Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

 

It was one of 2.  Am almost getting brought around to the idea of letting Krebs play down there.  Just afraid that if he does go down there, he'll never figure out what passes can work at this level & what can't.

Posted

I haven’t seen Sheahan or Bjork in an Amerks jersey, but both should be very good contributers at that level. If not, send them to Cincinnati or lend them elsewhere.  I want the vets in Rochester to be positive examples for the youngsters. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

I haven’t seen Sheahan or Bjork in an Amerks jersey, but both should be very good contributers at that level. If not, send them to Cincinnati or lend them elsewhere.  I want the vets in Rochester to be positive examples for the youngsters. 

Established NHLers like them don’t get sent to the ECHL. And they couldn’t, anyway, without their permission. 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Amerks8796 said:

Established NHLers like them don’t get sent to the ECHL. And they couldn’t, anyway, without their permission. 

Well tell me about their play…good, bad or indifferent?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Amerks8796 said:

Both good. Could be better, but good. 

Haven't watched much Amerks action after ~Bjork's 2nd game there.  They SHOULD be good players there.  Good to see they are.

How many years did Matt Moulson extend his career after he was dog doo in the NHL?  That huge difference in average talent levels between the 2 leagues is there whether guys are going up or down.

Posted
21 hours ago, LabattBlue said:

I haven’t seen Sheahan or Bjork in an Amerks jersey, but both should be very good contributers at that level. If not, send them to Cincinnati or lend them elsewhere.  I want the vets in Rochester to be positive examples for the youngsters. 

Bjork has been dominant.  Sheahan hasn’t been very noticeable.  

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
21 hours ago, DarthEbriate said:

Boom!

My preseason prediction of "Will any Sabres center win greater than 50% faceoffs?" is off to an excellent start. Sheahan. 10 faceoffs. 7 wins. The leader is in the clubhouse.

So this year's Cody Eakin, without the flow?  Eh, better off in Rachacha.

Posted
1 hour ago, Doohickie said:

So this year's Cody Eakin, without the flow?  Eh, better off in Rachacha.

Still a vastly better player then Eakin (you could literally say this about any other forward in the NHL). 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...