Doohicksie Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 2 hours ago, LGR4GM said: idk, at this rate they will be flirting with that 60% cap floor. Would acquiring a $10M player in a trade fix that? Asking for a friend. Quote
Taro T Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 1 minute ago, Doohickie said: Would acquiring a $10M player in a trade fix that? Asking for a friend. No. They need to be at their minimum expansion draft salary at the end of the expansion draft. (They also need to remain below the expansion draft max salary, but that appears not to be remotely an issue. Unless a whole lot of "insiders" have their heads up their bippies.) Quote
Radar Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 19 minutes ago, Taro T said: Not really presuming the other rumored choices are also correct. Barring several trades (which could obviously still happen) or injuries there is little likelihood that Borgen is one of their top 8 D on opening night. Which effectively gives him back to Buffalo in October if Adams wants him back. This could be the case. If it's not it's not like we lost Victor Hedman although another week or two some would have elevated him to that level. 2 Quote
Thorner Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 Gotta keep Risto or trade him for a player better than Borgen. But can't keep him because he doesn't "want" to be here. So you have to trade him for an asset better than Borgen. 1 Quote
LabattBlue Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Radar said: This could be the case. If it's not it's not like we lost Victor Hedman although another week or two some would have elevated him to that level. Would you have rather lost Miller + a 4th(for Seattle taking him), or Borgen? Edited July 21, 2021 by LabattBlue Quote
Thwomp! Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 20 minutes ago, Radar said: This could be the case. If it's not it's not like we lost Victor Hedman although another week or two some would have elevated him to that level. Nice strawman. Quote
DarthEbriate Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 12 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Would you have rather lost Miller + a 4th(for Seattle taking him), or Borgen? For me, I'd have had Miller + our MTL 5th (we don't own ours, so it's late 5th round) on the table instead of Borgen, and I could have caved for the 4th. We've got 10 picks in this year's draft. It costs more to replace him in UFA than if we'd have spent a mid-round pick, especially if it's a JAG that we overvalue (Matt Irwin, for example), or worse, a multi-year deal on an overpay for someone who is fine, but whom Borgen quickly outgrows. Quote
DarthEbriate Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 53 minutes ago, Taro T said: Not really presuming the other rumored choices are also correct. Barring several trades (which could obviously still happen) or injuries there is little likelihood that Borgen is one of their top 8 D on opening night. Which effectively gives him back to Buffalo in October if Adams wants him back. Holistically, yes. But I was speaking specifically from Buffalo's available list. Miller, he's peaked and his pricetag isn't great for being a #7. Girgs was hurt and is JAG, plus overpaid. Okposo would be a good choice, but the injuries, no way. Skinner: ha! Give me the upside. The total sleeper would have been Ogelvie, because Seattle also needs to fill out half an AHL roster this season, but he also cannot seem to stay healthy. Quote
Shootica Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 The only thing losing Borgen should dictate is how many cheap depth defensemen we sign in free agency. Not who we draft. Not if we trade Risto/Miller. All of that should be a completely separate discussion. 2 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 1 hour ago, nfreeman said: Power is LHD, where the Sabres are deep. Not directed at you specifically but why do people keep saying this? We are NOT deep at ANY position. What? Is Bryson an allstar in people's minds now? It just seems ridiculous to me that people don't want Power because they think we have too many good left hand D men. 2 Quote
Thorner Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 1 minute ago, PerreaultForever said: Not directed at you specifically but why do people keep saying this? We are NOT deep at ANY position. What? Is Bryson an allstar in people's minds now? It just seems ridiculous to me that people don't want Power because they think we have too many good left hand D men. There's no viable argument imo that we don't need Power There's a viable argument that we need him less than an elite centre prospect 5 Quote
Hoss Posted July 21, 2021 Author Report Posted July 21, 2021 8 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Not directed at you specifically but why do people keep saying this? We are NOT deep at ANY position. What? Is Bryson an allstar in people's minds now? It just seems ridiculous to me that people don't want Power because they think we have too many good left hand D men. 100%. This team needs everything and high-end defensemen is very near the top of the list of things we need. 2 Quote
nfreeman Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 25 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Not directed at you specifically but why do people keep saying this? We are NOT deep at ANY position. What? Is Bryson an allstar in people's minds now? It just seems ridiculous to me that people don't want Power because they think we have too many good left hand D men. This is fair. My point was more that the decision as to whether to draft Power shouldn't be informed by the loss of Borgen, since they play different sides. 1 Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 FROM TSN.CA https://www.tsn.ca/seattle-kraken-expansion-draft-blog-1.1670707 Here's a summary of the reported picks so far: Forwards - Mason Appleton (WPG), Joonas Donskoi (COL), Jordan Eberle (NYI), Morgan Geekie (CAR), Jared McCann (TOR), Alexander True (SJS) Defence - Gavin Bayreuther (CBJ), William Borgen (BUF), Mark Giordano (CAL), Cale Fleury (MTL), Haydn Fleury (CAR), Adam Larsson (EDM), Carson Soucy (MIN) Goaltenders - Chris Driedger (FLA), Joey Daccord (OTT), Vitek Vanecek (WAS) Quote
DarthEbriate Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 ^ I'm very curious what Carolina gave up to not pick Bean. Quote
bunomatic Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 So with all the side deals seattle apparently has coming they should have a pile of draft capital. Eichel would be a nice centerpiece and the face of the new team no ? 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 (edited) 8 hours ago, LabattBlue said: Would you have rather lost Miller + a 4th(for Seattle taking him), or Borgen? Miller plus 4th. I’m not sweating losing Borgen either. Seattle picked a bunch of defenseman but they needed more at RHD. Edited July 22, 2021 by Pimlach 2 Quote
sabre2590 Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 Has anyone speculated that eichel could go to Seattle, for #2 plus more? It just makes so much sense to me. Seattle gets a star franchise center with immediate impact who’s locked up for years, they’ll have a ton of cap space based on their expansion roster leaks, and the #2 overall most likely won’t contribute this year in what’s said to be a poor draft. the part that is iffy is what would they have to offer besides #2 overall. Maybe they get a bunch of draft capital in side deals? Or maybe botterill says no way Jose are we bringing in that guy. Who knows but I found it interesting there’s been no reported interest Quote
Radar Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 2 hours ago, LabattBlue said: Would you have rather lost Miller + a 4th(for Seattle taking him), or Borgen? Satisfied as is. We were going to lose a player and we did. Borgen looked good but very small sample size. 2 hours ago, Thwomp! said: Nice strawman. Whatever. Thanks for your insight. 2 Quote
dudacek Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 What if the cost to protect Borgen was higher than a 4th? Is Borgen a better asset than Ristolainen, or marginally better than Colin Miller? You can’t have it both ways. 1 Quote
darksabre Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 Colin Miller is also severely underrated by this fanbase. He's a much better defenseman than anyone gives him credit for. If this team is good this season he's going to play a big part in that. 3 1 1 Quote
Hoss Posted July 21, 2021 Author Report Posted July 21, 2021 1 minute ago, darksabre said: Colin Miller is also severely underrated by this fanbase. He's a much better defenseman than anyone gives him credit for. If this team is good this season he's going to play a big part in that. The reason this fanbase (and many others) underrate defensemen so badly is because they’re hard to evaluate so when the team is bad it’s easy to assume it’s on the defense. 4 Quote
dudacek Posted July 21, 2021 Report Posted July 21, 2021 1 minute ago, darksabre said: Colin Miller is also severely underrated by this fanbase. He's a much better defenseman than anyone gives him credit for. If this team is good this season he's going to play a big part in that. If Risto’s gone, Miller will inherit his offensive minutes. It will be the first time he’s been properly used in his Sabres career. Botterill was such a moron when it came to roster building. 3 1 Quote
Hoss Posted July 21, 2021 Author Report Posted July 21, 2021 Just now, dudacek said: If Risto’s gone, Miller will inherit his offensive minutes. It will be the first time he’s been properly used in his Sabres career. Botterill was such a moron when it came to roster building. Ironically this is the perfect thread to discuss Botterill’s roster building. 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.