Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Toilet_Mop said:

I don't understand this you wouldn't take a team that has more overall points than last year? 

Not at the expense of taking away the top scorers and seeing a more boring team in its place.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
19 hours ago, mjd1001 said:

Not at the expense of taking away the top scorers and seeing a more boring team in its place.

Still doesn't make sense I don't care how they play if they win more games. Play the trap for all I care 

  • Vomit 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Toilet_Mop said:

Still doesn't make sense I don't care how they play if they win more games. Play the trap for all I care 

Overall, yes, and I agree: but the idea here for why having a few really good scorers rather than hypothetically just a couple more points would be the preferred scenario is that we aren’t a finished product yet. We can add to the parts that are working. 

Finished product? Ya, give me the team with more points in the standings, full stop 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
4 hours ago, Toilet_Mop said:

Still doesn't make sense I don't care how they play if they win more games. Play the trap for all I care 

I guess we are going to disagree.  Give me 2 teams that both miss the playoffs. One is slightly better but plays the trap and scores 2 goals per game...I'm not watching.  A team with a few less points over a full season but plays up and down the ice and scores 4-5 every night...at least I'm entertained.

If you aren't making the playoffs, entertain me. If you dont' do that, I have zero reason to watch.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, mjd1001 said:

I guess we are going to disagree.  Give me 2 teams that both miss the playoffs. One is slightly better but plays the trap and scores 2 goals per game...I'm not watching.  A team with a few less points over a full season but plays up and down the ice and scores 4-5 every night...at least I'm entertained.

If you aren't making the playoffs, entertain me. If you dont' do that, I have zero reason to watch.

Still doesn't matter both teams do not make the playoffs in your scenario 

Posted
5 hours ago, Toilet_Mop said:

Still doesn't make sense I don't care how they play if they win more games. Play the trap for all I care 

 

I'd rather have the team oozing with talent that makes a Jersey like jump from one year to the next.

Posted
Just now, matter2003 said:

 

I'd rather have the team oozing with talent that makes a Jersey like jump from one year to the next.

I'd rather have the team that wins as many games as they can regardless of team strategy 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Toilet_Mop said:

I'd rather have the team that wins as many games as they can regardless of team strategy 

Not if that team isn't making the playoffs and at the expense of overall talent level for future years.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, matter2003 said:

Not if that team isn't making the playoffs and at the expense of overall talent level for future years.

 

The teams we have now don't make the playoffs...

Posted
1 minute ago, Toilet_Mop said:

The teams we have now don't make the playoffs...

Exactly...so if we get 86 points this year and miss the playoffs versus 92 points and miss the playoffs but then our potential goes from 110 points to 98 points the following year from it, I am not interested.

IMO, this team is still a year away.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...