Slack_in_MA Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 OK. Regardless of the final score, except for the PP, they should play that period on an endless loop in the Sabres locker room. THAT is what “good” looks like. 4 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 5 minutes ago, Sidc3000 said: How is it a good call? Ullmark was already moving back into the goal and them reached back in an attempt to stop the puck which caused him to fall backwards. No way does Okposo’s stick cause Ullmark to fall over. 5 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: You and I and the God in heaven know that if that was the Sabres and Levi, they would have counted it. Yes and I would be upset ! Lol Quote
shrader Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 1 minute ago, bob_sauve28 said: Easy period for Levi Comrie would have given up 6. 2 Quote
JohninMinn. Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 That's some good coaching there Donny. Keep it up. 1 Quote
Night Train Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 At least they banned " I Surrender Dear " as the pre-game song . I will actually make it to the 2nd period for the first time in a week. 3 Quote
Sidc3000 Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 Well with that explanation from Marty I guess it was a good call Quote
Pimlach Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 We can be happy with a 0-0 period. It’s something. 1 Quote
Crusader1969 Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 2 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: Was it though? Ullmark felll back into the net on his own. Meanwhile the puck was loose in the crease. I thought that Krebs stick pushed Ullmarks pads backwards. Let me know what the Sabres broadcast has to say. We have the Bruins on Sportsnet + Quote
pi2000 Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 Good period... should be the standard moving forward. That said, Boston looked disinterested. Quote
steveoath Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 We’re outshooting the 20-6. What parallel universe have I stumbled into?!? 1 1 1 Quote
Stads Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 19 SOG in a period against Boston. Is Dahlin the problem? I'll show myself out 3 Quote
Sidc3000 Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 1 minute ago, steveoath said: We’re outshooting the 20-6. What parallel universe have I stumbled into?!? 3 minutes ago, pi2000 said: Good period... should be the standard moving forward. That said, Boston looked disinterested. Yeah they won’t shortly Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 8, 2023 Author Report Posted December 8, 2023 7 minutes ago, Brawndo said: They escaped the first without surrendering a goal 4 Quote
Quint Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 Maybe that last period v Detroit woke this team up. Quote
lowsabre Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 I was getting food and missed the bus and got late! BUT I'M HERE AND IT'S 0-0. AS I SAID THIS MORNING, DIAMOND HANDS BABY, DIAMOND HANDS Quote
Scottysabres Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: I actually believe Boston played extremely light, given their normal play. I really wonder if NLHPA and owner ship conversations about the Sabres are monetary driven.....a "let them take a game" mindset. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 TD Garden concessions up on the 300 level. Keep in mind this is Delaware North. Sal's Pizza. Good local chain. But just like with LaNova at Key Bank Center, this isn't a real Sals pizza. 3 2 Quote
Thorner Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 25 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said: Good call. I'd be upset if it was the other way around Agree. Don’t see what the majority are seeing here. To me KO clearly contributes to Ullmark going off balance there which impedes his ability to make the save Anyways, great period Quote
Pimlach Posted December 8, 2023 Report Posted December 8, 2023 16 minutes ago, Sidc3000 said: Well with that explanation from Marty I guess it was a good call He is President of the goalies union. He should support the use of that rule. The just wasn’t enough contact to be interference, but that is the side the league wants. Protect the goalie. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.