Jump to content

NHL looking to increase "geographic rivalry" games by next year with scheduling format changes


Recommended Posts

  • matter2003 changed the title to NHL looking to increase "geographic rivalry" games by next year with scheduling format changes
Posted
23 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

Potentially up to 8x a year...assuming Toronto would be one for us?

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/report-nhl-looking-to-add-more-rivalry-games-with-changes-to-schedule-225728930.html

 

We may be seeing the Battle of Alberta a lot more often as soon as next season as the NHL reportedly explores changes to its scheduling format.

If you have 2 games / team x 24 teams = 48 games outside the division and 4 games / team x 7 teams = 28 games in the division, then you only have 6 games left.  Maybe you play 3 teams twice more?  I do not see how this works.

Posted

Seems to be in part a way to have the salary cap go up quicker due to increased ticket sales that occur when rivals that are close geographically play each other due to opponent fan bases traveling to road games.

 

Salary cap only projected to go up $1 million next year due to pandemic related escrows still not be fully paid back. This is seen as a way to get those paid back quicker so they can get back to larger cap increases.

  • Agree 1
Posted

If true, this is awful. Baseball sucks as it is having to watch the same two teams play 19 times a season. Don’t spread the same disease to others sports. Mind numbingly boring. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SDS said:

If true, this is awful. Baseball sucks as it is having to watch the same two teams play 19 times a season. Don’t spread the same disease to others sports. Mind numbingly boring. 

We all know how most decisions are based on money in sports, not what is good for fans or based on what fans actually want.

Posted

As I think about it, I would rather they make the conference balanced at 4 games per team with conference-wide playoffs and seeding.  Probably the Western Conference would not like that with travel.

Posted
43 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

Seems to be in part a way to have the salary cap go up quicker due to increased ticket sales that occur when rivals that are close geographically play each other due to opponent fan bases traveling to road games.

 

Salary cap only projected to go up $1 million next year due to pandemic related escrows still not be fully paid back. This is seen as a way to get those paid back quicker so they can get back to larger cap increases.

They are also saving money with reduced travel.

Posted
1 hour ago, matter2003 said:

Potentially up to 8x a year...assuming Toronto would be one for us?

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/report-nhl-looking-to-add-more-rivalry-games-with-changes-to-schedule-225728930.html

 

We may be seeing the Battle of Alberta a lot more often as soon as next season as the NHL reportedly explores changes to its scheduling format.

Nah, TO would take the Otters & Moe-ray-all.

Sabres would get the Pens & BJs.  😥

Posted
44 minutes ago, SDS said:

If true, this is awful. Baseball sucks as it is having to watch the same two teams play 19 times a season. Don’t spread the same disease to others sports. Mind numbingly boring. 

Was gonna mention: the MLB is even moving towards less interdivisional games this coming season, which I think is a good move 

Posted (edited)

I don't like this.  I enjoy seeing the Sabres play all of the teams throughout the league.  I never liked too many games between the same two teams.  Save that for the playoffs.  I think we play our division rivals more than enough already.  I really liked it many years ago when they had the balanced schedule.  Back in those days, it was great to see the Gretzky Oilers 4 times per year, twice in Buffalo. Under the current system, we only see the McDavid Oilers twice a year, once in Buffalo.

The balanced scheudle is also inherently more fair.  If every team plays every other team the same number of times, every team can more fairly be compared to every other team.  Currently teams in tougher divisions inherently have tougher schedules and a more difficult road to making the playoffs.

I'm sure many will disagree and I do see the benefits of less travel and more intense rivalries with the unbalanced schedule.  I just like the balanced system better.

Edited by msw2112
  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...