JohnC Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Thorny said: VO. He could be right or not, just thought bringing that discussion over here made sense as a conversation point.. I am awaiting your comment! I don't believe that is going to happen. VO has been playing hurt. He hasn't been the same player since his injury. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 4 hours ago, SwampD said: The Future!!!! I have a copy of this as well. TM didn’t exactly follow the plan. 42 minutes ago, Thorny said: @GASabresIUFANseems to think our leading point producer by rate this season might be on the chopping block.. Not sure why this conversation belongs in the Eichel trade thread. Quote
Thorner Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 8 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I have a copy of this as well. TM didn’t exactly follow the plan. Not sure why this conversation belongs in the Eichel trade thread. Well the topic of whether or not we'll be trading away our good players was brought up, thought it made an interesting discussion point. Your arguments for why they may move on from VO made sense to me even if I completely disagreed with them/the course of action that would lead to KA making those decisions, should he make them Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 (edited) Ultimately, the question of keeping VO comes down to how does KA and the management team view the forward core group. I believe they want our top 3 centers to emerge from Mitts, Krebs, Cozens and now Thompson. Of the 4, I think Krebs ends up on the wing. Quinn, Krebs, Asplund, JJP, Tuch and Skinner are KA’s top six wingers long-term. (Skinner because we have no choice). Where does that leave VO? Now add to that the need for real goaltending and veteran D, I can see KA moving on from VO to help fill other holes. Edited January 12, 2022 by GASabresIUFAN 1 Quote
Thorner Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Ultimately, the question of keeping VO comes down to how does KA and the management team view the forward core group. I believe they want our top 3 centers to emerge from Mitts, Krebs, Cozens and now Thompson. Of the 4, I think Krebs ends up on the wing. Quinn, Krebs, Asplund, JJP, Tuch and Skinner are KA’s top six wingers long-term. (Skinner because we have no choice). Where does that leave VO? On a third scoring line if Asplund is on a checking line? In the top 6 for now, being currently better than all of Quinn, Peterka, Krebs, and probably Skinner? Helping the team become good so the development of all the young players, including the players we want as replacements for him, stays on track? That they have a capable player to beat out rather than being gifted a spot? Playing in the top 6 anyways after an inevitable injury? The good teams don't amass 9 players who they think are good enough to fill the lineup and then call it a day. Never mind picking 9 players they think will *one day* be good enough, while calling it a day. - - - I feel like people are skipping a step, here, along the way. We see the prospects, and our team at the bottom of the standings, and plan out how they'll transform us into, the greatest sabres team I have ever seen in 2006. They need to create a decent team first. We are not *close* to VO being appropriately jettisoned unless he's coming to KA with completely ridiculous, unjustified terms as an RFA. We haven't heard any indication that VO's mentality flies in the face of KA's "want to be here" slogan. I continue to believe they CAN keep VO if they want to. 4 Quote
dudacek Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 3 hours ago, Thorny said: Have to agree on Dahlin, his play to my eye looks to be practically begging to be complemented with players closer to his talent level. I think it was when Adams first came on but Jack did say it's because he wasn't on board with their chosen direction of a rebuild. When Adams went a different way last season Eichel was content to try it Like all those breakaway passes wasted on the likes of Cody Eakin? 2 1 Quote
dudacek Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 4 hours ago, GoPuckYourself said: Night after night I see Dahlin ....stand around while the puck is in net. You know who else does that? Victor Hedman. He's been on the ice 43 ES goals against this year. That's 4 more than Dahlin has, despite the fact Hedman plays with much better teammates, in front of much better goaltending, and gets less even-strength ice time. I think people wouldn't be nearly as hard on Dahlin if the Sabres actually won a few. 7 Quote
K-9 Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, dudacek said: You know who else does that? Victor Hedman. He's been on the ice 43 ES goals against this year. That's 4 more than Dahlin has, despite the fact Hedman plays with much better teammates, in front of much better goaltending, and gets less even-strength ice time. I think people wouldn't be nearly as hard on Dahlin if the Sabres actually won a few. Great point. The word “sagacious” comes to mind. Quote
Thorner Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, dudacek said: You know who else does that? Victor Hedman. He's been on the ice 43 ES goals against this year. That's 4 more than Dahlin has, despite the fact Hedman plays with much better teammates, in front of much better goaltending, and gets less even-strength ice time. I think people wouldn't be nearly as hard on Dahlin if the Sabres actually won a few. I laughed out loud when Hedman fell at the blueline yesterday, sending Jankowski in on an unhampered breakaway from our blue line. It looked *exactly* like youth hockey. Not junior - youth. Come on people - that was objectively as ridiculous as any play we've seen Dahlin make, and Hedman is..the best veteran D-man in the world? It's not on the highlight reels cause Jankowski was the benefactor. 1 Quote
Thorner Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 Hedman is young. Just give him a little time to develop dammit! 3 Quote
Thorner Posted January 12, 2022 Report Posted January 12, 2022 The only funnier play between the two of them I can recall is when Dahlin fell while trying to slap the puck away from our net after a goal 🤣 Quote
sabresparaavida Posted January 13, 2022 Report Posted January 13, 2022 18 hours ago, Thorny said: The only funnier play between the two of them I can recall is when Dahlin fell while trying to slap the puck away from our net after a goal 🤣 What about the ghost check on risto Quote
nfreeman Posted January 13, 2022 Report Posted January 13, 2022 20 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Ultimately, the question of keeping VO comes down to how does KA and the management team view the forward core group. I believe they want our top 3 centers to emerge from Mitts, Krebs, Cozens and now Thompson. Of the 4, I think Krebs ends up on the wing. Quinn, Krebs, Asplund, JJP, Tuch and Skinner are KA’s top six wingers long-term. (Skinner because we have no choice). Where does that leave VO? Now add to that the need for real goaltending and veteran D, I can see KA moving on from VO to help fill other holes. Asplund’s position is far from secure IMHO. He’s been pretty stinky lately. Quote
LGR4GM Posted January 13, 2022 Report Posted January 13, 2022 13 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Asplund’s position is far from secure IMHO. He’s been pretty stinky lately. Quote
Thorner Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 7 hours ago, sabresparaavida said: What about the ghost check on risto You'd have to refresh my memory! Quote
sabresparaavida Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 20 minutes ago, Thorny said: You'd have to refresh my memory! https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=638320333668591&_rdr 3 Quote
SDS Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 Lest anyone think John is out of the woods, this was posted today on an ADR Facebook group I belong to. Quote
LGR4GM Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, SDS said: Lest anyone think John is out of the woods, this was posted today on an ADR Facebook group I belong to. My understanding was always the concern wasn't the surgery as much as the possibility for disc slippage after and once they decided to move on from Jack, why take the risk of the surgery or this. I worry about him once he starts taking hits. 2 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: My understanding was always the concern wasn't the surgery as much as the possibility for disc slippage after and once they decided to move on from Jack, why take the risk of the surgery or this. I worry about him once he starts taking hits. The hockey media sold this procedure like it was LASIK. 6 Quote
LGR4GM Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: The hockey media sold this procedure like it was LASIK. Yea, because they wanted to maintain access to Eichel's agents as a source of info. Quid pro quo. Quote
K-9 Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 21 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: The hockey media sold this procedure like it was LASIK. Agreed. The hockey media never presented the alternative viewpoint from the medical community and the concerns they have about sustaining high speed, high impact collisions. It had simply never been done on a player in a game like hockey and those concerns are still valid. 1 Quote
Weave Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 1 hour ago, SDS said: Lest anyone think John is out of the woods, this was posted today on an ADR Facebook group I belong to. So, what am I looking at? Quote
Trettioåtta Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 4 minutes ago, Weave said: So, what am I looking at? Based on spinal curvature. I think we're looking at Quasimodo's neck disc replacement 2 1 Quote
French Collection Posted January 14, 2022 Report Posted January 14, 2022 On a different note, I did not know Tuch was a PK guy. I thought he was good there last night. Bonus. 2 Quote
Brawndo Posted January 14, 2022 Author Report Posted January 14, 2022 2 hours ago, SDS said: Lest anyone think John is out of the woods, this was posted today on an ADR Facebook group I belong to. I’m not a radiologist, but that looks like the Lumbar Spine at levels L4 and L5 and the sacrum to me. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.