Sabres Fan in NS Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 It's going to be a very long summer. Sheesh. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 5 hours ago, ... said: At least with Byram we are ostensibly filling a dire need which Mitts did not especially with Krebs and other forwards somewhere in the system. I suspect someone else on the D who may take up too much cap room will be gone in order to make room for Byram - if Byram works out. Quick math, but for 2024-25, assuming we retain everyone we have left for approximately the same cap hit, we'll be spending $31,633,333 on the D. If Byram is to stay, while I bet he'll want Dahlin money, let's say he takes $10m/yr for X years. For 2025-26, assuming everything and everyone stay the same (yes, I know they won't), the cap hit for the D would be $37,783,343. Is that too much for a D corp? idk, there are some who believe the cap is going to rise a lot in the next few years so maybe. Is there a team with 30 million for their top 3 D? It seems like too much. Two guys like that yes, three seems unlikely. There's no question he makes the D better but unlike you (and KA) I do not think much of Krebs and think that we now have a new hole to fill. If they think the plan is just to slap Savoie or some other kid in there I don't think it will go well. We need a veteran 3C replacement. Quote
... Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 6 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: There's no question he makes the D better but unlike you (and KA) I do not think much of Krebs and think that we now have a new hole to fill. If they think the plan is just to slap Savoie or some other kid in there I don't think it will go well. We need a veteran 3C replacement. Now hang on there, Hoss. I am only relating the reality of the situation without any particular analysis. Quote
Pimlach Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 16 hours ago, SabreFinn said: I still do not for a second believe that Adams has plans on extending Byram. He gives him first pair minutes and a possibility to show what he really is capabel of and trade him when his price is high, probably for a cheaper solid RHD and 2 nd. At least I would do so. Or he trades Power. 1 1 Quote
... Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 7 minutes ago, Pimlach said: Or he trades Power. 1 2 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 hour ago, ... said: Now hang on there, Hoss. I am only relating the reality of the situation without any particular analysis. Oh okay, I thought you were saying Krebs could take the spot adequately. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 I will admit that Byram has played his tushy off since arriving in Buffalo. His aggressive style is helping activate the entire D group. His excellent play also makes you wonder about Power. Krebs stepping in for Casey is a joke. Downgrading from Casey to Krebs has created a Grand Canyon size hole in the forward group. Even with the bombardment in the 1st two periods tonight, most of the playmaking was creating by Byram and Dahlin. 3 of the 7 goals were by D again tonight. 2 of the forwards goals were unassisted after great plays by Tuch and JJP. 1 1 Quote
Turbo44 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I will admit that Byram has played his tushy off since arriving in Buffalo. His aggressive style is helping activate the entire D group. His excellent play also makes you wonder about Power. Krebs stepping in for Casey is a joke. Downgrading from Casey to Krebs has created a Grand Canyon size hole in the forward group. Even with the bombardment in the 1st two periods tonight, most of the playmaking was creating by Byram and Dahlin. 3 of the 7 goals were by D again tonight. 2 of the forwards goals were unassisted after great plays by Tuch and JJP. Krebs isn’t the answer at 3c. It are you really complaining that we only scored 4 goals by forward and 7 overall? Can’t we enjoy a blowout? 1 1 Quote
Believer Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 hour ago, Pimlach said: Or he trades Power. Bingo. Quote
RochesterExpat Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 (edited) I think everyone is overthinking this because everyone wants him to extend 7-8 years, but I fully expect him to get bridged into free agency on a lower AAV (7.5-8) for three years and it wouldn’t surprise me if GMKA and his agent already have a handshake deal in place that gets signed this summer. Like many, I’ve been vocal about GMKA being too conservative or taking too long to make decisions. I can’t imagine GMKA suddenly departing from that behavior and making a knee jerk trade without doing an absolutely excessive amount of due diligence. The trade was “leaked” 2-3 weeks before the deadline when Mitts was linked to Colorado and Byram was linked to Buffalo. I took that with a grain of salt like most trade news, but this wasn’t a quickly done trade by any means. The Sabres (and his agent) will dangle the expected cap increases of the next few years in front of him if he takes the free agency bridge deal. It’ll also be sold as 3 years of guaranteed money given his injury history—something he might not get in arbitration—and an opportunity to play with Dahlin on a top D pairing before hitting free agency. At the time the contract ends, Buffalo will move assets (i.e. Power/Sammy) to keep him if the value is there and it makes sense. Basically Buffalo wants to see if it’s a value add to Dahlin. If not, he’ll be a trade piece or he’ll just simply walk to free agency after having spent 4 seasons and change in Buffalo. As for the “kicking the can down the road” argument because we traded Mitts’ contract for Bo’s, I agree in principle, but it’s somewhat of a flawed comparison. Mitts was going to end up a very expensive 3C in the organization because GMKA already hitched his wagon to Cozens and Tage (we can debate this all day but it’s the situation nonetheless). Unloading Mitts for Byram filled a role (Dahlin’s partner) that makes more sense to spend cap on than overpaying for a 3C. There is a reason why Matthews/MacKinnon/McDavid in this league have (expensive) supporting players. How long did we go with Dahlin - Joki? Sammy has done fine with Dahlin—at least when healthy—but is anyone really happy with it? Fine isn’t good enough. Getting out of this endless cycle starts with getting the superstar Swede a serious partner. Edited March 13 by RochesterExpat 7 1 Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 9 minutes ago, Turbo44 said: Krebs isn’t the answer at 3c. It are you really complaining that we only scored 4 goals by forward and 7 overall? Can’t we enjoy a blowout? I loved the blow out. It was the best first 40 minutes the team played this season. However, no one can watch that forward group and be happy with their play overall. Tonight Greenway and Benson were excellent. Tuch had a good game. However, these forwards as a group have an incredibly hard time creating offense this season. KA is going to need to invest in a couple of centers, but I don't think he has it in him. Quote
pi2000 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 2 hours ago, Pimlach said: Or he trades Power. 2 2 Quote
IKnowPhysics Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 Sabres playoff chances: Bowen Byram showing up at the deadline: 7 Quote
WhenWillItEnd66 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 Ok, i flipped when i saw the trade, but damn it seems to be working out very good for both teams so far. I know small sample size, but definitely gives us a very dangerous top pair. 1 Quote
Doohicksie Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 Casey scored his first for the Avs last night. 1 Quote
bob_sauve28 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 Power has really improved of late. This trade has seemed to have had the indirect and unexpected upside in putting a burr under Power's saddle. The Great Triumvirate of Dalhlin, Power and Byram will carry this team forward! 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 18 minutes ago, bob_sauve28 said: Power has really improved of late. This trade has seemed to have had the indirect and unexpected upside in putting a burr under Power's saddle. The Great Triumvirate of Dalhlin, Power and Byram will carry this team forward! I thought Power looked good after he returned from injury, until last night. However, I thought he played afraid last night. He has no physical aspect to his game. None. Not only does he not hit, but he avoids being hit and he plays with his stick way too much. Two goals were on him. He was right there when Fisher purposely jumped on UPL and he did nothing. So what happens, they jump UPL again The Wings were begging for it last night Yeah, Power is only 21. Byram is only 22. Dahlin is only 23. If Bryam has a huge year next season is Adams going to pay him or trade him? Mitts was moved in part because of salary planning. All Adams did was kick that can down the road for one year. 1 1 1 Quote
Believer Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 1 minute ago, Pimlach said: I thought Power looked good after he returned from injury, until last night. However, I thought he played afraid last night. He has no physical aspect to his game. None. Not only does he not hit, but he avoids being hit and he plays with his stick way too much. Two goals were on him. He was right there when Fisher purposely jumped on UPL and he did nothing. So what happens, they jump UPL again The Wings were begging for it last night Yeah, Power is only 21. Byram is only 22. Dahlin is only 23. If Bryam has a huge year next season is Adams going to pay him or trade him? Mitts was moved in part because of salary planning. All Adams did was kick that can down the road for one year. I saw what you saw @Pimlach… Could not believe Power let UPL get run over right in front of him with no response… Power is overrated, overhyped, and overpaid… If Byram continues to develop his two-way game, Power can be traded while he still has high first round value… Give me an all-pro late 20’s RHD who can skate with heavy presence and grit… Even up. 2 1 Quote
JohnC Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 17 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: He was, and he was likely not going to fit into their cap projections/decisions but getting rid of one problem with another problem isn't really a good plan. We are just kicking the can down the road. What can are we kicking down the road? There is an irony that you complain that we are not talented enough, and then complain that when you do get more talent that it is too burdensome to keep. You seem to be the type of guy who complains when getting up and then complains when going to bed. Sheeeeeesh! 9 hours ago, Pimlach said: Or he trades Power. Why in the world would the GM trade Power? What he has done over the past few years is assemble enough talent (still young) to put together a top tier blueline. On top of that, that unit now has sufficient depth to absorb injuries. Our young goalie is playing at a surprisingly high-end level. He is currently supported by a young group of blueliners who are playing in front of him. Why would he trade a goalie like Power who is steadily getting better and will become one of the better defenders in the league. I just don't understand the logic of assembling a roster with the desire to then disassemble it. All teams have to wrestle with the cap. It's a challenge to do. The advantage that our GM has is that he has locked up his top talent sooner to get a discount rate. (For some, not you, he is criticized for it.) Because of these early signings he will have a little more room to maneuver when forced to decide who he can keep, and who he will be forced to move. I agree with you that at some point the will have to decide who to move out and who to bring in. But that's the cap conundrum that all teams have to wrestle with. I'm confident that Power won't be one of the players who will be moved because he will be one of our anchor/essential players that we will keep for a long time. 3 Quote
Doohicksie Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, Believer said: Power is overrated, overhyped, and overpaid… The hype machine is bigger than the Sabres org. I watched the second two periods on the Red Wings coverage last night and they had nothing but praise for the guy. They see his potential, and he's a pretty good player already. His Corsi For is 51.9%; that's pretty good. I think the negative view of Power is fueled by the fact that people want to see the finished product now but Power is still on the development curve. 1 1 Quote
JohnC Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 32 minutes ago, Pimlach said: I thought Power looked good after he returned from injury, until last night. However, I thought he played afraid last night. He has no physical aspect to his game. None. Not only does he not hit, but he avoids being hit and he plays with his stick way too much. Two goals were on him. He was right there when Fisher purposely jumped on UPL and he did nothing. So what happens, they jump UPL again The Wings were begging for it last night Yeah, Power is only 21. Byram is only 22. Dahlin is only 23. If Bryam has a huge year next season is Adams going to pay him or trade him? Mitts was moved in part because of salary planning. All Adams did was kick that can down the road for one year. I have a different view on Power and his style of play. You are absolutely right that he is not a banger. However, too many people get caught up with his humongous size and make the assumption that it should translate into a more physical style of play. That's not his game and will never be his game. He is a smart player (for his experience level) who is for the most part good at positioning. He's not the type of player who is going to knock a lot of players out of position. This big guy can skate and he is steadily widening his game on offense. I politely recommend that you wait a little longer before making a judgment on him. In my opinion, he is going to be a gem. 2 Quote
nfreeman Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 30 minutes ago, Pimlach said: I thought Power looked good after he returned from injury, until last night. However, I thought he played afraid last night. He has no physical aspect to his game. None. Not only does he not hit, but he avoids being hit and he plays with his stick way too much. Two goals were on him. He was right there when Fisher purposely jumped on UPL and he did nothing. So what happens, they jump UPL again The Wings were begging for it last night Yeah, Power is only 21. Byram is only 22. Dahlin is only 23. If Bryam has a huge year next season is Adams going to pay him or trade him? Mitts was moved in part because of salary planning. All Adams did was kick that can down the road for one year. I agree with the concerns on Power. At some point I'd sure like them to find him a partner with some edge to his game, because Power doesn't seem to have it in his nature. Having said that, I am pretty far from feeling like Power is a bust or that they will need to trade him. He's a very young player with a very high hockey IQ IMHO and he'll improve every year. I kinda disagree with the bolded. While I think money did play a role, I think KA's bottom line was that Mitts, although a good player whom KA would've been happy to keep at the right price, simply wasn't worth what it would have cost to keep him. I also think there will be cap room to keep Dahlin, Power and Byram around long term if their play warrants it -- and that KA thinks their play will warrant it and is planning to keep all 3. 1 Quote
matter2003 Posted March 13 Report Posted March 13 42 minutes ago, Pimlach said: I thought Power looked good after he returned from injury, until last night. However, I thought he played afraid last night. He has no physical aspect to his game. None. Not only does he not hit, but he avoids being hit and he plays with his stick way too much. Two goals were on him. He was right there when Fisher purposely jumped on UPL and he did nothing. So what happens, they jump UPL again The Wings were begging for it last night Yeah, Power is only 21. Byram is only 22. Dahlin is only 23. If Bryam has a huge year next season is Adams going to pay him or trade him? Mitts was moved in part because of salary planning. All Adams did was kick that can down the road for one year. Neither does Erik Karlsson. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.