Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

We could use a vet forward for bottom 6 that can play a heavy game and helps the PK, Kane is not that. 

Edited by Pimlach
Posted

Many people here want to move on from VO because of his one dimensional game. Kane brings more in terms of experience, playmaking and stick handling. His skill set is not a big hole on this team. He doesn’t bring elements that are needed like PK, grit, faceoffs and defensive awareness.

I’ve said it before, I would rather bring in Toews as a 4C than Kane as a middle 6W for the requirements I listed above.

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Pimlach said:

We could could a vet forward for bottom 6 that can play a heavy game and helps the PK, Kane is not that. 

Actually, that puts it in a nutshell:  If the Sabres need vet help, it's not for a skilled goal scorer.  It's for grit.

Posted

One thing just hit me: even if we discount every legitimate and semi-legitimate prospect in Rochester, I could make a persuasive argument that ever player brings something to the Sabres that we could use more of, whereas Kane does not.  In Buffalo, Kane is truly redundant.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...