Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, ... said:

I said:

"This is what happens when you hire milquetoast people who have never played in the NHL.

Meatballs will never understand what it takes to compete at the NHL or even AHL level because he's never experienced it."

Are those other coaches "milquetoast people"?

No. I singled out Meatballs.

You're bent out of shape over your strawman. Ira faxit stultitiam.

LMAO! Bent out of shape? Hardly. 

But I understand your need to now make your preceding “milquetoast” sentence the qualifier for your completely separate next sentence, which is the gist of everyone’s argument with you on the subject of playing experience being a requirement for success as a coach. 

So only milquetoast coaches need that NHL or AHL experience. Got it. But perhaps you can be clearer from the start next time instead of taking umbrage. 

And we can’t get enough of that pretentious use of Latin phraseology. We are so fortunate to be in your esteemed company. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, K-9 said:

LMAO! Bent out of shape? Hardly. 

But I understand your need to now make your preceding “milquetoast” sentence the qualifier for your completely separate next sentence, which is the gist of everyone’s argument with you on the subject of playing experience being a requirement for success as a coach. 

So only milquetoast coaches need that NHL or AHL experience. Got it. But perhaps you can be clearer from the start next time instead of taking umbrage. 

And we can’t get enough of that pretentious use of Latin phraseology. We are so fortunate to be in your esteemed company. 

You desperately need a hug.

Posted
5 hours ago, ... said:

I've answered these attempts to level the field several times already. I am speaking about Granato.

These other people figured it out by having the personal attributes that allowed them to figure it out. Granato is no match for Bowman's acumen. Not smart enough, not creative enough. Granato has shown absolutely no progress or aptitude as a NHL coach beyond what we have already seen.

You're speaking about Granato and stressing that he's patently unqualified because he's never played in the NHL.  The greatest coach in history never played in the NHL.  Just admit that not playing in the NHL is not a disqualification as a coach.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

You're speaking about Granato and stressing that he's patently unqualified because he's never played in the NHL.  The greatest coach in history never played in the NHL.  Just admit that not playing in the NHL is not a disqualification as a coach.

Something… something…MILQUETOAST!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Doohickie said:

You're speaking about Granato and stressing that he's patently unqualified because he's never played in the NHL.  The greatest coach in history never played in the NHL.  Just admit that not playing in the NHL is not a disqualification as a coach.

Why would I do that? I never made that claim. You're just following a rabid few here who put their knee-jerk reaction ahead of reason and are now trying to bully me into justifying incompetent reading and thinking.

A cop once pulled me over and tried to get me to admit I wasn't wearing my seat belt when in fact I was. I just unbuckled it to reach into the glove box and retrieve my registration in an effort to be a nice, compliant citizen.  What he really pulled me over for, which he'd never admit, was prior to that I didn't let him go through a four way stop first even though he clearly stopped after I did.

Edited by ...
Auto complete socks
Posted
23 minutes ago, ... said:

Why would I do that? I never made that claim. You're just following a rabid few here who put their knee-jerk reaction ahead of reason and are now trying to bully me into justifying incompetent reading and thinking.

A cop once pulled me over and tried to get me to admit I wasn't wearing my seat belt when in fact I was. I just unbuckled it to reach into the glove box and retrieve my registration in an effort to be a nice, compliant citizen.  What he really pulled me over for, which he'd never admit, was prior to that I didn't let him go through a four way stop first even though he clearly stopped after I did.


Sure sounds like you made that claim:

Quote

Meatballs will never understand what it takes to compete at the NHL or even AHL level because he's never experienced it.

But yeah, let’s qualify that stand alone sentence with another stand alone sentence, from a different paragraph entirely, just to avoid having to admit that you didn’t say something in the first place. It would have been easier just to apologize for not making yourself clear in the first place. 

Is there a Latin phrase for “intellectual dishonesty?” 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, K-9 said:


Sure sounds like you made that claim:

But yeah, let’s qualify that stand alone sentence with another stand alone sentence, from a different paragraph entirely, just to avoid having to admit that you didn’t say something in the first place. It would have been easier just to apologize for not making yourself clear in the first place. 

Is there a Latin phrase for “intellectual dishonesty?” 

You're being very childish.

The subject of the sentence you are quoting is Meatballs. You're taking a specific reference and arbitrarily broadening it to create a strawman.

You should really just let this go. If I'm in the wrong it will reflect on me. However, whatever little victory you're trying to gain is making you look like a 12-year-old school hooligan. 

Just now, Doohickie said:

A shooting gallery on this PP.  Keep going guys.

Wrong thread you are in.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ... said:

You're being very childish.

No, you are.  We're responding to the literal words you wrote and you're trying to maintain you didn't say them.  Or that's not what you meant.  Or something....

Posted
6 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

No, you are.  We're responding to the literal words you wrote and you're trying to maintain you didn't say them.  Or that's not what you meant.  Or something....

Okay, then block me or something. Jumping Christmas.

Posted
6 minutes ago, ... said:

You're being very childish.

The subject of the sentence you are quoting is Meatballs. You're taking a specific reference and arbitrarily broadening it to create a strawman.

You should really just let this go. If I'm in the wrong it will reflect on me. However, whatever little victory you're trying to gain is making you look like a 12-year-old school hooligan. 

Wrong thread you are in.

You just can’t do it, can you? Instead you’re the victim of “bullying” and “hooliganism” and have to resort to insults as a defense mechanism. 

You are in the wrong and it does reflect on you. A little humility might help in the future. 

I will now “just let this go.” 

Posted
Just now, ... said:

Okay, then block me or something. Jumping Christmas.

Naw.  I actually like most of what you post; just disagree in this case.

It's all good.  🍻

Posted
2 minutes ago, K-9 said:

You just can’t do it, can you? Instead you’re the victim of “bullying” and “hooliganism” and have to resort to insults as a defense mechanism. 

You are in the wrong and it does reflect on you. A little humility might help in the future. 

I will now “just let this go.” 

Neither of those words were used as insults but rather as descriptions. 

Posted

You guys are arguing with someone who thinks professional athletes are modern day slaves. You can't argue with someone like that. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
41 minutes ago, Porous Five Hole said:

Since the trade, Casey is 4G 3A in 11 GP, +3. Not much press on him to share since the trade, but Aves 8-3 in last 11 GP. Seems he’s fitting in nicely.  

Thats great man can you tell me how MacKinnon is doing too 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • dislike 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, TageMVP said:

Thats great man can you tell me how MacKinnon is doing too 

I thought it would be interesting to review how old friends have performed since the trades have been made. You can keep scrolling if you’re uninterested. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Porous Five Hole said:

I thought it would be interesting to review how old friends have performed since the trades have been made. You can keep scrolling if you’re uninterested. 

It is interesting. Comparing how players produce and perform with different systems and linemates might offer perspective on what configuration could work going forward. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Porous Five Hole said:

I thought it would be interesting to review how old friends have performed since the trades have been made. You can keep scrolling if you’re uninterested. 

With the Sabres he was .76 PPG this season, with the Avs he's .64 PPG.  Bust!

Edited by Doohickie
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Bo knows hockey

In his last 11 games he has 0 goals, 1 assist and is -6.  I guess the Sabres no accountability culture has already won him over. 

Edited by GASabresIUFAN
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Bo knows hockey

In his last 11 games he has 0 goals, 1 assist and is -6.  I guess the Sabres no accountability culture has already won him over. 

Normally I would not take this to seriously but you see it when you watch him. 

He stopped all the energy and the on ice banter.  He rotates in and out, plays a soft style of defense, and stopped creating chances. 

He has become like Joker but with a ring and a higher pedigree.  

I am gonna be really interested in what Adams offers to pay this guy over the veteran 2C that he discarded.   

Cant wait to see what 2C he brings in because Cozens is looking like a 3C and Krebs is not the guy right now.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

Normally I would not take this to seriously but you see it when you watch him. 

He stopped all the energy and the on ice banter.  He rotates in and out, plays a soft style of defense, and stopped creating chances. 

He has become like Joker but with a ring and a higher pedigree.  

I am gonna be really interested in what Adams offers to pay this guy over the veteran 2C that he discarded.   

Cant wait to see what 2C he brings in because Cozens is looking like a 3C and Krebs is not the guy right now.  

couldnt agree with you more...our first line is probably best served as a second line on a contending team. as of now, this is what the team realistically looks like from a 'holes' perspective (imo):

1st Line: Peterka   ?   ?

2nd Line: ?   Tage   Tuch

3rd Line: Benson  Cozens  Quinn

4th Line:  Greenway  Krebs  Skinner (i know, i know - prefer he is gone outright, but he wont be)

1st Pair: ?  Dahlin

2nd Pair: Clifton  Bryam

3rd Pair: Joker   Power

Bench: RJ and Rousek

Now sure, we can plug Skinner into the first line, Rosen, Savoie or Kulich into this line or that line and move Tuch up to this line or that and this and that. On D, move RJ up to 3rd pairing and blah blah. Problem is, that is not a winning team under this current coaching staff - or possibly most coaching staffs. It is a middling .500 club. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...