Norcal Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 Ok so Jack Quinn has had another unfortunate injury that appears to be serious enough to keep him out for another portion of the season. This sucks for JQ because he has been really good since he came back this season. Feel free to post any updates here. Let's hope he's back sooner than later. The team is on break for All Star weekend and players won't be moved for a couple weeks so who replaces Quinn in the lineup if he cannot return by Feb 6th? Tired: Olofsson, I'm tired of him. He's tired of Buffalo. Wired: Kulich has wired alot of pucks with his buddy Rosen in their Rochester basement. Bring him up and play him enough to get acclimated. Quote
K-9 Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 I hate to say it, but given what I’ve seen of Kulich so far in the A, his D game makes VO look like a Selke contender. He’s just not close to being ready for the show, imo. 3 1 Quote
Norcal Posted January 28 Author Report Posted January 28 3 minutes ago, K-9 said: I hate to say it, but given what I’ve seen of Kulich so far in the A, his D game makes VO look like a Selke contender. He’s just not close to being ready for the show, imo. Ryan Johnson got off to an uneven start in Rochester and was frowned upon as a call up early on, until he was called up and never left. Kulich has work to do on D but it's time to see if he really has that NHL shot. Him and Rosen should get time on Quinns line w Peterka and Cozens Quote
TageMVP Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 43 minutes ago, K-9 said: I hate to say it, but given what I’ve seen of Kulich so far in the A, his D game makes VO look like a Selke contender. He’s just not close to being ready for the show, imo. He's only one guy. And he probably won't get as many minutes according to how Granato inserts new guys. His defensive "liabilities" shouldnt be that much of a hindrance. Side question, if not Kulich, then who do you call up? If this Kulich guy has big time offensive chops, call him up. Go for broke. Safe should be out the window. The Sabres need to win right now Or Make a TRADE 1 1 Quote
inkman Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 I’m never pumping another players tires again. Jinxed like a mofo. 3 1 Quote
Taro T Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 So THIS is why Adams was looking to get Kane in. It wasn't to cover for Quinn's 1st injury, it was for his next injury. 4D chess indeed. Quote
#freejame Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 12 minutes ago, Taro T said: So THIS is why Adams was looking to get Kane in. It wasn't to cover for Quinn's 1st injury, it was for his next injury. 4D chess indeed. Speaking of Kane—16 points in 19 games after his surgery and slow start is impressive. Can someone tell me why he obviously sucks like I heard for half the year? 1 2 Quote
K-9 Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 1 hour ago, TageMVP said: He's only one guy. And he probably won't get as many minutes according to how Granato inserts new guys. His defensive "liabilities" shouldnt be that much of a hindrance. Side question, if not Kulich, then who do you call up? If this Kulich guy has big time offensive chops, call him up. Go for broke. Safe should be out the window. The Sabres need to win right now Or Make a TRADE Is Donnie gonna give him those limited minutes with skilled offensive line mates or scrubs? And if he does give him higher skilled line mates, are those guys also seeing limited minutes as a result? Quote
Taro T Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 (edited) 5 minutes ago, K-9 said: Is Donnie gonna give him those limited minutes with skilled offensive line mates or scrubs? And if he does give him higher skilled line mates, are those guys also seeing limited minutes as a result? Not suggesting Kulich get called up, but if he is called up, he probably ends up on one of the 3 offensive lines taking a regular shift but then gets 2 shifts tops in the 3rd if the Sabres have a tight lead. So, it likely doesn't affect his linemates' ice time at all. Edited January 28 by Taro T Quote
Stoner Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 8 minutes ago, #freejame said: Speaking of Kane—16 points in 19 games after his surgery and slow start is impressive. Can someone tell me why he obviously sucks like I heard for half the year? You telling me SS is full of numbnuts? 4 1 Quote
TageMVP Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, K-9 said: Is Donnie gonna give him those limited minutes with skilled offensive line mates or scrubs? And if he does give him higher skilled line mates, are those guys also seeing limited minutes as a result? I don't know what Granato is going to do. I can guess based off prior call-ups. What I would do, if I was Granato, and I did indeed call up Kulich, I'd put him right where Jack Quinn was. Same line. That Savoie call up was pointless. Three minutes total, waste of time Quote
Mr Peabody Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 Chance of playoffs are nil. Put Olofsson in and boost his trade value as it’s obvious we aren’t keeping him. 1 1 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 2 hours ago, Mr Peabody said: Chance of playoffs are nil. Put Olofsson in and boost his trade value as it’s obvious we aren’t keeping him. Playing him has just as good as chance of reducing his trade value even further 1 2 Quote
pi2000 Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 Hope it's not the same achilles. I was concerned he came back too soon. Quote
Scottysabres Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 To bad about Quinn, he's a good one. Was hoping to see him finish the season strong then come back next year even better. These injuries I'm sure are frustrating to him. Heal up young man, your needed back in the trenches. Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 Do we even know how serious the injury is yet? 1 Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 11 minutes ago, JoeSchmoe said: Do we even know how serious the injury is yet? Taro- You're disagreeing with me when I'm asking a question? Seriously, what do we know? 1 Quote
Taro T Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 9 minutes ago, JoeSchmoe said: Taro- You're disagreeing with me when I'm asking a question? Seriously, what do we know? You asked a question. The answer to the question was 'No.' Wtf do you need the answer spelled out in a post, when the reaction allows it to be answered with 2 clicks? Well, to answer your question, NO we do not know how serious the injury is. Truly doubt the Sabres even know yet as you usually don't do MRIs / ultrasounds until a couple of days later after swelling has gone down. Happy? 1 3 1 Quote
JoeSchmoe Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 1 minute ago, Taro T said: You asked a question. The answer to the question was 'No.' Wtf do you need the answer spelled out in a post, when the reaction allows it to be answered with 2 clicks? Well, to answer your question, NO we do not know how serious the injury is. Truly doubt the Sabres even know yet as you usually don't do MRIs / ultrasounds until a couple of days later after swelling has gone down. Happy? The description on the X says "Disagree", not "No". What you're saying makes more sense... though a written No response could have been done in just 4 clicks. 1 Quote button 2 N 3 O 4 Submit Reply 3 2 Quote
Taro T Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 (edited) 1 minute ago, JoeSchmoe said: The description on the X says "Disagree", not "No". What you're saying makes more sense... though a written No response could have been done in just 4 clicks. 1 Quote button 2 N 3 O 4 Submit Reply NO. 5 clicks plus scrolling back to the "submit reply" button. (6 counting the period.) Edited January 29 by Taro T 1 1 Quote
GoPuckYourself Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 (edited) Its getting heated in here. The Lions losing pissed you all off too? I here ya. Edited January 29 by GoPuckYourself 2 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 “Disagreeing” with a question (how?) isn’t answering it. I really hope it’s not a serious injury. 1 2 Quote
Taro T Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 (edited) 5 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: “Disagreeing” with a question (how?) isn’t answering it. I really hope it’s not a serious injury. Always have viewed the green check mark as a "yes" and the red X as a "no." If they are viewed in that light, they are FAR more flexible and useful. Because 'yes' can also be a very brief 'agree with you here' and 'no' can also be a very brief 'nope, we are in disagreement.' Edited January 29 by Taro T 1 Quote
GoPuckYourself Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 3 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: “Disagreeing” with a question (how?) isn’t answering it. I really hope it’s not a serious injury. He couldn't put any weight on it, it's either the achilles or a broken bone after looking up options, usually. 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 4 minutes ago, Taro T said: Always have viewed the green check mark as a "yes" and the red X as a "no." Mmm Kay. 1 1 1 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.