Thorner Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 They hit 4 posts this period and we have a PP now or never Quote
ExWNYer Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Yikes. Greenway might be minus a few chiclets. Quote
Scottysabres Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, Crusader1969 said: 7th highest scoring team in the league at 5v5. They are a plus 6 on the season I agree they mirror their coach ... timid and way too nice BUT it's the special teams that has them 10 points and counting out of a playoff spot You shouldn't have to rely on special teams to win more games than they have. Yes it is a factor, but the win/lose record is an indicator of a much larger issue than merely special teams. 1 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Hey! A double-minor powerplay to close out the game. Two PP goals for the win? Quote
inkman Posted February 10 Author Report Posted February 10 How does a 6’6” player have his face 2 feet off the ice? Quote
Crusader1969 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 minute ago, Thorny said: I'm not sure what point that makes. Reinhart is one of the top scorers in the league. Sabres would desperately love to have him on their team right now Eichel was the top line centre on a cup winner Im not going to even consider mitts, or any other guy drafted around 8 with Celebrini If you are drafting 8th. Sure please trade. If you can trade with lottery protection, then please trade it. Quote
French Collection Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, Thorny said: They hit 4 posts this period and we have a PP now or never Loser point plus on a silver platter, why am I worried. Quote
DarthEbriate Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 (edited) Reviewing if Greenway was too far bent forward. Edited February 10 by DarthEbriate Quote
Thorner Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, Scottysabres said: You shouldn't have to rely on special teams to win more games than they have. Yes it is a factor, but the win/lose record is an indicator of a much larger issue than merely special teams. Plus, guess what, last I checked, PLAYERS ALSO PLAY DEFENCE AT 5 V 5! How’s our goal differential? Quote
Scottysabres Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, DarthEbriate said: Hey! A double-minor powerplay to close out the game. Two PP goals for the win? 🤣 No penalty Quote
Thorner Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 (edited) 1 minute ago, Crusader1969 said: I'm not sure what point that makes. Reinhart is one of the top scorers in the league. Sabres would desperately love to have him on their team right now Eichel was the top line centre on a cup winner Im not going to even consider mitts, or any other guy drafted around 8 with Celebrini If you are drafting 8th. Sure please trade. If you can trade with lottery protection, then please trade it. You are making my point; it’s not about the player, it’s about the time frame. It’s about the build we do not need this guy at this time we don’t need good prospects right now Edited February 10 by Thorny Quote
Crusader1969 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, Scottysabres said: You shouldn't have to rely on special teams to win more games than they have. Yes it is a factor, but the win/lose record is an indicator of a much larger issue than merely special teams. They are a positive team 5v5. I'm not sure what you are saying. The PP has killed them this year. If they were avg on the PP, they'd be in the hunt Quote
DarthEbriate Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Nice. We don't have to worry about seeing a SHG to close out the game. 2 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 minute ago, Thorny said: Plus, guess what, last I checked, PLAYERS ALSO PLAY DEFENCE AT 5 V 5! How’s our goal differential? Plus 6 Quote
Doohicksie Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 No, not really a good call: The StL player double hit Greenway; second was above the waist. Quote
Carmel Corn Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 With this powerplay, maybe it's a good thing it's not a penalty 1 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 minute ago, Thorny said: You are making my point; it’s not about the player, it’s about the time frame. It’s about the build we do not need this guy at this time Good news. Celebrini is Pro ready. Quote
Pimlach Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Wow. That is unusual. It looks waist high from one angle. Not from the other. We don’t have enough fans to chant “ref you suck” or “let’s go Buffalo “. sad Quote
Thorner Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, Crusader1969 said: Plus 6 So not nearly good enough Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.