Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, French Collection said:

Solid defensive effort without Power and Mule, whoda thunk it.

Have you seen our record with Bryson in the lineup this year? He’s the NEW Mule 

I actually think we’re undefeated 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, French Collection said:

Solid defensive effort without Power and Mule, whoda thunk it.

Tells you something…

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Thorny said:

Have you seen our record with Bryson in the lineup this year? He’s the NEW Mule 

I actually think we’re undefeated 

Very small sample size but interesting.

I still don’t want him in a top six role on a regular basis.

Posted
22 minutes ago, ska-T Chitown said:

The only problem is games like this trigger my inner reptile brain or whatever to think "this is it. this is the game that starts the run." When every other ounce of my person knows this is just not the case ...

If, IF this was the start of a 10 game winning streak...after those 10 wins in a row the Sabres would have 68 points in 61 games.  or 55.7% of available points.  Currently 55.7 is 8th in the conference. A 10 game win streak probably STILL has them outside of the playoffs.

  • Sad 1
Posted

Greenway… Boom…

Boys were buzzin’

Posted
1 minute ago, mjd1001 said:

Clifton with already over 18 minute of ice time. He is going to end up with 22 or 23 minutes this tame at this rate.

I have to admit the Dmen have been good, moving the puck with good decisions. I don’t miss Power trying to shield the puck with his body on the wall while the other team overwhelms him into a turnover.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Thorny said:

I mea n, ya. The output of the goaltending was poor to below average for the first half of the season. I didn’t create the stats  

😂 Ooh boy. You among many were pretty down on UPL and you were ready to jettison him. And you're going to dock points because UPL wasn't perfect from the get go???

Posted
5 minutes ago, French Collection said:

Very small sample size but interesting.

I still don’t want him in a top six role on a regular basis.

Oh of course not. I just meant it as proof of correlation not being causation that’s all 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...