Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, JujuFish said:

I really hope we don't get so conservative on both sides of the ball against KC like we did in the second half against Baltimore.

They didn't do that the last time they played each other, so no reason to think they would.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Doohicksie said:

I think it will add into the argument about when to go for 2 and when to just kick the 1.

For me, it’s never been an argument. You only ever go for two if you need it to tie at the end of the game. I said it that day.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, SwampD said:

For me, it’s never been an argument. You only ever go for two if you need it to tie at the end of the game. I said it that day.

I also don't like calling an 8-point lead a "one score" margin.  You have to make the touchdown, plus you have to score again on a 2-point conversion.  In the NFL this season 69% of 2-point conversions failed.  By your reckoning, with a lot of time left in the game, the 1-point conversion is the better deal.

Out of curiosity, I wonder of McClappy would have attempted that first 2-point conversion in that game situation?

  • Agree 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Doohicksie said:

I think in the Baltimore game it was the right call.  Don't do anything too flashy; prevent turnovers by the offense.  Try not to give up too much, to fast, on defense.

Even if the Ravens tied it with the 2-point conversion, I think the Bills win on a field goal in regulation.  The Bills didn't excel, but neither did they make a big mistake that could have turned the game (like the Ravens did, with three turnovers).

You say right call, I say nearly cost them everything.

Posted
1 minute ago, JujuFish said:

You say right call, I say nearly cost them everything.

But it didn't.  It was pretty bad conditions, the Bills were sitting on a lead, and it was incumbent on Baltimore to make something happen.  The Bills chewed up enough clock on offense and got the field goals to make it tough on the Ravens' comeback attempt.  The defense bent but didn't break.  Had Baltimore converted the 2 points at the end, the Bills would have had 1:33 to get to field goal range (about 40 yards) in regulation and they still had timeouts.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Tuesday morning and I am already nervous. 

Most teams don't get many opportunities, this next game feels so much bigger than a football game to me.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Doohicksie said:

I think it will add into the argument about when to go for 2 and when to just kick the 1.

It does. Interestingly, when I search about this a minute ago it appears that teams are struggling with them this year (around 30% compared to 55% last year), but finding a good list of succeeded vs attempted is surprisingly hard so it's hard to tell. In any case, in the longer term even if 2pt makes sense, when it's just a bit over 50% a string of a few misses and you've given away a field goal. Attempting one in the 3rd quarter wasn't a particular good idea, even more so when the Ravens' season record was apparently 1/4.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pimlach said:

Tuesday morning and I am already nervous. 

Most teams don't get many opportunities, this next game feels so much bigger than a football game to me.  

I’m not getting my hopes up. The NFL has 3 hundred million reasons to make sure the KC Swifties win.

This game would have been in Orchard Park but for those reasons.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Night Train said:

 No anxiety from me going into this KC game, I was somewhat surprised they got past Baltimore.

 Allen should just play loose and score. Bills won't shut down Mahomes on D.  

The Bills should throw everything at them.  No holds barred.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, Night Train said:

Bills won't shut down Mahomes on D.

Oh, I think they will.  We've seen some varying approaches on D, depending on opponent.  I think they'll get to Mahommes, whether that means actually sacking him or throwing confusing coverage looks his way.

McClappy coached a masterful game against Baltimore.  Despite being outgained, the Bills beat the Ravens on time of possession, penalties and turnovers.  I think he can do it against KC.  The Bills are loose, but they're also pretty well disciplined.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

The Bills should throw everything at them.  No holds barred.  

I think they will try to confuse Mahommes on defense; a lot of coverage fakes and stuff.  Make him change the play, then adjust the defense to that change.  The defense is reasonably good at that; just need to turn it up to 11.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Doohicksie said:

But it didn't.  It was pretty bad conditions, the Bills were sitting on a lead, and it was incumbent on Baltimore to make something happen.  The Bills chewed up enough clock on offense and got the field goals to make it tough on the Ravens' comeback attempt.  The defense bent but didn't break.  Had Baltimore converted the 2 points at the end, the Bills would have had 1:33 to get to field goal range (about 40 yards) in regulation and they still had timeouts.

That Baltimore owns two of the biggest threat rushing options in the NFL and decided not to use either of them for those conversions is mind boggling. In fact, the Ravens lack of use for Derrick Henry is still blowing my mind. This is a team where all I heard was about how BIG they are and they have Henry who is absolute kryptonite to the Bills defense and yet they refused to ride him.  They gave up on him far too soon. If they had adopted a ground pound offense they would have broken down the Bills D.  Oh well.

I'm not even worrying about Sunday. It will be what it is. Thankfully I've learned to not worry about that which I cannot control.  It took me far too long in my younger years and those years were full of health issues... but no longer!

That said.. I'd like them to win it all.. that goes without saying. People of Buffalo, those in the city and those who identify as Buffalonians regardless of their geographic location are far overdue for a massive does of "Hell yeah."

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

A medium-grade concern of mine is if Rapp can't go and Bishop takes his place. I view Rapp as an average safety and certainly not irreplaceable. But Andy Reid does to rookie safeties what McD does to rookie QB's. 

Posted
1 hour ago, SwampD said:

I’m not getting my hopes up. The NFL has 3 hundred million reasons to make sure the KC Swifties win.

This game would have been in Orchard Park but for those reasons.

Swifties...that is a classic

Posted
2 hours ago, Doohicksie said:

Oh, I think they will.  We've seen some varying approaches on D, depending on opponent.  I think they'll get to Mahommes, whether that means actually sacking him or throwing confusing coverage looks his way.

McClappy coached a masterful game against Baltimore.  Despite being outgained, the Bills beat the Ravens on time of possession, penalties and turnovers.  I think he can do it against KC.  The Bills are loose, but they're also pretty well disciplined.

And it’s not like KC is a massive point producer. Their top score was 30 points, which they did twice. I’m too lazy to look and see if any of those points were from the defense. 
 

The Bills scored 199 more points than them… and that includes both teams sitting out week 18. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, LTS said:

That Baltimore owns two of the biggest threat rushing options in the NFL and decided not to use either of them for those conversions is mind boggling. In fact, the Ravens lack of use for Derrick Henry is still blowing my mind. This is a team where all I heard was about how BIG they are and they have Henry who is absolute kryptonite to the Bills defense and yet they refused to ride him.  They gave up on him far too soon. If they had adopted a ground pound offense they would have broken down the Bills D.  Oh well.

I'm not even worrying about Sunday. It will be what it is. Thankfully I've learned to not worry about that which I cannot control.  It took me far too long in my younger years and those years were full of health issues... but no longer!

That said.. I'd like them to win it all.. that goes without saying. People of Buffalo, those in the city and those who identify as Buffalonians regardless of their geographic location are far overdue for a massive does of "Hell yeah."

I heard reports that Derrick Henry is not as effective in cold/snowy conditions.

Posted
5 minutes ago, inkman said:

Not if you like things that are funny 

Congrats on being named Arbiter of All Things Funny. 

Some of us need Palm Trees and Swifties to get through the day.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Doohicksie said:

I also don't like calling an 8-point lead a "one score" margin.  You have to make the touchdown, plus you have to score again on a 2-point conversion.  In the NFL this season 69% of 2-point conversions failed.  By your reckoning, with a lot of time left in the game, the 1-point conversion is the better deal.

Out of curiosity, I wonder of McClappy would have attempted that first 2-point conversion in that game situation?

In that case, you can’t call a 7 point lead a “one score” margin, either. But I get what you’re saying and that’s why I like to refer to the number of possessions instead. For instance, an eight point lead is a one possession game, etc. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Stoner said:

Congrats on being named Arbiter of All Things Funny. 

Some of us need Palm Trees and Swifties to get through the day.

Sometimes my inner mudge escapes 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...