Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

Enter Jacob Bryson!  😂😂😂
 

PS Too bad for Mule.  Hopefully the injury bug at some point moves on. 

I certainly do not want to enter him, good sir! Unless that might make him a better defenseman. I will consider it and let you know

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
42 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

Enter Jacob Bryson!  😂😂😂
 

PS Too bad for Mule.  Hopefully the injury bug at some point moves on. 

Awesome. This saves me the trouble of posting a hypothetical to you.

10 minutes ago you wanted to bench Owen Power. Now you’re laughing at the seventh defenseman. 

Take your time. We’ll wait.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, SDS said:

Awesome. This saves me the trouble of posting a hypothetical to you.

10 minutes ago you wanted to bench Owen Power. Now you’re laughing at the seventh defenseman. 

Take your time. We’ll wait.

You are okay with Bryson in the lineup?

Posted
19 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

You are okay with Bryson in the lineup?

🤦‍♂️

Who did you think was going to replace Owen Power when you benched him?

  • Haha (+1) 7
Posted
6 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

I guess that partially explains why Power and Dahlin were the 2 D on the ice at game’s end.  

Meatballs also like to stick both of them on the ice in high pressure situations. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Night Train said:

Stillman ? 

He was scratched for at least one Amerks game.  Not sure if it means anything as they have 8 legit AHL DMen. 

 

Edited by inkman
Posted
30 minutes ago, inkman said:

He was scratched for at least one Amerks game.  Not sure if it means anything as they have 8 legit AHL DMen. 

 

Are they up against the veteran limit at all?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

Maybe not, but if they know it's just a game or two I could see giving him that to bust his NHL cherry.

R Johnson could get called up simply because they don't want to expose a vet to waivers this early in the season.  That would make more sense.  

You know injuries are coming, and you suspect we could unload a goalie at some point creating a roster spot - so maybe you wait on Stillman/Clague to avoid waivers.  

Right now we have little Bryson to replace our best defensive defenseman - oh boy.  

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

R Johnson could get called up simply because they don't want to expose a vet to waivers this early in the season.  That would make more sense.  

You know injuries are coming, and you suspect we could unload a goalie at some point creating a roster spot - so maybe you wait on Stillman/Clague to avoid waivers.  

Right now we have little Bryson to replace our best defensive defenseman - oh boy.  

You're right, there's also the waiver issue, but if they cleared waivers at the season's start, they don't have to clear waivers again for 30 days, innit?  They can just be sent back down?  (Or are beginning-of-the-season waivers different?)

Edited by Doohickie
Posted
Just now, Doohickie said:

There's also the waiver issue, but if they cleared waivers at the season's start, they don't have to clear waivers again for 30 days, innit?  They can just be sent back down?  (Or are beginning-of-the-season waivers different?)

Good question.   I was not aware of a 30 day thingy.  

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...