Jump to content

What word would you use to describe the Buffalo Sabres this morning?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. What word would you use to describe the Buffalo Sabres this morning?

    • Resurgent
      1
    • Resplendent
      0
    • Rock-hard
      0
    • Surging
      0
    • Streaking
      3
    • Revitalized
      1
    • Refurbished
      3
    • Unstoppable
      0
    • Rocketing
      0
    • Red-hot
      1
    • Something else
      41


Recommended Posts

  • Stoner changed the title to What word would you use to describe the Buffalo Sabres this morning?
Posted

Only 2 games... so I would describe them as "Fools gold" right now. Looks good from far away but once you start looking at the team as a whole you just need to sit back and keep mining till you see the real thing.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

Last night:  Lucky

For the season: inconsistent, mediocre, incompetent, cooked, etc….

I’ve been trying so hard to reclaim mediocre for it’s true meaning: average. But doesn’t look like that’s gonna happen 

mediocre teams make the playoffs 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Thorny said:

I’ve been trying so hard to reclaim mediocre for it’s true meaning: average. But doesn’t look like that’s gonna happen 

mediocre teams make the playoffs 

I feel like mediocre has the the intonation that it’s slightly below average. If a team was being referred to as mediocre, I would expect them to be in the 17th-20th range. 

Posted
Just now, sabresparaavida said:

I feel like mediocre has the the intonation that it’s slightly below average. If a team was being referred to as mediocre, I would expect them to be in the 17th-20th range. 

It seems to have that connotation yes, perhaps I’m the only one who seemingly adheres to the strict definition which allows for/specifically mentions “average”. But probably colloquially pointless at this point I guess, to your point 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Thorny said:

It seems to have that connotation yes, perhaps I’m the only one who seemingly adheres to the strict definition which allows for/specifically mentions “average”. But probably colloquially pointless at this point I guess, to your point 

Yeah, I’d guess it mainly stems from people preferring to just use average when things are average, and that morphed mediocre to “baseline competence” or “slightly below average”. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, sabresparaavida said:

Yeah, I’d guess it mainly stems from people preferring to just use average when things are average, and that morphed mediocre to “baseline competence” or “slightly below average”. 

Ya I just read a definition I liked that stated it as “average, but in the case one wanted more”. So, average yet still at the same time disappointing.

that’s kinda the way I use it but ya, can’t be denied it’s used more often as “slightly below” 

Edited by Thorny
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...