kas23 Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 7 minutes ago, Zamboni said: Shocked shocked I tell you … and it won’t make a dent in his future actions. Not a one. Scum bag. Really, the punishment for these types of offenses should double for each repeated offense: 1, 2, 4, 8, etc. People wouldn’t even have to wonder what the next suspension will be. That would quickly put a damper of actions like these. 2
Weave Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 11 minutes ago, Zamboni said: Shocked shocked I tell you … and it won’t make a dent in his future actions. Not a one. Scum bag. I bet his coaches give him an earful for taking himself out of the lineup for 6 games in the heat of the run to the playoffs. That will make a dent in future actions. 1
DarthEbriate Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, kas23 said: Really, the punishment for these types of offenses should double for each repeated offense: 1, 2, 4, 8, etc. People wouldn’t even have to wonder what the next suspension will be. That would quickly put a damper of actions like these. For his 8th suspension, by this count Marchand should be looking at: 1,2,4,8,16,32,64, 128. So he's up to 1.5 seasons.
Eleven Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 6 hours ago, Taro T said: Makes sense. It's HIS fault Price & Weber have been injured and that Kokateniemi & Danault are gone. 😕 Oh, we are straying into Eleven getting angry about firing the coach and not the GM territory here. 38 minutes ago, kas23 said: Really, the punishment for these types of offenses should double for each repeated offense: 1, 2, 4, 8, etc. People wouldn’t even have to wonder what the next suspension will be. That would quickly put a damper of actions like these. I love this idea.
Zamboni Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 23 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: For his 8th suspension, by this count Marchand should be looking at: 1,2,4,8,16,32,64, 128. So he's up to 1.5 seasons.
LGR4GM Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 (edited) Sam Reinhart currently is at a point per game (44 in 44) and has already outproduced last season in 10 fewer games. If he gets 6 more points he will have outdone the 2019 season which he played 69 games in. His season high for points is 65 in 82 games from 2018/19. Jerry Sullivan's tweet from November continues to age like fine grade A milk left inside a hot car for 20 years, then dumped on some nuclear waste, rebottled into an old garbage can where it mixed with the sewage water at the bottom. And just for @pi2000he currently has a +18 Edited February 10, 2022 by LGR4GM spelling 3
nfreeman Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 There were a number of posters here, including me, who wanted Tippett to coach the Sabres, or at least be seriously considered. I'm not saying this news proves that was a dumb idea, but it does kinda argue in favor of Tippett not being the cure to the Sabres' ailments. 1
Sabres Fan in NS Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 The Habs are desperate, but they fired an excellent coach.
woods-racer Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 33 minutes ago, The Ghost of Doohickie said: The Habs are desperate, but they fired an excellent coach. He needed sacrificed as they crowds have been sharping the pitch forks and soaking the torches in kerosene for sometime. 2
Sabres Fan in NS Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, woods-racer said: He needed sacrificed as they crowds have been sharping the pitch forks and soaking the torches in kerosene for sometime. Very goodly typing, my friend. I can even understand a few of the words, but not all of them and certainly not when you have put them all together like that. 1 1
IKnowPhysics Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 VGK appears to be pulling a Kucherov by putting Mark Stone on LTIR until playoffs to free up cap space to activate Eichel and Martinez: https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/ice-breakers-could-stone-injury-open-space-for-vegas-to-activate-eichel/: They'd still need to clear another ~1.45M more.
Sabel79 Posted February 10, 2022 Report Posted February 10, 2022 Okay, Gary. That’s enough now. Pull the plug. 2
LGR4GM Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 47 minutes ago, Sabel79 said: Okay, Gary. That’s enough now. Pull the plug.
DarthEbriate Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 I wonder how the NHLPA feels about a team that's been downsizing its cap and collecting revenue sharing while they're paying off escrow for years... is now moving to a new venue that needs substantial upgrades to be considered NHL-capable but will have a fraction of the revenue-generating capacity of a regular stadium, instead of moving to a robust new market (Houston) with a full-size building. I wonder how the fellow owners feel about the fact that the Coyotes have been collecting their revenue-sharing money and not providing cash for years and years. Note: There's no plan here for building a new stadium... just an option to extend this agreement.
Brawndo Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 41 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said: I wonder how the NHLPA feels about a team that's been downsizing its cap and collecting revenue sharing while they're paying off escrow for years... is now moving to a new venue that needs substantial upgrades to be considered NHL-capable but will have a fraction of the revenue-generating capacity of a regular stadium, instead of moving to a robust new market (Houston) with a full-size building. I wonder how the fellow owners feel about the fact that the Coyotes have been collecting their revenue-sharing money and not providing cash for years and years. Note: There's no plan here for building a new stadium... just an option to extend this agreement. There are rumblings that they will be removed from the revenue sharing plan for awhile 1
Curt Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 2 hours ago, DarthEbriate said: I wonder how the NHLPA feels about a team that's been downsizing its cap and collecting revenue sharing while they're paying off escrow for years... is now moving to a new venue that needs substantial upgrades to be considered NHL-capable but will have a fraction of the revenue-generating capacity of a regular stadium, instead of moving to a robust new market (Houston) with a full-size building. I wonder how the fellow owners feel about the fact that the Coyotes have been collecting their revenue-sharing money and not providing cash for years and years. Note: There's no plan here for building a new stadium... just an option to extend this agreement. Narrator: “They were not pleased. They were not pleased at all.”
nfreeman Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 I read somewhere (I think in the Athletic) that ASU is requiring the Coyotes to pay in full up front, no doubt due to their disputes with their prior landlord.
PerreaultForever Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 14 hours ago, nfreeman said: There were a number of posters here, including me, who wanted Tippett to coach the Sabres, or at least be seriously considered. I'm not saying this news proves that was a dumb idea, but it does kinda argue in favor of Tippett not being the cure to the Sabres' ailments. It's not his fault. Edmonton has goaltending almost as bad as ours, a bad D and very little really good depth. Relying on 2 star players and a handful of other okay players to carry a team to the promised land is foolish no matter how good those stars might be, So no, Tippett couldn't have fixed the Eichel-Reinhart-Risto Sabres but he'd coach this group of kids we have just fine. Everybody here should be happy the bruins seem to be falling apart.
LGR4GM Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 Leaf fans not happy about this hit. Calgary fans say it's clean. Thoughts?
Weave Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 Head first contact, so that may be troublesome for Zads, but I’m not sure how he avoids head contact and still play the body.
Sabres Fan in NS Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 54 minutes ago, Weave said: Head first contact, so that may be troublesome for Zads, but I’m not sure how he avoids head contact and still play the body. Leaf had his head down a little just before contact, which made the head hit first. Zads could not avoid that and I think that some of that may be taken into consideration. Zads intent was to hit shoulder to shoulder. That seems obvious.
French Collection Posted February 11, 2022 Report Posted February 11, 2022 He wasn’t targeting the head in my opinion, just stopping him in his tracks. Kase with his head down but he did see him.
Recommended Posts