think most of us - would be shocked if any are that this year.

It is my hope that Mitts is replaced not by another Mitts, but by a different kind of 3C: cheaper, edgier, more defensively focused.

With Lindy on board, I don’t think it’s a stretch to target a Gaustad or Hecht type of player.

  • Agree 1
Posted

I’m more interested in the Byram part of this equation.

How likely are we to see the dangerous Bo of the 1st few games over the majority of the season?

How likely are we to see the overmatched in his own zone Bo that finished the year?

What I saw over his brief stint here wasn’t overly impressive; it gave me Brandon Montour square peg vibes.

At the same time, I’ve seen this kid play at an elite level at the world juniors and in the Stanley Cup finals. He’s got a ton of talent and is a competitor.

Being moved from a Stanley Cup champion to a doormat, after a largely disappointing season playing in a less-than optimal role, dragging his girlfriend from Denver to Buffalo, having to switch to a zone defence after playing man his whole career, and having some kind of family issue playing out behind the scenes are real things.

There should be no issue with the roster fit. He can play on the left side in a top-4 role and add a transition and offensive weapon to augment skilled forwards, without hurting the team defensively. There’s room there and he has the skill set.

There’s a world where his addition cements the Sabres identity as a dangerous, quick-strike, ice-flipping team that kills you from the back end. But he has to get focused and aligned with his coaches. He has to shake off the past, step up and grab the opportunity.

He’s a guy who can be a difference-maker and someone I hope is a priority for Lindy and his staff.

  • Like (+1) 6
Posted
14 minutes ago, dudacek said:

I’m more interested in the Byram part of this equation.

How likely are we to see the dangerous Bo of the 1st few games over the majority of the season?

How likely are we to see the overmatched in his own zone Bo that finished the year?

What I saw over his brief stint here wasn’t overly impressive; it gave me Brandon Montour square peg vibes.

At the same time, I’ve seen this kid play at an elite level at the world juniors and in the Stanley Cup finals. He’s got a ton of talent and is a competitor.

Being moved from a Stanley Cup champion to a doormat, after a largely disappointing season playing in a less-than optimal role, dragging his girlfriend from Denver to Buffalo, having to switch to a zone defence after playing man his whole career, and having some kind of family issue playing out behind the scenes are real things.

There should be no issue with the roster fit. He can play on the left side in a top-4 role and add a transition and offensive weapon to augment skilled forwards, without hurting the team defensively. There’s room there and he has the skill set.

There’s a world where his addition cements the Sabres identity as a dangerous, quick-strike, ice-flipping team that kills you from the back end. But he has to get focused and aligned with his coaches. He has to shake off the past, step up and grab the opportunity.

He’s a guy who can be a difference-maker and someone I hope is a priority for Lindy and his staff.

Great point about how real life events have an impact on players’ lives. I’m convinced that having new infants definitely had an impact on Tuch and Tage this season. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I wouldn't want a Mitts, Gaustad or Hecht type player for the 3C next year. None of those players has the edge this team needs.

Edited by ...
Wrong number
  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...