Brawndo Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 (edited) Edited November 4, 2021 by Brawndo Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Guess that fixes the cap floor. 3 Quote
SwampD Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Gotta get to the floor? Dammit LGR! Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 9 minutes ago, SwampD said: Gotta get to the floor? Dammit LGR! 2 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 (edited) That really shores up the right side of the defense, veteran leadership, grit... oh... oh right. Still, cap compliance is important. (Edit: Execute Order Seventy!) What does everyone think the eventual future consideration becomes? Edited November 4, 2021 by DarthEbriate Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 9 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: That really shores up the right side of the defense, veteran leadership, grit... oh... oh right. Still, cap compliance is important. What does everyone think the eventual future consideration becomes? Nothing or a 7th round pick in 2025 1 Quote
WildCard Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 How long is he on the books for? Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, WildCard said: How long is he on the books for? One year 1 1 Quote
SwampD Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 (edited) I still cannot understand how anyone can say that we are not tanking. I mean, why spend money on actual players when you can pay someone who has already retired. Edited November 4, 2021 by SwampD 1 Quote
sabrefanday1 Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 would have much preferred to get a veteran center with that money Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, sabrefanday1 said: would have much preferred to get a veteran center with that money sarcasm? 9 minutes ago, SwampD said: I still cannot understand how anyone can say that we are not tanking. I mean, why spend money on actual players when you can pay someone wha already retired. I keep explaining what tanking is and how it doesn't fit the definition of what the Sabres are doing but you keep ignoring that. 3 Quote
sabrefanday1 Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Just now, LGR4GM said: sarcasm? no...we could really use a vet center right now unless we are tanking Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 9 minutes ago, sabrefanday1 said: no...we could really use a vet center right now unless we are tanking I guess then I am confused why you said "with that money". What money are you talking about and how does it preclude us from getting a center? Quote
DarthEbriate Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Nothing or a 7th round pick in 2025 I'm leaning nothing as well. But I hope Lou is all... "You know, I like Sheevyn. I'm gonna give them that low 6th that JBott traded their high 6th for. I believe in karmic balance." A 6th in 2023 is my pipe dream. Quote
SwampD Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Just now, LGR4GM said: sarcasm? I keep explaining what tanking is and how it doesn't fit the definition of what the Sabres are doing but you keep ignoring that. Just because you believe it doesn't mean it's true. And it's exactly what they did the last tank. The only difference is that they never use the word "Tank." Hmm, maybe that's all it takes for it not to be a tank? 1 Quote
sabrefanday1 Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Now we have a retired d-man we are paying til the end of year and he makes good money...they clearly do not want to spend much right now so instead iof spending on Boychuk to get to the cap floor at least spend it on a center Quote
DarthEbriate Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 3 minutes ago, SwampD said: I still cannot understand how anyone can say that we are not tanking. I mean, why spend money on actual players when you can pay someone wha already retired. Future considerations. Lou Lamiorello now owes Donny "the Don" Meatballs a favor. And Meatballs always collects. 1 3 1 Quote
sabrefanday1 Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Just now, DarthEbriate said: Future considerations. Lou Lamiorello now owes Donny "the Don" Meatballs a favor. And Meatballs always collects. yes lets hope that is how it works out Quote
DarthEbriate Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 Just now, sabrefanday1 said: Now we have a retired d-man we are paying til the end of year and he makes good money...they clearly do not want to spend much right now so instead iof spending on Boychuk to get to the cap floor at least spend it on a center Now flip Boychuk to Arizona. They'll give up a 2nd to show us the true meaning of the Concept of Tank. 🍺😇 1 Quote
sabrefanday1 Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 1 minute ago, DarthEbriate said: Now flip Boychuk to Arizona. They'll give up a 2nd to show us the true meaning of the Concept of Tank. 🍺😇 if we ever needed any proof that Arizona is without doubt tanking so they can draft that stud 1st then add Mathews in a few years we got the proof when they signed Carter Hutton! Quote
SwampD Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 3 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: Now flip Boychuk to Arizona. They'll give up a 2nd to show us the true meaning of the Concept of Tank. 🍺😇 Love it. Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 13 minutes ago, sabrefanday1 said: Now we have a retired d-man we are paying til the end of year and he makes good money...they clearly do not want to spend much right now so instead iof spending on Boychuk to get to the cap floor at least spend it on a center I am so confused the Sabres can spend money on center at any time they want. They have tons of room for it and boychuk and his 1.25mil in actual money is not relevant to that. 15 minutes ago, SwampD said: Just because you believe it doesn't mean it's true. And it's exactly what they did the last tank. The only difference is that they never use the word "Tank." Hmm, maybe that's all it takes for it not to be a tank? So if this tank works then I get to say that tanks work. Sweet. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 4, 2021 Report Posted November 4, 2021 22 minutes ago, SwampD said: Just because you believe it doesn't mean it's true. And it's exactly what they did the last tank. The only difference is that they never use the word "Tank." Hmm, maybe that's all it takes for it not to be a tank? Laugh all you want but you want to play semantics I am game. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.