Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, GoPuckYourself said:

He couldn't put any weight on it, it's either the achilles or a broken bone after looking up options, usually. 

But on the broadcast they said he DID put weight on it once he got to the tunnel.

If a lateral ligament in the knee was injured, he may not have wanted the skate on the ice because any twisting of the knee would've been excruciating but straight ahead movement would've been fine.  It also could be the ankle.  (Your guesses are also valid at this time, too.)

Posted
14 minutes ago, Taro T said:

But on the broadcast they said he DID put weight on it once he got to the tunnel.

If a lateral ligament in the knee was injured, he may not have wanted the skate on the ice because any twisting of the knee would've been excruciating but straight ahead movement would've been fine.  It also could be the ankle.  (Your guesses are also valid at this time, too.)

I just watched the replay and before Quinn got up, he definitely looked at the heel of his left leg. I don’t know if it was his L or R Achilles that he was recovering from, but him doing that made me think he re-injured himself in the same spot. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Taro T said:

But on the broadcast they said he DID put weight on it once he got to the tunnel.

If a lateral ligament in the knee was injured, he may not have wanted the skate on the ice because any twisting of the knee would've been excruciating but straight ahead movement would've been fine.  It also could be the ankle.  (Your guesses are also valid at this time, too.)

Oh I didn't hear that broadcast, that's definitely more positive then..hopefully!

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Mr Peabody said:

Chance of playoffs are nil.  Put Olofsson in and boost his trade value as it’s obvious we aren’t keeping him. 

If that's the mindset then who cares about Olofsson, his value will always be small. Teams already have a large sample size to go by. Might as call up Kulich and let him learn defense on the fly.

 

2 hours ago, pi2000 said:

Hope it's not the same achilles.   I was concerned he came back too soon.

Elliott Friedman last night during the 2nd intermission of the Vancouver game on HNIC said it wasn't achilles, it was his ankle. He said the Sabres will know how serious it is on Monday.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Two or less said:

If that's the mindset then who cares about Olofsson, his value will always be small. Teams already have a large sample size to go by. Might as call up Kulich and let him learn defense on the fly.

 

Elliott Friedman last night during the 2nd intermission of the Vancouver game on HNIC said it wasn't achilles, it was his ankle. He said the Sabres will know how serious it is on Monday.


 

Absolutely looked like an ankle or maybe knee.  
 

Hope it’s just a sprain and he’ll be back sooner than later.  
 

I can’t take anymore doom and gloom with this team especially with Quinn.  Who’s probably my favorite player on this team rn.  

Posted
6 hours ago, shrader said:

Are we seriously back to the point of using the reaction button as a dick measuring contest?

As if that ever stopped.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

If he is out long term then KA needs to find a solution. Make a trade and get a scorer in here that he should have gotten during the summer! This team will not come close to making the playoffs as is. They need help and KA needs to get off his ass and do his damn job. Status quo is not progress. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WhenWillItEnd66 said:

If he is out long term then KA needs to find a solution. Make a trade and get a scorer in here that he should have gotten during the summer! This team will not come close to making the playoffs as is. They need help and KA needs to get off his ass and do his damn job. Status quo is not progress. 

We All know that's not gonna happen he's likely gonna call someone up and thats it 

Edited by Buffalonill
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GoPuckYourself said:

I would think Rosen. 

If they are choosing based on recent play, Rosen/Kulich might not be the choice.  Both have gone on a bit of a cold streak relative to how they started.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

If the Sabres don't have a prospect they can call up to take Quinn's spot then I don't want to hear another word about the Sabres prospects.

Either they are worth playing.. or they are not.  Time to sink or swim. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Two or less said:

Elliott Friedman last night during the 2nd intermission of the Vancouver game on HNIC said it wasn't achilles, it was his ankle. He said the Sabres will know how serious it is on Monday.

That would be best case scenario.   

In my amateurish armchair MD opinion I'm diagnosing him with a grade 3-4 subluxation.

Posted
14 hours ago, Two or less said:

If that's the mindset then who cares about Olofsson, his value will always be small. Teams already have a large sample size to go by. Might as call up Kulich and let him learn defense on the fly.

 

Elliott Friedman last night during the 2nd intermission of the Vancouver game on HNIC said it wasn't achilles, it was his ankle. He said the Sabres will know how serious it is on Monday.

There’s no sample size of VO playing for a better team.  We’ve had a number of players leave and improve their play under different systems.   I’m thinking the league looks at him and sees a cannon shot and weak points they can improve.  A third line with a couple of strong forwards who play D would be worth a shot. 

Posted
14 hours ago, shrader said:

Are we seriously back to the point of using the reaction button as a dick measuring contest?

Wouldn't it be better to just use a tape measure?

Posted
3 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Wouldn't it be better to just use a tape measure?

Yes of course, but then we'd end up with threads on measuring techniques, over vs. under, and length vs. girth, not to mention the analytics crowd taking over with graphs and charts on size vs. efficacy and performance levels in "high danger" areas. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

Yes of course, but then we'd end up with threads on measuring techniques, over vs. under, and length vs. girth, not to mention the analytics crowd taking over with graphs and charts on size vs. efficacy and performance levels in "high danger" areas. 

The analytic crowd has a tendency to complicate the simple. They will start to talk about curvatures and bend rate. They will also have different categories for extended and not extended. It can get messy when this crowd gets involved. 🤡

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...