CallawaySabres Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 They need a five game losing streak to get this coach and GM out of here to start rebuilding. 2 3 Quote
Believer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Great effortโฆ Crap resultโฆ Entertaining game for fans. 4 1 Quote
GoPuckYourself Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Can't ever close the deal, so many missed shots and rarely anyone standing in front of the goalie, same theme just a different night but at the very least they kept it respectable. 1 minute ago, CallawaySabres said: They need a five game losing streak to get this coach and GM out of here to start rebuilding. I dont think they would to be honest. We already need a miracle run to even make it so what would we need to wait for?ย 2 Quote
Pimlach Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Tough loss. ย They played the way they should. ย Much more effort ย Still started slow again and fell behind.ย ย They can do more.ย 3 Quote
SABRESfan Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 minute ago, GoPuckYourself said: Can't ever close the deal, so many missed shots and rarely anyone standing in front of the goalie, same theme just a different night but at the very least they kept it respectable. I dont think they would to be honest. We already need a miracle run to even make it so what would we need to wait for?ย Letโs say they make it.. and obviously lose in the first round. ย Who would feel better about the season? Quote
KC Scouts Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Enough with the "great effort BS" WE LOST, WE LOST.....ONCE AGAIN.....WE LOST ย 4 3 2 Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 I don't know the stats off hand, but they're jsut terrible when they give up the first goal. Even if they play well. I've never seen a team be so freaking bad when down 1 goal. Quote
GoPuckYourself Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 3 minutes ago, SABRESfan said: Letโs say they make it.. and obviously lose in the first round. ย Who would feel better about the season? Who would feel better? Everyone would. 2 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 minute ago, SABRESfan said: Letโs say they make it.. and obviously lose in the first round. ย Who would feel better about the season? ย Meย Quote
SDS Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 3 minutes ago, Wyldnwoody44 said: I don't know the stats off hand, but they're jsut terrible when they give up the first goal. Even if they play well. I've never seen a team be so freaking bad when down 1 goal. I guess you can say itโs bad when you donโt score. Itโs hard to say they were freaking bad that game IMO.ย Quote
FrenchConnection44 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Played really well tonight. But good goaltending and we just donโt have shooters. That opportunity by Casey off the Tage pass should have been put away. Our shots are neither accurate nor ย hard for most of the team.ย 1 Quote
thewookie1 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 How is it that we score maybe one lucky goal a season whereas at least 20+ go in on us? We made Dallas look bad and yet we still lost because of their damn goalie. We should of ran the bastard, play dirty its not like the refs are going to cut you any slack. WTF was both those 5v3 penalties? Felt like the fix was in with that Clifton penalty especially; on the PK how many times have we seen Sabres take blatant crosschecks with no call. Benson got literally dumped twice in the 1sst in front of the net with the puck nowhere near him and they weren't "I'm stronger and taller" falls; they were crosscheck style falls. This year has been a freaking test in anger management; the Sabres have bad games where you're angry and then you have games like these where they play great and yet lose anyway. 1 Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 3 minutes ago, SDS said: I guess you can say itโs bad when you donโt score. Itโs hard to say they were freaking bad that game IMO.ย I had the pleasure of listening on the radio as I'm driving up to Watertown, so I didn't get to see how they looked. A loss is a loss at this point. This effort with a loss would probably be better tolerated if they weren't such a wreck as a team.ย 1 2 Quote
KC Scouts Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, Wyldnwoody44 said: I had the pleasure of listening on the radio as I'm driving up to Watertown, so I didn't get to see how they looked. A loss is a loss at this point. This effort with a loss would probably be better tolerated if they weren't such a wreck as a team.ย Absolutely......we shouldn't use the "But we played really well" cliche If you are 14th place in the conference and were expected to make the playoffs. ย 1 Quote
SDS Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, Wyldnwoody44 said: I had the pleasure of listening on the radio as I'm driving up to Watertown, so I didn't get to see how they looked. A loss is a loss at this point. This effort with a loss would probably be better tolerated if they weren't such a wreck as a team.ย I guess it just depends on the definition of bad. They lost on a fluke goal bad dominated the vast majority of the game, even killing off a couple of five V3. Is that bad? I guess itโs bad because youโre not winning. The corollary to that would be Dallas was good because they won. They were not good this game.ย Quote
Sabres73 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 minute ago, KC Scouts said: Absolutely......we shouldn't use the "But we played really well" cliche If you are 14th place in the conference and were expected to make the playoffs. ย But the thing is, they did play very well. If you follow sports you're aware that sometimes you play well and still lose. It happens. Saying it's just a cliche is just lazy. ย 1 1 1 Quote
KC Scouts Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Just now, Sabres73 said: But the thing is, they did play very well. If you follow sports you're aware that sometimes you play well and still lose. It happens. Saying it's just a cliche is just lazy. ย No..Lazy is often how we shoot the puck. One goal on 48 shots. Oettinger played well but he wasn't Hasek out there. 2 1 Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 5 minutes ago, SDS said: I guess it just depends on the definition of bad. They lost on a fluke goal bad dominated the vast majority of the game, even killing off a couple of five V3. Is that bad? I guess itโs bad because youโre not winning. The corollary to that would be Dallas was good because they won. They were not good this game.ย Ray/Hamilton were talking about the shots, but also that not one Sabre was noted to be near or in the crease and that the fluke Dallas goal happened because someone was in UPLs grill. They were still unhappy about the perimeter play yet again. Their record when the other team scores first is abysma still, and this was another game where it happened.ย I don't think there is an answer here, I think this team is just flawed and incapable of putting together many complete games.ย 2 2 Quote
Slack_in_MA Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 We are what our record says we are. No sugar-coating it.ย Terry...Kevyn...Don... this is not progress. If it is, please enlighten us. 1 4 1 Quote
Buffalo Super Fan Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 27 minutes ago, KC Scouts said: Enough with the "great effort BS" WE LOST, WE LOST.....ONCE AGAIN.....WE LOST ย Exactly effort and working hard should be a given. The Buffalo Sabres are a mess and need major changes to their top 6 forwards. One goal isnโt core players you can win Stanley Cupโs with. The Sabres need block buster trades to there core. I would add veteran proven players not prospects that are more suspects than prospects in the Sabres organization. The Sabres are at rock bottom they need major changes to their core players. Firing the head coach and general manager isnโt going to accomplish anything. The Sabres players on this present roster arenโt good enough in my opinion. Go Sabres! Letโs Go Buffaloย 1 Quote
Thorner Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 My thoughts on todayโs game: With 48 points in 50 games, Sabres will need to play at a 120 point pace over remaining 32 games to get to 95 points and a likely playoff berthย Theyโll need to play at a 110 point pace or commit an inferior season to record than last seasonย 1 Quote
KC Scouts Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Just now, Thorny said: My thoughts on todayโs game: With 48 points in 50 games, Sabres will need to play at a 120 point pace over remaining 32 games to get to 95 points and a likely playoff berthย This team will go sub ย .500 for the final 32 games....13-14 wins at best.....I'm not happy about it but its likely going to happen 1 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 33 minutes ago, SABRESfan said: Letโs say they make it.. and obviously lose in the first round. ย Who would feel better about the season? I don't understand the bolded. In order to make it, they're going to need to get to about 96 points, which would mean going something in the order of 23-7-2 down the stretch. To do so, their PP would need to be better, the scoring would have to be through the roof, Power would look like he's playing God Mode, and their goalies would have to be hotter than Hasek for over 2 straight months. In order to make it, they'd be absolutely the most dangerous team "no one wants to play" heading into the playoffs. We'd all be ecstatic. 1 Quote
Believer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 15 minutes ago, KC Scouts said: No..Lazy is often how we shoot the puck. Couldnโt agree moreโฆ No โWILL to scoreโโฆ Big reason so few charge the netโฆย Just too many rushed shots with no expectation of scoringโฆ Seems itโs just enough to get a shot offโฆ Too many wide, high or in the chest of the goalieโฆ Adams has assembled a roster of mediocrity. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.