SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 On 2/21/2022 at 1:17 PM, pastajoe said: And then to avoid further PR damage from them leaving, the Sabres resigned Vanek to a big contract instead of taking 5 1st round picks from Edmonton, which in retrospect would have been the better long term deal. Edmontn went to a final soon after that. Would it really have been better long term? Quote
ddaryl Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 On 2/24/2022 at 7:12 PM, calti said: 13 seconds --let it GO Foot in the crease The throwback Wide Right Quote
tom webster Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 51 minutes ago, SwampD said: Edmontn went to a final soon after that. Would it really have been better long term? Exactly what Finals was that? Quote
SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 10 minutes ago, tom webster said: Exactly what Finals was that? They lost to the Hurricanes. Quote
tom webster Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 21 minutes ago, SwampD said: They lost to the Hurricanes. That was before the Vanek offer sheet. Am I missing something? Quote
SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 6 minutes ago, tom webster said: That was before the Vanek offer sheet. Am I missing something? Doesnt matter. The picks would have been late. Quote
tom webster Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 3 hours ago, SwampD said: Doesnt matter. The picks would have been late. At least 2 of them were first overall. Quote
SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 5 minutes ago, tom webster said: At least 2 of them were first overall. Who’d we miss out on? Nail? i know hindsight is 20/20 an we know how bad the Sabres have been since then, i’m just not sure this was one of the franchise altering decisions that people keep making it out to be. Quote
pastajoe Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 6 hours ago, SwampD said: Edmontn went to a final soon after that. Would it really have been better long term? Having two 1st round picks for multiple years would have definitely been better long term. Quote
SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 10 minutes ago, pastajoe said: Having two 1st round picks for multiple years would have definitely been better long term. Meh. I have enough real stuff to be mad at the Sabres for doing. Ill leav the hypothetical stuf to others. Quote
SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 Sweet. A reason to keep watching. Quote
Weave Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 5 minutes ago, SwampD said: Sweet. A reason to keep watching. Medication? 1 Quote
SwampD Posted February 27, 2022 Report Posted February 27, 2022 57 minutes ago, Weave said: Medication? I was wrong. Quote
spndnchz Posted February 28, 2022 Report Posted February 28, 2022 22 hours ago, Weave said: Medication? If you’re watching without medication you’re doing it wrong. Quote
SwampD Posted February 28, 2022 Report Posted February 28, 2022 (edited) 53 minutes ago, spndnchz said: If you’re watching without medication you’re doing it wrong. Unfortunately, i have to wait until i meet with a team of people to know when i can have my next beer. Sux Edited February 28, 2022 by SwampD Quote
Eleven Posted February 28, 2022 Report Posted February 28, 2022 On 2/27/2022 at 1:45 PM, tom webster said: At least 2 of them were first overall. But maybe they wouldn't have been if Edmonton had Vanek. On 2/27/2022 at 1:53 PM, SwampD said: i’m just not sure this was one of the franchise altering decisions that people keep making it out to be. Agreed. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.