Curt Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 5:44 AM, PerreaultForever said: I could be wrong about this, but if he retired, the Sabres do not have to pay him his contract and he can work wherever he wants. The money against the cap for the Sabres is only on paper. They aren't actually paying him at all. Expand Sabres are actually paying him. However, most of his salary is reimbursed by an insurance policy. At least that’s what I recall. 1 Quote
FogBat Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 1:59 AM, Doohickie said: Do you have friends? Expand Well played, my friend. Well played. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 7:52 AM, Curt said: Sabres are actually paying him. However, most of his salary is reimbursed by an insurance policy. At least that’s what I recall. Expand So what you're saying is a player still gets paid his salary AFTER he retires? That doesn't sound right or make sense, but it's the NHL CBA so I guess anything's possible. Quote
MattPie Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 (edited) On 9/27/2022 at 5:37 PM, PerreaultForever said: So what you're saying is a player still gets paid his salary AFTER he retires? That doesn't sound right or make sense, but it's the NHL CBA so I guess anything's possible. Expand He's not retired, he's on LTIR. If he did retire, it's possible it would have cap implications (for Dallas) depending on how the contract was structured. I don't know the details, but in broad strokes if a team played games with front-loading the contract (see: Buffalo's contract with Ehrhoff) to get around the cap, but the player retires during the course of the contract, there are cap penalties for the team that benefited from the cap circumvention. Edited September 27, 2022 by MattPie Quote
Curt Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 5:37 PM, PerreaultForever said: So what you're saying is a player still gets paid his salary AFTER he retires? That doesn't sound right or make sense, but it's the NHL CBA so I guess anything's possible. Expand He is not retired though. He is unable to play due to injury. Injured players still get paid and their contracts still count against the cap. Retired players do not. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 6:56 PM, Curt said: He is not retired though. He is unable to play due to injury. Injured players still get paid and their contracts still count against the cap. Retired players do not. Expand Ya got it. I read that he'd retired so I had assumed he had retired rather than stay on LTIR so that he could take that job. The Jim Nill "further review" thing cleared it up. Quote
Flashsabre Posted September 27, 2022 Report Posted September 27, 2022 If they want to give the Sabres Robertson we will gladly send Bishop back😀 Quote
apuszczalowski Posted September 29, 2022 Report Posted September 29, 2022 On 9/27/2022 at 10:33 PM, Flashsabre said: If they want to give the Sabres Robertson we will gladly send Bishop back😀 Expand I proposed that already in my last reply....... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.