Jump to content

IT'S GAME DAY: Buffalo Sabres (9-9-2) @ New Jersey Devils (8-9-1) Sat 7pm MSG, ESPN+


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, thewookie1 said:

There is a bit of what 13 said. 
 

We have to overpay the average overpay to get UFAs and most that are interested are on the other end of their career. 
 

The Chychrun thing also showed evidence of issues acquiring players due to excessive demands by other teams due to us having multiple prospects.

Wook, we're not talking top line players here. You know it, I know it, hell, just about everyone knows it. So what are we talking on the cap stamp? An extra 8 mil, offsetting the cap by sending some elsewhere? And really, 13 is using some unbelievably liberal asset spending, as if "All Of These Assets Will Be Sabres And they Will Carry US To Hockey Heaven. We've need the umbrella for the youth. I've conceded this to my thoughts on the team well over a year ago. Where ya at in your line of thought.

What I'm expressing is well within the realm of reason.

Posted
7 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

Rough night all around, I just can’t wrap my head around why not one team build, GM nor coach can get the Sabres to play hard for 60min for a majority of a season. We’ve changed our player strategy multiple times and yet no 

Needed to get experience on the roster to teach young guns how to ride through the season. This would have included 1 ideally 2 4th line energy guys who can also provide some level of protection & leadership on ice, (winning experience, leadership & knowledge on & off ice). EJ not enough. Oakie, Skinny, & Z - none have the winning part….

I have said this multiple times now. GMKA can’t keep all his boys- they are assets that must be used (w team on ice or trades) to make the team somehow competitive. This is where GM makes hay….

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, 7+6=13 said:

I mean I feel the same towards you.  4 players and a true #1 goalie actually makes me laugh out loud.  You can think it's KA not wanting that all you'd like.   We don't need top end talent necessarily,  we need those guys that are good and fill your roster out.  Those free agents aren't coming here unless you give them years and millions more.  You aren't trading our prospects until they prove worth.  That means they have to develop in Roc, etc.  That time isn't now to maximize their trade potential. 

What?

Ok, sure. Let's just keep this type of game outcomes going..... 🤣 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Marvin said:

I figured that veterans who play with the attitude of Okposo and Girgensons could be had.  A few years ago, maybe they needed to sign a goaltender for an extra year with extra pay.

They have needed either veteran skaters to help cover for the inexperienced goalkeepers or a veteran goalkeeper to cover for the inexperienced skaters.  Over 3 offseasons, that seems reasonable to me.

We've tried that with more players than either one of us care to remember.  It didn't work.  Over the last 3 seasons? No, unless we'd like to count Clifton and Johnson.  Mmm, not good.  

To get players better than them, we have to massively over pay and KA isn't doing it.  I agree with him.  

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...